FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988.
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticos |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasdemocracia/article/view/739 |
Resumo: | The recognition of human rights by the contemporary Constitutions, in fundamental rights form, took the positive constitutional systems to incorporate ethical, moral and evaluative contents, with evident repercussions on its normative effectiveness. This fact, as well as the change of the social, economic and cultural context of the last quarter of the 20th century, led to emerge a new modality of democracy: the so-called deliberative democracy (or participative). The relationship between "deliberative democracy" and "fundamental rights" remains evident by the circumstance that in contemporary democracies the public deliberation lends itself not only to allow the society, in a democratic way, could define which are the rights that are considered as fundamental, but also to establish the contours, the limits and the scope of these fundamental rights. In addition, the crisis of social constitutionalism shifted to the Judiciary the monopoly of the last word in constitutional interpretation, provoking the loss of distinctness between politics and law. Although the Federal Constitution of 1988 (CF) have made substantial choices with greater intensity than those related to procedural mechanisms of democracy, the increase of our social complexity, the insufficiency of the institutional political system to attend the social and collective demands and the emergence of a new virtual public space, allows us to identify that also in Brazil the contemporary debate on deliberative democracy has importance to the law. |
id |
CONPEDI-16_067ad115dded12d419ad7021a5bbef35 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/739 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticos |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988.From a Representative Democracy to A Deliberative Democracy. Some Notes About the Importance Of a Procedural Basement of Fundamental Rights of The Federal Constitution of 1988.Human rights; Fundamental rights; Representative democracy; Deliberative democracyThe recognition of human rights by the contemporary Constitutions, in fundamental rights form, took the positive constitutional systems to incorporate ethical, moral and evaluative contents, with evident repercussions on its normative effectiveness. This fact, as well as the change of the social, economic and cultural context of the last quarter of the 20th century, led to emerge a new modality of democracy: the so-called deliberative democracy (or participative). The relationship between "deliberative democracy" and "fundamental rights" remains evident by the circumstance that in contemporary democracies the public deliberation lends itself not only to allow the society, in a democratic way, could define which are the rights that are considered as fundamental, but also to establish the contours, the limits and the scope of these fundamental rights. In addition, the crisis of social constitutionalism shifted to the Judiciary the monopoly of the last word in constitutional interpretation, provoking the loss of distinctness between politics and law. Although the Federal Constitution of 1988 (CF) have made substantial choices with greater intensity than those related to procedural mechanisms of democracy, the increase of our social complexity, the insufficiency of the institutional political system to attend the social and collective demands and the emergence of a new virtual public space, allows us to identify that also in Brazil the contemporary debate on deliberative democracy has importance to the law.A positivação de direitos humanos nas Constituições contemporâneas, sob a forma de direitos fundamentais, levou os sistemas constitucionais positivos a incorporar conteúdos éticos, morais e valorativos, com evidentes repercussões em sua eficácia normativa. Tal fato, bem como a mudança do contexto social, econômico e cultural do último quarto do século XX, propiciou o surgimento de uma nova modalidade de democracia: a chamada democracia deliberativa (ou participativa). A relação entre democracia deliberativa e direitos fundamentais resta evidenciada pela circunstância de que nas democracias contemporâneas a deliberação pública se presta não somente a permitir que a sociedade, de forma democrática, possa definir quais são os direitos que são tidos por fundamentais, mas também estabelecer os contornos, os limites e o alcance destes direitos fundamentais. Além disso, a crise do constitucionalismo social deslocou para o Poder Judiciário o monopólio da última palavra na interpretação constitucional, provocando a perda de nitidez entre a política e o direito. Apesar da Constituição Federal de 1988 (CF) ter feito escolhas substanciais com maior intensidade que as relativas aos mecanismos procedimentais da democracia, o aumento da nossa complexidade social, a insuficiência do sistema político institucional para atender as demandas sociais e coletivas e a emergência de um novo espaço público virtual, permite-nos identificar que também no Brasil o debate contemporâneo sobre a democracia deliberativa tem importância para o direito.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIMartins, Flademir Jeronimo BelinatiVecchiatti, Paulo Roberto Iotti2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasdemocracia/article/view/73910.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9660/2015.v1i1.739Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticos; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 51-812525-96602525-9660reponame:Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticosinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasdemocracia/article/view/739/pdfDireitos autorais 2016 Flademir Jeronimo Belinati Martins, Paulo Roberto Iotti Vecchiattihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-21T04:35:50Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/739Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasdemocraciaaONGhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasdemocracia/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96602525-9660opendoar:2018-02-21T04:35:50Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticos - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988. From a Representative Democracy to A Deliberative Democracy. Some Notes About the Importance Of a Procedural Basement of Fundamental Rights of The Federal Constitution of 1988. |
title |
FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988. |
spellingShingle |
FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988. Martins, Flademir Jeronimo Belinati Human rights; Fundamental rights; Representative democracy; Deliberative democracy |
title_short |
FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988. |
title_full |
FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988. |
title_fullStr |
FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988. |
title_full_unstemmed |
FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988. |
title_sort |
FROM A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY TO A DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY. SOME NOTES ABOUT THE IMPORTANCE OF A PROCEDURAL BASEMENT OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION OF 1988. |
author |
Martins, Flademir Jeronimo Belinati |
author_facet |
Martins, Flademir Jeronimo Belinati Vecchiatti, Paulo Roberto Iotti |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Vecchiatti, Paulo Roberto Iotti |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Flademir Jeronimo Belinati Vecchiatti, Paulo Roberto Iotti |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Human rights; Fundamental rights; Representative democracy; Deliberative democracy |
topic |
Human rights; Fundamental rights; Representative democracy; Deliberative democracy |
description |
The recognition of human rights by the contemporary Constitutions, in fundamental rights form, took the positive constitutional systems to incorporate ethical, moral and evaluative contents, with evident repercussions on its normative effectiveness. This fact, as well as the change of the social, economic and cultural context of the last quarter of the 20th century, led to emerge a new modality of democracy: the so-called deliberative democracy (or participative). The relationship between "deliberative democracy" and "fundamental rights" remains evident by the circumstance that in contemporary democracies the public deliberation lends itself not only to allow the society, in a democratic way, could define which are the rights that are considered as fundamental, but also to establish the contours, the limits and the scope of these fundamental rights. In addition, the crisis of social constitutionalism shifted to the Judiciary the monopoly of the last word in constitutional interpretation, provoking the loss of distinctness between politics and law. Although the Federal Constitution of 1988 (CF) have made substantial choices with greater intensity than those related to procedural mechanisms of democracy, the increase of our social complexity, the insufficiency of the institutional political system to attend the social and collective demands and the emergence of a new virtual public space, allows us to identify that also in Brazil the contemporary debate on deliberative democracy has importance to the law. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasdemocracia/article/view/739 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9660/2015.v1i1.739 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasdemocracia/article/view/739 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9660/2015.v1i1.739 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/revistateoriasdemocracia/article/view/739/pdf |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Flademir Jeronimo Belinati Martins, Paulo Roberto Iotti Vecchiatti http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Flademir Jeronimo Belinati Martins, Paulo Roberto Iotti Vecchiatti http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticos; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 51-81 2525-9660 2525-9660 reponame:Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticos instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticos |
collection |
Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticos |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Teorias da Democracia e Direitos Políticos - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798316713547137024 |