NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Weschenfelder, Lucas Reckziegel
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Friedrich, Denise Bittencourt
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2771
Resumo: The study of this research comprises the technology and its democratic possibilities, integrated to a debate on theories of democracy. Technology, in modernity, is seen as an instrument with which the agent communicates with his environment, and the critical theories developed that embrace it depart from two paths: that its potentiality is a mean of domination or that is capacity is neutral, based on its inherent scientific rationality. Democracy aims to integrate the interests of all, and from that, direct decision-making. The factor is complex, however, a compound is perennial: the manifestation and conveyance of an interest is a presupposition for such interest to be part of the political and legal system of society. It was intended to respond to the problem expressed as follows: is technological development limited to the terms of the instrumentalist and substantialist currents of technology in view of contemporary democratic plurality? Considering the relations of contemporary industrial society, technology possesses democratic impulses, once thinking it and integrating in its development the particularities of each person or group of people, as a means to enhance its content and its effects on society. The inclusion of people with disabilities in the digital sphere needs to be architected, as it encounters serious impediments, analogous to the physical sphere. The method of approach used was the hermeneutic one, starting from premises that consubstantiate in the problem. The procedure method used was the monographic and the research technique, bibliographical.
id CHRISTUS-2_bbc466239d9948b67fc89d16df976440
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/2771
network_acronym_str CHRISTUS-2
network_name_str Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
repository_id_str
spelling NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONSNOTAS SOBRE LA RELEITURA DE FEENBERG SOBRE LA TEORÍA CRÍTICA DE LA TECNOLOGÍA: UNA PROPUESTA DE DEMOCRATIZACIÓN DEL DESARROLLO TECNOLÓGICO EN LA ESFERA DIGITAL COMO PREMISA DE TRANSFORMACIONES DEMOCRÁTICASNOTAS SOBRE A RELEITURA DE FEENBERG A RESPEITO DA TEORIA CRÍTICA DA TECNOLOGIA: UMA PROPOSTA DE DEMOCRATIZAÇÃO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO TECNOLÓGICO NA ESFERA DIGITAL COMO PREMISSA DE TRANSFORMAÇÕES DEMOCRÁTICASDemocracy; Industrial Society; Critical Theory; TechnologyDemocracia; Sociedad Industrial; Teoría Crítica; TecnologíaDireitoDemocracia; Sociedade Industrial; Teoria Crítica; TecnologiaThe study of this research comprises the technology and its democratic possibilities, integrated to a debate on theories of democracy. Technology, in modernity, is seen as an instrument with which the agent communicates with his environment, and the critical theories developed that embrace it depart from two paths: that its potentiality is a mean of domination or that is capacity is neutral, based on its inherent scientific rationality. Democracy aims to integrate the interests of all, and from that, direct decision-making. The factor is complex, however, a compound is perennial: the manifestation and conveyance of an interest is a presupposition for such interest to be part of the political and legal system of society. It was intended to respond to the problem expressed as follows: is technological development limited to the terms of the instrumentalist and substantialist currents of technology in view of contemporary democratic plurality? Considering the relations of contemporary industrial society, technology possesses democratic impulses, once thinking it and integrating in its development the particularities of each person or group of people, as a means to enhance its content and its effects on society. The inclusion of people with disabilities in the digital sphere needs to be architected, as it encounters serious impediments, analogous to the physical sphere. The method of approach used was the hermeneutic one, starting from premises that consubstantiate in the problem. The procedure method used was the monographic and the research technique, bibliographical.El estudio de esta investigación comprende la tecnología y sus posibilidades democráticas, integrado a un debate sobre las teorías de la democracia. La tecnología, en la modernidad, se sitúa como un instrumento con el que el agente se comunica con su medio, y las teorías críticas desarrolladas que la abarcan parten de dos caminos: donde su potencialidad es un medio de dominación, o que su capacidad es neutra, basada en una racionalidad científica inherente. La democracia tiene como propósito integrar los intereses de todos y, a partir de eso,dirigir las tomas de decisiones. El factor es complejo, sin embargo, un compuesto es perenne: la manifestación y difusión de un interés es un presupuesto para que tal interés forme parte del sistema político y jurídico de la sociedad. Se pretendió responder al problema expresado de la siguiente forma: el desarrollo tecnológico se limita a los términos de las corrientes instrumentalista y sustancialista de la tecnología, teniendo en vista la pluralidad democrática contemporánea? Considerando las relaciones de la sociedad industrial contemporánea, la tecnología posee propulsores democráticos, una vez pensando y integrando, en su desarrollo, las particularidades de cada persona o grupo de personas, como medio de potenciar su contenido y sus efectos en la sociedad. La inclusión de un sistema de gestión de la comunicación en la esfera digital debe ser arquitetada, pois encontra sérios impedimentos, análogos à esfera física. El método de abordaje empleado fue el hermenéutico, partiendo de premisas que se consubstancian en el problema. El método de procedimiento utilizado fue el monográfico y la técnica de investigación, bibliográfica.O estudo desta pesquisa compreende a tecnologia e as suas possibilidades democráticas, integrado a um debate sobre as teorias da democracia. A tecnologia, na modernidade, encontra-se posta como um instrumento com o qual o agente se comunica com o seu meio, e as teorias críticas clássicas que a abarcam partem de dois caminhos: onde a sua potencialidade é um meio de dominação, ou que a sua capacidade é neutra, baseada em uma racionalidade científica inerente. A democracia tem como propósito integrar os interesses de todos e, a partir disso, direcionar as tomadas de decisões. O fator é complexo, porém um composto é perene: a manifestação e a veiculação de um interesse é um pressuposto para que tal interesse faça parte do sistema político e jurídico da sociedade. Pretendeu-se responder ao problema expresso da seguinte forma: o desenvolvimento tecnológico se limita aos termos das correntes instrumentalista e substancialista da tecnologia, tendo em vista a pluralidade democrática contemporânea? Considerando as relações da sociedade industrial contemporânea, a tecnologia possui propulsores democráticos, uma vez pensando-a e integrando, em seu desenvolvimento, as particularidades de cada pessoa ou grupo de pessoas, como meio de potencializar o seu conteúdo e os seus efeitos na sociedade. A inclusão das pessoas com deficiência na esfera digital precisa ser arquitetada, pois encontra sérios impedimentos, análogos à esfera física. O método de abordagem empregado foi o hermenêutico, partindo de premissas que se consubstanciam no problema. O método de procedimento utilizado foi o monográfico, e a técnica de pesquisa, bibliográfica.Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)Weschenfelder, Lucas ReckziegelFriedrich, Denise Bittencourt2020-04-22info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigoapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/277110.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i28.p13-42.2020Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 18, n. 28 (2020); 13-42Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 18, n. 28 (2020); 13-42Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 18, n. 28 (2020); 13-42Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 18, n. 28 (2020); 13-422447-66411806-042010.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i28.2020reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)instacron:UNICHRISTUSporhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2771/1094https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2771/1151MundialDireitos autorais 2019 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-10-30T17:29:57Zoai:ojs.unichristus.emnuvens.com.br:article/2771Revistahttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridicaPRIhttps://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/oaiopiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br2447-66411806-0420opendoar:2020-10-30T17:29:57Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONS
NOTAS SOBRE LA RELEITURA DE FEENBERG SOBRE LA TEORÍA CRÍTICA DE LA TECNOLOGÍA: UNA PROPUESTA DE DEMOCRATIZACIÓN DEL DESARROLLO TECNOLÓGICO EN LA ESFERA DIGITAL COMO PREMISA DE TRANSFORMACIONES DEMOCRÁTICAS
NOTAS SOBRE A RELEITURA DE FEENBERG A RESPEITO DA TEORIA CRÍTICA DA TECNOLOGIA: UMA PROPOSTA DE DEMOCRATIZAÇÃO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO TECNOLÓGICO NA ESFERA DIGITAL COMO PREMISSA DE TRANSFORMAÇÕES DEMOCRÁTICAS
title NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONS
spellingShingle NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONS
Weschenfelder, Lucas Reckziegel
Democracy; Industrial Society; Critical Theory; Technology
Democracia; Sociedad Industrial; Teoría Crítica; Tecnología
Direito
Democracia; Sociedade Industrial; Teoria Crítica; Tecnologia
title_short NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONS
title_full NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONS
title_fullStr NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONS
title_full_unstemmed NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONS
title_sort NOTES ON FEENBERG’S RELEASE ON THE CRITICAL THEORY OF TECHNOLOGY: A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEMOCRATIZATION OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE DIGITAL SPHERE AS A PREMISE FOR DEMOCRATIC TRANSFORMATIONS
author Weschenfelder, Lucas Reckziegel
author_facet Weschenfelder, Lucas Reckziegel
Friedrich, Denise Bittencourt
author_role author
author2 Friedrich, Denise Bittencourt
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv


dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Weschenfelder, Lucas Reckziegel
Friedrich, Denise Bittencourt
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv

dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Democracy; Industrial Society; Critical Theory; Technology
Democracia; Sociedad Industrial; Teoría Crítica; Tecnología
Direito
Democracia; Sociedade Industrial; Teoria Crítica; Tecnologia
topic Democracy; Industrial Society; Critical Theory; Technology
Democracia; Sociedad Industrial; Teoría Crítica; Tecnología
Direito
Democracia; Sociedade Industrial; Teoria Crítica; Tecnologia
description The study of this research comprises the technology and its democratic possibilities, integrated to a debate on theories of democracy. Technology, in modernity, is seen as an instrument with which the agent communicates with his environment, and the critical theories developed that embrace it depart from two paths: that its potentiality is a mean of domination or that is capacity is neutral, based on its inherent scientific rationality. Democracy aims to integrate the interests of all, and from that, direct decision-making. The factor is complex, however, a compound is perennial: the manifestation and conveyance of an interest is a presupposition for such interest to be part of the political and legal system of society. It was intended to respond to the problem expressed as follows: is technological development limited to the terms of the instrumentalist and substantialist currents of technology in view of contemporary democratic plurality? Considering the relations of contemporary industrial society, technology possesses democratic impulses, once thinking it and integrating in its development the particularities of each person or group of people, as a means to enhance its content and its effects on society. The inclusion of people with disabilities in the digital sphere needs to be architected, as it encounters serious impediments, analogous to the physical sphere. The method of approach used was the hermeneutic one, starting from premises that consubstantiate in the problem. The procedure method used was the monographic and the research technique, bibliographical.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-04-22
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv


dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2771
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i28.p13-42.2020
url https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2771
identifier_str_mv 10.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i28.p13-42.2020
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2771/1094
https://periodicos.unichristus.edu.br/opiniaojuridica/article/view/2771/1151
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2019 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2019 Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv





Mundial


dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto para o Desenvolvimento da Educacao (Centro Universitário Christus - Unichristus)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 18, n. 28 (2020); 13-42
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 18, n. 28 (2020); 13-42
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 18, n. 28 (2020); 13-42
Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza); v. 18, n. 28 (2020); 13-42
2447-6641
1806-0420
10.12662/2447-6641oj.v18i28.2020
reponame:Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
instname:Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron:UNICHRISTUS
instname_str Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
instacron_str UNICHRISTUS
institution UNICHRISTUS
reponame_str Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
collection Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Opinião Jurídica (Fortaleza) - Centro Universitário Christus (Unichristus)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv opiniaojuridica01@unichristus.edu.br || secretaria.oj@unichristus.edu.br
_version_ 1797052897721057280