Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Eyng, Ana Maria
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Pacievtch, Thais, D’Almeida, Maria de Lourdes do Prado K., Gisi, Maria de Lourdes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
spa
Título da fonte: Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Texto Completo: https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/900
Resumo: This study aims to analyze the contradictions between anthropological and teleological aspects of evaluation and human rights in educational policies for basic education in Brazil. The study focuses on the contradictions by analyzing policy documents related to the two themes. The results suggest the ways that contradictions in the anthropological and teleological perspectives assumed by these policies obstruct provision of basic education that includes social quality. Basic educational evaluation policies are aimed at regulation, seeking to produce indices that normalize and homogenize the subjects of education, legitimizing identities. On the other hand, human rights educational policies aim to emancipate subjects by considering the diversity that characterizes and organizes them, enabling the creation of resistance and project identities that can operate from a counter-hegemonic perspective.
id CESGRANRIO_ca208754dcac50833337389e5ac4eedf
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.localhost:article/900
network_acronym_str CESGRANRIO
network_name_str Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in BrazilPoliticas de evaluacion y educacion en derechos humanos: las contradicciones entre regulacion y emancipacion en la educacion basicaPoliticas de avaliação e de educação em direitos humanos: as contradicoes entre regulação e emancipação na educação basicaEducação; Politicas EducacionaisPublic policies; Evaluation; Human rightsPoliticas públicas; Evaluacion; Derechos humanosThis study aims to analyze the contradictions between anthropological and teleological aspects of evaluation and human rights in educational policies for basic education in Brazil. The study focuses on the contradictions by analyzing policy documents related to the two themes. The results suggest the ways that contradictions in the anthropological and teleological perspectives assumed by these policies obstruct provision of basic education that includes social quality. Basic educational evaluation policies are aimed at regulation, seeking to produce indices that normalize and homogenize the subjects of education, legitimizing identities. On the other hand, human rights educational policies aim to emancipate subjects by considering the diversity that characterizes and organizes them, enabling the creation of resistance and project identities that can operate from a counter-hegemonic perspective.La investigación tiene como objetivo analizar las contradicciones entre los aspectos antropologicos y teologicos de la evaluacion y los derechos humanos en las politicas educativas para la educacion basica en Brasil. El estudio toma como categoria central la contradiccion en el analisis de documentos legales relacionados con los temas en discusion. Los resultados de la investigación muestran como las contradicciones en las perspectivas antropologica y teologica, asumidas por estas politicas obstruyen la ejecucion de una educacion basica de calidad social. Las politicas de evaluacion en Brasil estan dirigidas a la regulacion, con miras a los indices que normalizan y homogeneizan los sujetos de la educacion, produciendo identidades legitimadoras. Por otra parte, las politicas educativas en los derechos humanos tienen como objetivo la emancipacion de los sujetos, considerando la diversidad que los caracteriza y configura, lo que permite la creacion de identidades de resistencia y de proyectos identidades que pueden operar desde una perspectiva contra hegemonica. A investigação tem por objetivo analisar as contradicoes entre aspectos antropologicos e teleologicos nas politicas de avaliação e de educação em direitos humanos para a educação basica. O estudo assume como categoria central a contradicao na analise de documentos legais relativos às tematicas em discussao. Os resultados da pesquisa apontam o quanto as contradicoes nas perspectivas antropologicas e teleologicas, dessas politicas incidem como obstaculos na efetivação da educação basica de qualidade social. As politicas de avaliação da educação basica tem como finalidade a regulação, com vistas à produção de indices que normatizam e hegemonizam os sujeitos, produzindo identidades legitimadoras. Por outro lado, as politicas de educação em direitos humanos tem por finalidade a emancipação dos sujeitos, considerados na diversidade que os caracteriza e configura, possibilitando a constituicao de identidades de resistencia e de projetos capazes de atuar numa perspectiva contra-hegemônica. Fundação CesgranrioEyng, Ana MariaPacievtch, ThaisD’Almeida, Maria de Lourdes do Prado K.Gisi, Maria de Lourdes2016-08-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/90010.1590/S0104-40362016000300007Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 24, n. 92 (2016): Revista Ensaio Jul./Set.; 670-6961809-44650104-4036reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Fundação Cesgranrioinstacron:CESGRANRIO-2porengspahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/900/554https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/900/555https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/900/556Americas; EuropaDireitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educaçãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-09-27T14:04:29Zoai:ojs.localhost:article/900Revistahttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaioONGhttps://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/oaiensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br1809-44650104-4036opendoar:2016-09-27T14:04:29Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranriofalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil
Politicas de evaluacion y educacion en derechos humanos: las contradicciones entre regulacion y emancipacion en la educacion basica
Politicas de avaliação e de educação em direitos humanos: as contradicoes entre regulação e emancipação na educação basica
title Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil
spellingShingle Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil
Eyng, Ana Maria
Educação; Politicas Educacionais
Public policies; Evaluation; Human rights
Politicas públicas; Evaluacion; Derechos humanos
title_short Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil
title_full Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil
title_fullStr Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil
title_sort Evaluation and human rights educational policies: contradictions between regulation and emancipation in basic education in Brazil
author Eyng, Ana Maria
author_facet Eyng, Ana Maria
Pacievtch, Thais
D’Almeida, Maria de Lourdes do Prado K.
Gisi, Maria de Lourdes
author_role author
author2 Pacievtch, Thais
D’Almeida, Maria de Lourdes do Prado K.
Gisi, Maria de Lourdes
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Eyng, Ana Maria
Pacievtch, Thais
D’Almeida, Maria de Lourdes do Prado K.
Gisi, Maria de Lourdes
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv


dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Educação; Politicas Educacionais
Public policies; Evaluation; Human rights
Politicas públicas; Evaluacion; Derechos humanos
topic Educação; Politicas Educacionais
Public policies; Evaluation; Human rights
Politicas públicas; Evaluacion; Derechos humanos
description This study aims to analyze the contradictions between anthropological and teleological aspects of evaluation and human rights in educational policies for basic education in Brazil. The study focuses on the contradictions by analyzing policy documents related to the two themes. The results suggest the ways that contradictions in the anthropological and teleological perspectives assumed by these policies obstruct provision of basic education that includes social quality. Basic educational evaluation policies are aimed at regulation, seeking to produce indices that normalize and homogenize the subjects of education, legitimizing identities. On the other hand, human rights educational policies aim to emancipate subjects by considering the diversity that characterizes and organizes them, enabling the creation of resistance and project identities that can operate from a counter-hegemonic perspective.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-02
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/900
10.1590/S0104-40362016000300007
url https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/900
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0104-40362016000300007
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
spa
language por
eng
spa
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/900/554
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/900/555
https://revistas.cesgranrio.org.br/index.php/ensaio/article/view/900/556
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Revista Ensaio: Avaliação e Politicas Públicas em Educação
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Americas; Europa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Fundação Cesgranrio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ensaio: Avaliação e Políticas Públicas em Educação; v. 24, n. 92 (2016): Revista Ensaio Jul./Set.; 670-696
1809-4465
0104-4036
reponame:Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron:CESGRANRIO-2
instname_str Fundação Cesgranrio
instacron_str CESGRANRIO-2
institution CESGRANRIO-2
reponame_str Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Ensaio (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Fundação Cesgranrio
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ensaio@cesgranrio.org.br||fatimacunha@cesgranrio.org.br||alan@cesgranrio.org.br
_version_ 1754832030809456640

Registros relacionados