How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal Decisions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/217 |
Resumo: | The aim of this paper is to present, basically, the judge's behavior throught three different perspectives: the political, the legal and the realistic points of view. From the political point of view, Law is seen as an instrument used to get to a certain goal, and the subject is only the agent that causes consequences on the community. How to get to a certain goal? From the legal point of view, even though it is possible to, using policy, reinforce the necessary instruments of the legal order,it should not interfere in policy, but should be built according to institucionalized principles and law. The perspective of what should be precedes the subject, in a way that the subject, from the legal point of view, is the one that should or shouldn't do something. Both political and legal point of view start from the abstract subject, the subject that acts as his will (policy) or the legal law (Law). This is why the third perspective, the realistic point of view, describes the real subject, while the real man, inserted in the social order, acts in the legal decisions. Because of that, the present paper presents notes about the judge's behavior in the three perspectives shown. |
id |
CONPEDI-18_00d095dd426c6c4f07e20dabb747214d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/217 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-18 |
network_name_str |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal DecisionsComo os Juízes Decidem? Notas e Apontamentos Sobre o Comportamento na Decisão JudicialBehavior; Decision; JudgeComportamento; Decisão; JuizThe aim of this paper is to present, basically, the judge's behavior throught three different perspectives: the political, the legal and the realistic points of view. From the political point of view, Law is seen as an instrument used to get to a certain goal, and the subject is only the agent that causes consequences on the community. How to get to a certain goal? From the legal point of view, even though it is possible to, using policy, reinforce the necessary instruments of the legal order,it should not interfere in policy, but should be built according to institucionalized principles and law. The perspective of what should be precedes the subject, in a way that the subject, from the legal point of view, is the one that should or shouldn't do something. Both political and legal point of view start from the abstract subject, the subject that acts as his will (policy) or the legal law (Law). This is why the third perspective, the realistic point of view, describes the real subject, while the real man, inserted in the social order, acts in the legal decisions. Because of that, the present paper presents notes about the judge's behavior in the three perspectives shown.O presente ensaio tem como objetivo apresentar, basicamente, três perspectivas que procuram explicar e descrever o comportamento judicial: o ponto de vista político, o ponto de vista jurídico e o ponto de vista realista. Do ponto de vista político, o direito é visto como um instrumento pelo qual se atinge determinado fim e o sujeito é apenas o agente que dá ensejo à finalidade que repercute na coletividade. Como se atinge determinado fim? Do ponto de vista jurídico, embora pela política se consolide os instrumentos necessários à ordem jurídica, esta não deve interferir na política e sim ser construída conforme normas e princípios institucionalizados. A ótica do dever ser precede o sujeito, de modo que o sujeito, do ponto de vista jurídico, é aquele que deve ou não deve fazer algo. Tanto do ponto de vista político quanto do ponto de vista jurídico partem do sujeito abstrato, do sujeito que age conforme manda sua vontade (política) ou a norma jurídica (direito). Por isso que a terceira perspectiva, o ponto de vista realista, descreve o sujeito real, enquanto homem físico inserido na ordem social, comporta-se nas decisões judiciais. Assim, o presente ensaio apresenta notas e apontamentos do comportamento judicial nas perspectivas descritas.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIAbras Oliveira, Rafael Guimarães2015-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/21710.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9601/2015.v1i1.217Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 58-792525-96012525-9601reponame:Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídicoinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/217/219Direitos autorais 2016 Rafael Guimarães Abras Oliveirahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-18T03:25:00Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/217Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/indexPRIhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/oai||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2525-96012525-9601opendoar:2018-02-18T03:25Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal Decisions Como os Juízes Decidem? Notas e Apontamentos Sobre o Comportamento na Decisão Judicial |
title |
How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal Decisions |
spellingShingle |
How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal Decisions Abras Oliveira, Rafael Guimarães Behavior; Decision; Judge Comportamento; Decisão; Juiz |
title_short |
How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal Decisions |
title_full |
How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal Decisions |
title_fullStr |
How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal Decisions |
title_full_unstemmed |
How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal Decisions |
title_sort |
How do Judges Make their Decisions? Notes about the Behavior in Legal Decisions |
author |
Abras Oliveira, Rafael Guimarães |
author_facet |
Abras Oliveira, Rafael Guimarães |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abras Oliveira, Rafael Guimarães |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Behavior; Decision; Judge Comportamento; Decisão; Juiz |
topic |
Behavior; Decision; Judge Comportamento; Decisão; Juiz |
description |
The aim of this paper is to present, basically, the judge's behavior throught three different perspectives: the political, the legal and the realistic points of view. From the political point of view, Law is seen as an instrument used to get to a certain goal, and the subject is only the agent that causes consequences on the community. How to get to a certain goal? From the legal point of view, even though it is possible to, using policy, reinforce the necessary instruments of the legal order,it should not interfere in policy, but should be built according to institucionalized principles and law. The perspective of what should be precedes the subject, in a way that the subject, from the legal point of view, is the one that should or shouldn't do something. Both political and legal point of view start from the abstract subject, the subject that acts as his will (policy) or the legal law (Law). This is why the third perspective, the realistic point of view, describes the real subject, while the real man, inserted in the social order, acts in the legal decisions. Because of that, the present paper presents notes about the judge's behavior in the three perspectives shown. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/217 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9601/2015.v1i1.217 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/217 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2525-9601/2015.v1i1.217 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/teoriasdireito/article/view/217/219 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Rafael Guimarães Abras Oliveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Rafael Guimarães Abras Oliveira http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 58-79 2525-9601 2525-9601 reponame:Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico |
collection |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Teorias do Direito e Realismo Jurídico - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1798316734463082496 |