Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this article is: a) understand how was the distribution of constitutional powers of the Supreme Court in the light of legacy brought by the 88’s Constitution; ii) identify how is the use of these skills in order to indicate predominance, successes and difficulties of your procedural management. From the theoretical understanding of its constitutional powers, contrasted in the face of extracted usual judicial practice of quantitative studies on its procedural flow, we seek to understand what were the paths that constructed the Court's competence profile in the first quarter century (1988- 2012). |
id |
CONPEDI-12_55ccabd6720ddd1f5b60e28ec2221061 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/472 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-12 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 ConstitutionCompetências, Volume Processual e Julgamento Seletivo: Uma Análise sobre a Construção do Papel Jurisdicional do Supremo Tribunal Federal na Constituição da República de 1988Judicial competence of the brazilian’s supreme court; Processual abundance; Selective judgmentCompetências do supremo tribunal federal; Volume processual; Julgamento seletivoThe purpose of this article is: a) understand how was the distribution of constitutional powers of the Supreme Court in the light of legacy brought by the 88’s Constitution; ii) identify how is the use of these skills in order to indicate predominance, successes and difficulties of your procedural management. From the theoretical understanding of its constitutional powers, contrasted in the face of extracted usual judicial practice of quantitative studies on its procedural flow, we seek to understand what were the paths that constructed the Court's competence profile in the first quarter century (1988- 2012).O propósito deste artigo é: i) entender como se deu a distribuição das competências constitucionais do STF à luz do legado trazido pela Carta de 88; ii) identificar como se dá o uso dessas competências, no sentido de indicar predominâncias, acertos e dificuldades de seu gerenciamento processual. A partir da compreensão teórica sobre sua competência constitucional, contrastada em face da prática jurisdicional habitual extraída de estudos quantitativos sobre seu fluxo processual, busca-se entender quais foram os caminhos que ladrilharam o perfil da competência do Tribunal no primeiro quarto de século (1988-2012).Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDISilveira, Daniel Barile da2016-10-14info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/47210.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2016.v2i1.472Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 90-1142525-98222525-9822reponame:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiçainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472/470Direitos autorais 2016 Daniel Barile da Silveirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-02-17T21:44:10Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/472Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciariaPRIhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-98222525-9822opendoar:2017-02-17T21:44:10Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution Competências, Volume Processual e Julgamento Seletivo: Uma Análise sobre a Construção do Papel Jurisdicional do Supremo Tribunal Federal na Constituição da República de 1988 |
title |
Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution |
spellingShingle |
Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution Silveira, Daniel Barile da Judicial competence of the brazilian’s supreme court; Processual abundance; Selective judgment Competências do supremo tribunal federal; Volume processual; Julgamento seletivo |
title_short |
Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution |
title_full |
Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution |
title_fullStr |
Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution |
title_sort |
Judicial Competence, Processual Abundance and Selective Judgement: An Analysis of the Construction of Judicial Role of the Supreme Court in the Brazilian’s 1998 Constitution |
author |
Silveira, Daniel Barile da |
author_facet |
Silveira, Daniel Barile da |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silveira, Daniel Barile da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Judicial competence of the brazilian’s supreme court; Processual abundance; Selective judgment Competências do supremo tribunal federal; Volume processual; Julgamento seletivo |
topic |
Judicial competence of the brazilian’s supreme court; Processual abundance; Selective judgment Competências do supremo tribunal federal; Volume processual; Julgamento seletivo |
description |
The purpose of this article is: a) understand how was the distribution of constitutional powers of the Supreme Court in the light of legacy brought by the 88’s Constitution; ii) identify how is the use of these skills in order to indicate predominance, successes and difficulties of your procedural management. From the theoretical understanding of its constitutional powers, contrasted in the face of extracted usual judicial practice of quantitative studies on its procedural flow, we seek to understand what were the paths that constructed the Court's competence profile in the first quarter century (1988- 2012). |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-10-14 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2016.v2i1.472 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9822/2016.v2i1.472 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistapoliticiajudiciaria/article/view/472/470 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Daniel Barile da Silveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Daniel Barile da Silveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça; v. 2, n. 1 (2016): JANEIRO/JUNHO; 90-114 2525-9822 2525-9822 reponame:Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça |
collection |
Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Política Judiciária, Gestão e Administração da Justiça - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1808857238124625920 |