Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vector

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Katunzi, Gerald
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Munga, Stephen, Nkwengulila, Gamba, Kweka, Eliningaya, Matias, Jonathan R, Godfrey, Gilbert M
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Journal of Health & Biological Sciences
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/article/view/140
Resumo: Reduction of human-vector contact is of epidemiological importance in malaria control. Repellents can be used to complement the existing intervention tools against malaria vectors. Thus, evaluation of efficacy of additional mosquito repellents and /or attractants is of great significance for personal protection tools against malaria vectors. This study evaluated the repellence efficacy of menthol-propylene-glycol-carbonate (MR08) and Lemon grass (LG) against Anopheles gambiae. Experiments were performed in a room which was 7.8 meters by 3.9 meters in dimension. Three experimental set ups were performed, i) comparison of 10 hours worn sock and unworn sock;  ii) comparison of  10 hours worn sock treated with MR08 against worn sock alone, and iii) comparison of  10 hours worn sock treated with LG against worn sock alone. CDC miniature light traps were used to evaluate the recovery of released mosquitoes using both repellents and attractants. After initial trials, a concentration of 500 ppm was selected for all repellents. Among 1800 mosquitoes released into the experimental room, 1230 were recovered by CDC light traps while the remaining 570 were found within the experimental room. Among those collected by light traps, 1185 were collected by traps with worn sock alone. A worn sock treated with either MR08 or Lemon grass significantly repelled An.gambiae compared to worn sock alone. The findings of this study demonstrate that MR08 and lemon grass have inhibition efficiency against mosquito stings but further field evaluations are required for observed findings against wild populations of An.gambiae at lower Moshi using slow release method.
id CHRISTUS-1_500251315f19afc7a31d977b3ee39e0d
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/140
network_acronym_str CHRISTUS-1
network_name_str Journal of Health & Biological Sciences
repository_id_str
spelling Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vectorHealth Sciences; Biological Sciences; Biology; Life SciencesAnopheles gambiae s.s.; Repellents; Odours; CDC-light trap; Worn sock; Unworn sock; Lemon grass; MR08EntomologyReduction of human-vector contact is of epidemiological importance in malaria control. Repellents can be used to complement the existing intervention tools against malaria vectors. Thus, evaluation of efficacy of additional mosquito repellents and /or attractants is of great significance for personal protection tools against malaria vectors. This study evaluated the repellence efficacy of menthol-propylene-glycol-carbonate (MR08) and Lemon grass (LG) against Anopheles gambiae. Experiments were performed in a room which was 7.8 meters by 3.9 meters in dimension. Three experimental set ups were performed, i) comparison of 10 hours worn sock and unworn sock;  ii) comparison of  10 hours worn sock treated with MR08 against worn sock alone, and iii) comparison of  10 hours worn sock treated with LG against worn sock alone. CDC miniature light traps were used to evaluate the recovery of released mosquitoes using both repellents and attractants. After initial trials, a concentration of 500 ppm was selected for all repellents. Among 1800 mosquitoes released into the experimental room, 1230 were recovered by CDC light traps while the remaining 570 were found within the experimental room. Among those collected by light traps, 1185 were collected by traps with worn sock alone. A worn sock treated with either MR08 or Lemon grass significantly repelled An.gambiae compared to worn sock alone. The findings of this study demonstrate that MR08 and lemon grass have inhibition efficiency against mosquito stings but further field evaluations are required for observed findings against wild populations of An.gambiae at lower Moshi using slow release method.Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da EducacaoTropical pesticides research institute, Division of livestock and human disease vector divisionKatunzi, GeraldMunga, StephenNkwengulila, GambaKweka, EliningayaMatias, Jonathan RGodfrey, Gilbert M2015-03-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por ParesPeer ReviewRevisado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/article/view/14010.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v3i1.140.p4-9.2015Journal of Health & Biological Sciences; v. 3, n. 1 (2015): Journal of Health and Biological Sciences; 4-9Journal of Health & Biological Sciences; v. 3, n. 1 (2015): Journal of Health and Biological Sciences; 4-9Journal of Health and Biological Sciences; v. 3, n. 1 (2015): Journal of Health and Biological Sciences; 4-92317-30762317-308410.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v3i1.2015reponame:Journal of Health & Biological Sciencesinstname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:CHRISTUSenghttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/article/view/140/95https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/article/downloadSuppFile/140/67AfricaDireitos autorais 2016 Journal of Health & Biological Scienceshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-06-30T21:21:43Zoai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/140Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/indexPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/oaisecretaria.jhbs@unichristus.edu.br || editor.jhbs@fchristus.edu.br2317-30762317-3084opendoar:2023-01-13T09:47:23.933239Journal of Health & Biological Sciences - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vector
title Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vector
spellingShingle Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vector
Katunzi, Gerald
Health Sciences; Biological Sciences; Biology; Life Sciences
Anopheles gambiae s.s.; Repellents; Odours; CDC-light trap; Worn sock; Unworn sock; Lemon grass; MR08
Entomology
title_short Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vector
title_full Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vector
title_fullStr Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vector
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vector
title_sort Evaluation of repellents efficacy against Anopheles gambiae s.s.; an anthropophilic malaria vector
author Katunzi, Gerald
author_facet Katunzi, Gerald
Munga, Stephen
Nkwengulila, Gamba
Kweka, Eliningaya
Matias, Jonathan R
Godfrey, Gilbert M
author_role author
author2 Munga, Stephen
Nkwengulila, Gamba
Kweka, Eliningaya
Matias, Jonathan R
Godfrey, Gilbert M
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Tropical pesticides research institute, Division of livestock and human disease vector division
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Katunzi, Gerald
Munga, Stephen
Nkwengulila, Gamba
Kweka, Eliningaya
Matias, Jonathan R
Godfrey, Gilbert M
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Health Sciences; Biological Sciences; Biology; Life Sciences
Anopheles gambiae s.s.; Repellents; Odours; CDC-light trap; Worn sock; Unworn sock; Lemon grass; MR08
Entomology
topic Health Sciences; Biological Sciences; Biology; Life Sciences
Anopheles gambiae s.s.; Repellents; Odours; CDC-light trap; Worn sock; Unworn sock; Lemon grass; MR08
Entomology
description Reduction of human-vector contact is of epidemiological importance in malaria control. Repellents can be used to complement the existing intervention tools against malaria vectors. Thus, evaluation of efficacy of additional mosquito repellents and /or attractants is of great significance for personal protection tools against malaria vectors. This study evaluated the repellence efficacy of menthol-propylene-glycol-carbonate (MR08) and Lemon grass (LG) against Anopheles gambiae. Experiments were performed in a room which was 7.8 meters by 3.9 meters in dimension. Three experimental set ups were performed, i) comparison of 10 hours worn sock and unworn sock;  ii) comparison of  10 hours worn sock treated with MR08 against worn sock alone, and iii) comparison of  10 hours worn sock treated with LG against worn sock alone. CDC miniature light traps were used to evaluate the recovery of released mosquitoes using both repellents and attractants. After initial trials, a concentration of 500 ppm was selected for all repellents. Among 1800 mosquitoes released into the experimental room, 1230 were recovered by CDC light traps while the remaining 570 were found within the experimental room. Among those collected by light traps, 1185 were collected by traps with worn sock alone. A worn sock treated with either MR08 or Lemon grass significantly repelled An.gambiae compared to worn sock alone. The findings of this study demonstrate that MR08 and lemon grass have inhibition efficiency against mosquito stings but further field evaluations are required for observed findings against wild populations of An.gambiae at lower Moshi using slow release method.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-03-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
Peer Review
Revisado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/article/view/140
10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v3i1.140.p4-9.2015
url https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/article/view/140
identifier_str_mv 10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v3i1.140.p4-9.2015
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/article/view/140/95
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/jhbs/article/downloadSuppFile/140/67
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Journal of Health & Biological Sciences
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Journal of Health & Biological Sciences
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv Africa


dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Health & Biological Sciences; v. 3, n. 1 (2015): Journal of Health and Biological Sciences; 4-9
Journal of Health & Biological Sciences; v. 3, n. 1 (2015): Journal of Health and Biological Sciences; 4-9
Journal of Health and Biological Sciences; v. 3, n. 1 (2015): Journal of Health and Biological Sciences; 4-9
2317-3076
2317-3084
10.12662/2317-3076jhbs.v3i1.2015
reponame:Journal of Health & Biological Sciences
instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron:CHRISTUS
instname_str Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron_str CHRISTUS
institution CHRISTUS
reponame_str Journal of Health & Biological Sciences
collection Journal of Health & Biological Sciences
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Health & Biological Sciences - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv secretaria.jhbs@unichristus.edu.br || editor.jhbs@fchristus.edu.br
_version_ 1797052856440717312