PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fagundes, Gabriel Lima Miranda Gonçalves
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Duarte, Luciana Gaspar Melquíades
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
DOI: 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i34.p1-29.2022
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4021
Resumo: Objective: This paper is dedicated to the survey and analysis of the regulations of public consultations in Brazil and other Latin countries, formulating proposals to enable the democratic effectiveness of the institute in the administrative processes of creation of normative acts, encouraged by Law no. 13,655 (BRASIL, 2018), which amended the LINDB.Methodology: The empirical research employs documentary analysis of the legislation of Latin American countries with a socioeconomic reality close to that of Brazil to collect elements that enable the formulation of proposals for the effective application of the institute in Brazil. For this, eleven Latin countries were selected, whose legislations were consulted electronically by accessing the federal government sites, verifying the norms pointed out by the entities as regulating the public consultations. The theoretical framework was based on Jürgen Habermas's theory of proceduralist deliberative democracy, Hannah Arendt's concept of politics, and the constitutionalization of Administrative Law.Results: It was verified that there is an unsatisfactory regulation of the institute of public consultations in Brazil and in most of the researched countries, besides deducing that, thus, the institute has been used in a way to integrate only the legitimation rhetoric of the Public Administration, without properly fulfilling its democratic purpose.Contributions: The article contributes to the improvement of the regulation of public consultations in Brazil so that it actually meets its democratic assumptions and legitimizes normative administrative acts. Thus, based on the theoretical framework and the data collected, elements are proposed that should be observed when regulating and applying the institute.
id CHRISTUS-2_700345e772d830bd829834618fa5198c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/4021
network_acronym_str CHRISTUS-2
network_name_str Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
spelling PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTSLAS CONSULTAS PÚBLICAS COMO MECANISMO DE LEGITIMACIÓN DE LOS ACTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS NORMATIVOSAS CONSULTAS PÚBLICAS ENQUANTO MECANISMO DE LEGITIMAÇÃO DOS ATOS ADMINISTRATIVOS NORMATIVOSpublic consultation; procedure; participatory democracy; legitimation; normative administrative actconsulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimación; acto administrativo normativoDireito; Direito Administrativoconsulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimação; ato administrativo normativoObjective: This paper is dedicated to the survey and analysis of the regulations of public consultations in Brazil and other Latin countries, formulating proposals to enable the democratic effectiveness of the institute in the administrative processes of creation of normative acts, encouraged by Law no. 13,655 (BRASIL, 2018), which amended the LINDB.Methodology: The empirical research employs documentary analysis of the legislation of Latin American countries with a socioeconomic reality close to that of Brazil to collect elements that enable the formulation of proposals for the effective application of the institute in Brazil. For this, eleven Latin countries were selected, whose legislations were consulted electronically by accessing the federal government sites, verifying the norms pointed out by the entities as regulating the public consultations. The theoretical framework was based on Jürgen Habermas's theory of proceduralist deliberative democracy, Hannah Arendt's concept of politics, and the constitutionalization of Administrative Law.Results: It was verified that there is an unsatisfactory regulation of the institute of public consultations in Brazil and in most of the researched countries, besides deducing that, thus, the institute has been used in a way to integrate only the legitimation rhetoric of the Public Administration, without properly fulfilling its democratic purpose.Contributions: The article contributes to the improvement of the regulation of public consultations in Brazil so that it actually meets its democratic assumptions and legitimizes normative administrative acts. Thus, based on the theoretical framework and the data collected, elements are proposed that should be observed when regulating and applying the institute.Objetivo: El trabajo se dedica al relevamiento y análisis de las regulaciones de las consultas públicas en Brasil y otros países latinos, formulando propuestas para posibilitar la eficacia democrática del instituto en los procesos administrativos de creación de actos normativos, incentivados por la Ley Nº 13.655 (BRASIL, 2018), que modificó el LINDB. Metodología: La investigación empírica emplea el análisis documental de la legislación de países latinoamericanos con una realidad socioeconómica cercana a la de Brasil para recoger elementos que permitan la formulación de propuestas para la aplicación efectiva del instituto en Brasil. Para ello, se seleccionaron once países latinos, cuyas legislaciones fueron consultadas por vía electrónica con el acceso a los sitios del gobierno federal, verificando las normas señaladas por las entidades como reguladoras de las consultas públicas. Como marco teórico, se busca amparo en la teoría de la democracia deliberativa procedimentalista de Jürgen Habermas, en la Concepción de la política de Hannah Arendt y en la constitucionalización del Derecho Administrativo.Resultados: Se verificó que existe una regulación insatisfactoria del instituto de las consultas públicas en Brasil y en la mayoría de los países investigados, además de deducir que, así, el instituto ha sido utilizado de manera de integrar solamente la retórica de legitimación de la Administración Pública, sin cumplir adecuadamente su finalidad democrática.Contribuciones: El artículo contribuye al perfeccionamiento de la regulación de las consultas públicas en Brasil para que realmente cumpla con sus supuestos democráticos y legitime los actos administrativos normativos. Así, a partir del marco teórico y de los datos recogidos, se proponen elementos que deben observarse a la hora de regular y aplicar el instituto.Objetivo: O trabalho se dedica ao levantamento e à análise das regulamentações de consultas públicas do Brasil e de outros países latinos, formulando propostas para viabilizar a eficácia democrática do instituto nos processos administrativos de criação de atos normativos, incentivado pela Lei nº 13.655 (BRASIL, 2018), que alterou a LINDB.Metodologia: A pesquisa empírica emprega a análise documental das legislações de países da América Latina com realidade socioeconômica próxima à brasileira para coletar elementos que viabilizem a formulação de propostas para a aplicação eficaz do instituto no Brasil. Para tanto, foram selecionados onze países latinos, cujas legislações foram consultadas pela via eletrônica com o acesso aos sites governamentais federais, verificando as normas apontadas pelos entes como regulatórias das consultas públicas. Como marco teórico, buscou-se amparo na teoria da democracia deliberativa procedimentalista de Jürgen Habermas, na concepção de política de Hannah Arendt e na constitucionalização do Direito Administrativo.Resultados: Verificou-se que há uma regulamentação insatisfatória do instituto das consultas públicas no Brasil e na maioria dos países pesquisados, além de se deduzir que, assim, o instituto tem sido usado de forma a integrar apenas a retórica de legitimação da Administração Pública, sem cumprir propriamente sua finalidade democrática.Contribuições: O artigo contribui para o aprimoramento da regulamentação das consultas públicas prévias a atos administrativos normativos, no Brasil, para que elas, de fato, atendam aos seus pressupostos democráticos e legitimem o agir abstrato do Estado. Assim, são propostos, com base no marco teórico e nos dados coletados, elementos que devem ser observados quando da regulamentação e aplicação do instituto.Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)Fagundes, Gabriel Lima Miranda GonçalvesDuarte, Luciana Gaspar Melquíades2022-02-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigoapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/402110.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i34.p1-29.2022Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20, n. 34 (2022); 1-29Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20, n. 34 (2022); 1-29Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20, n. 34 (2022); 1-29Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20, n. 34 (2022); 1-292447-66411806-042010.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i34.2022reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:UNICHRISTUSporhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4021/1533https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4021/1552Brasil; América do Sul2019América LatinaDireitos autorais 2021 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-07-11T16:21:09Zoai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/4021Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridicaPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/oaiopiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br2447-66411806-0420opendoar:2022-07-11T16:21:09Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
LAS CONSULTAS PÚBLICAS COMO MECANISMO DE LEGITIMACIÓN DE LOS ACTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS NORMATIVOS
AS CONSULTAS PÚBLICAS ENQUANTO MECANISMO DE LEGITIMAÇÃO DOS ATOS ADMINISTRATIVOS NORMATIVOS
title PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
spellingShingle PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
Fagundes, Gabriel Lima Miranda Gonçalves
public consultation; procedure; participatory democracy; legitimation; normative administrative act
consulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimación; acto administrativo normativo
Direito; Direito Administrativo
consulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimação; ato administrativo normativo
Fagundes, Gabriel Lima Miranda Gonçalves
public consultation; procedure; participatory democracy; legitimation; normative administrative act
consulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimación; acto administrativo normativo
Direito; Direito Administrativo
consulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimação; ato administrativo normativo
title_short PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
title_full PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
title_fullStr PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
title_full_unstemmed PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
title_sort PUBLIC CONSULTATIONS AS A MECHANISM FOR LEGITIMIZING NORMATIVE ADMINISTRATIVE ACTS
author Fagundes, Gabriel Lima Miranda Gonçalves
author_facet Fagundes, Gabriel Lima Miranda Gonçalves
Fagundes, Gabriel Lima Miranda Gonçalves
Duarte, Luciana Gaspar Melquíades
Duarte, Luciana Gaspar Melquíades
author_role author
author2 Duarte, Luciana Gaspar Melquíades
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fagundes, Gabriel Lima Miranda Gonçalves
Duarte, Luciana Gaspar Melquíades
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv public consultation; procedure; participatory democracy; legitimation; normative administrative act
consulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimación; acto administrativo normativo
Direito; Direito Administrativo
consulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimação; ato administrativo normativo
topic public consultation; procedure; participatory democracy; legitimation; normative administrative act
consulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimación; acto administrativo normativo
Direito; Direito Administrativo
consulta pública; procedimento; democracia participativa; legitimação; ato administrativo normativo
description Objective: This paper is dedicated to the survey and analysis of the regulations of public consultations in Brazil and other Latin countries, formulating proposals to enable the democratic effectiveness of the institute in the administrative processes of creation of normative acts, encouraged by Law no. 13,655 (BRASIL, 2018), which amended the LINDB.Methodology: The empirical research employs documentary analysis of the legislation of Latin American countries with a socioeconomic reality close to that of Brazil to collect elements that enable the formulation of proposals for the effective application of the institute in Brazil. For this, eleven Latin countries were selected, whose legislations were consulted electronically by accessing the federal government sites, verifying the norms pointed out by the entities as regulating the public consultations. The theoretical framework was based on Jürgen Habermas's theory of proceduralist deliberative democracy, Hannah Arendt's concept of politics, and the constitutionalization of Administrative Law.Results: It was verified that there is an unsatisfactory regulation of the institute of public consultations in Brazil and in most of the researched countries, besides deducing that, thus, the institute has been used in a way to integrate only the legitimation rhetoric of the Public Administration, without properly fulfilling its democratic purpose.Contributions: The article contributes to the improvement of the regulation of public consultations in Brazil so that it actually meets its democratic assumptions and legitimizes normative administrative acts. Thus, based on the theoretical framework and the data collected, elements are proposed that should be observed when regulating and applying the institute.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-02-15
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv


dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4021
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i34.p1-29.2022
url https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4021
identifier_str_mv 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i34.p1-29.2022
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4021/1533
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/4021/1552
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2021 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2021 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv





Brasil; América do Sul
2019
América Latina
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20, n. 34 (2022); 1-29
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20, n. 34 (2022); 1-29
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20, n. 34 (2022); 1-29
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 20, n. 34 (2022); 1-29
2447-6641
1806-0420
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i34.2022
reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron:UNICHRISTUS
instname_str Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron_str UNICHRISTUS
institution UNICHRISTUS
reponame_str Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
collection Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv opiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br
_version_ 1822178717284171776
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v20i34.p1-29.2022