Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silveira, Daniel Barile da
Data de Publicação: 2016
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472
Resumo: The purpose of this article is: a) understand how was the distribution of constitutional powers of the Supreme Court in the light of legacy brought by the 88’s Constitution; ii) identify how is the use of these skills in order to indicate predominance, successes and difficulties of your procedural management. From the theoretical understanding of its constitutional powers, contrasted in the face of extracted usual judicial practice of quantitative studies on its procedural flow, we seek to understand what were the paths that constructed the Court's competence profile in the first quarter century (1988- 2012).
id CONPEDI-12_55ccabd6720ddd1f5b60e28ec2221061
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/472
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-12
network_name_str Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
repository_id_str
spelling Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 ConstitutionCompetências, Volume Processual e Julgamento Seletivo: Uma Análise sobre a Construção do Papel Jurisdicional do Supremo Tribunal Federal na Constituição da República de 1988Judicial competence of the brazilian’s supreme court; Processual abundance; Selective judgmentCompetências do supremo tribunal federal; Volume processual; Julgamento seletivoThe purpose of this article is: a) understand how was the distribution of constitutional powers of the Supreme Court in the light of legacy brought by the 88’s Constitution; ii) identify how is the use of these skills in order to indicate predominance, successes and difficulties of your procedural management. From the theoretical understanding of its constitutional powers, contrasted in the face of extracted usual judicial practice of quantitative studies on its procedural flow, we seek to understand what were the paths that constructed the Court's competence profile in the first quarter century (1988- 2012).O  propósito  deste  artigo  é:  i)  entender  como  se  deu  a  distribuição  das  competências constitucionais do STF à luz do legado trazido pela Carta de 88; ii) identificar como se dá o uso dessas competências, no sentido de indicar predominâncias, acertos e dificuldades de seu gerenciamento  processual.  A  partir  da  compreensão  teórica  sobre  sua  competência constitucional, contrastada em face da prática jurisdicional habitual extraída de estudos quantitativos sobre seu fluxo processual, busca-se entender quais foram os caminhos que ladrilharam o perfil da competência do Tribunal no primeiro quarto de século (1988-2012).Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDISilveira, Daniel Barile da2016-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/47210.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2016.v2i1.472Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 90-1142525-98222525-9822reponame:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiçainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472/470Direitos autorais 2016 Daniel Barile da Silveirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-02-17T21:44:10Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/472Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciariaPRIhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-98222525-9822opendoar:2017-02-17T21:44:10Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution
Competências, Volume Processual e Julgamento Seletivo: Uma Análise sobre a Construção do Papel Jurisdicional do Supremo Tribunal Federal na Constituição da República de 1988
title Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution
spellingShingle Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution
Silveira, Daniel Barile da
Judicial competence of the brazilian’s supreme court; Processual abundance; Selective judgment
Competências do supremo tribunal federal; Volume processual; Julgamento seletivo
title_short Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution
title_full Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution
title_fullStr Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution
title_full_unstemmed Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution
title_sort Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution
author Silveira, Daniel Barile da
author_facet Silveira, Daniel Barile da
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silveira, Daniel Barile da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Judicial competence of the brazilian’s supreme court; Processual abundance; Selective judgment
Competências do supremo tribunal federal; Volume processual; Julgamento seletivo
topic Judicial competence of the brazilian’s supreme court; Processual abundance; Selective judgment
Competências do supremo tribunal federal; Volume processual; Julgamento seletivo
description The purpose of this article is: a) understand how was the distribution of constitutional powers of the Supreme Court in the light of legacy brought by the 88’s Constitution; ii) identify how is the use of these skills in order to indicate predominance, successes and difficulties of your procedural management. From the theoretical understanding of its constitutional powers, contrasted in the face of extracted usual judicial practice of quantitative studies on its procedural flow, we seek to understand what were the paths that constructed the Court's competence profile in the first quarter century (1988- 2012).
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-10-14
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2016.v2i1.472
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2016.v2i1.472
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472/470
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Daniel Barile da Silveira
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Daniel Barile da Silveira
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 90-114
2525-9822
2525-9822
reponame:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
collection Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com
_version_ 1808857238124625920