WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Marcelo Maciel
Data de Publicação: 2015
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203
Resumo: This paper proposes a study on the normative tradition of imperial China in the context of its perceptions on mankind and nature. Its linguistic, intellectual and ethical peculiarities are taken into consideration in order to explain the reasons why liberty hasnt been a concern in classical Chinese culture. The notion is not only absent from the debates of the great Chinese thinkers, but also one cannot find in classical Chinese an ideogram that matches the idea. Why liberty, which is so constitutive of the imaginary and the prevailing discourses in the Western cultures, were absent in a civilization as sophisticated as the Chinese? In order to answer that question, we sought to expose the prevailing characteristics of imperial Chinas normativity, trying to demonstrate how its perceptions on mankind and nature tend to resist and to distance themselves from what, in the Western civilization, was thought as liberty.
id CONPEDI-24_60280179b9a679fc1355d1be7d33941c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/203
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-24
network_name_str Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
repository_id_str
spelling WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?POR QUE A CHINA IMPERIAL NÃO PENSOU A LIBERDADE? NOTAS SOBRE AS PECULIARIDADES DA TRADIÇÃO NORMATIVA CHINESAImperial china, Chinese normativity, Confucianism, LibertyChina imperial, Normatividade chinesa, Confucionismo, LiberdadeThis paper proposes a study on the normative tradition of imperial China in the context of its perceptions on mankind and nature. Its linguistic, intellectual and ethical peculiarities are taken into consideration in order to explain the reasons why liberty hasnt been a concern in classical Chinese culture. The notion is not only absent from the debates of the great Chinese thinkers, but also one cannot find in classical Chinese an ideogram that matches the idea. Why liberty, which is so constitutive of the imaginary and the prevailing discourses in the Western cultures, were absent in a civilization as sophisticated as the Chinese? In order to answer that question, we sought to expose the prevailing characteristics of imperial Chinas normativity, trying to demonstrate how its perceptions on mankind and nature tend to resist and to distance themselves from what, in the Western civilization, was thought as liberty.O presente artigo tem como objeto a tradição normativa da China imperial no contexto de suas percepções sobre o homem e o mundo. A partir de um exame de suas peculiaridades linguísticas, intelectuais e éticas, busca-se compreender as razões pelas quais não se teria produzido na cultura chinesa clássica uma preocupação com a liberdade. A noção não só está ausente dos debates dos grandes pensadores chineses, como não se encontrará na língua chinesa clássica nenhum ideograma que corresponda à ideia. Por que a liberdade, que é tão constitutiva do imaginário e dos discursos prevalecentes no Ocidente, esteve ausente em uma civilização  tão  sofisticada  e  longeva  como  a  chinesa?  Para  responder  essa  questão, procuramos expor neste trabalho as características prevalecentes da normatividade da China imperial, tentando demonstrar como as suas percepções sobre o homem e o mundo resistem e se distanciam daquilo que no Ocidente se pensou como liberdade.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIRamos, Marcelo Maciel2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/20310.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2015.v1i1.203Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO2526-02512526-0251reponame:Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídicainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203/205Direitos autorais 2016 Marcelo Maciel Ramoshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-20T01:29:39Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/203Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/ONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br2526-02512526-0251opendoar:2021-08-20T01:29:39Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?
POR QUE A CHINA IMPERIAL NÃO PENSOU A LIBERDADE? NOTAS SOBRE AS PECULIARIDADES DA TRADIÇÃO NORMATIVA CHINESA
title WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?
spellingShingle WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?
Ramos, Marcelo Maciel
Imperial china, Chinese normativity, Confucianism, Liberty
China imperial, Normatividade chinesa, Confucionismo, Liberdade
title_short WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?
title_full WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?
title_fullStr WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?
title_full_unstemmed WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?
title_sort WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?
author Ramos, Marcelo Maciel
author_facet Ramos, Marcelo Maciel
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Marcelo Maciel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Imperial china, Chinese normativity, Confucianism, Liberty
China imperial, Normatividade chinesa, Confucionismo, Liberdade
topic Imperial china, Chinese normativity, Confucianism, Liberty
China imperial, Normatividade chinesa, Confucionismo, Liberdade
description This paper proposes a study on the normative tradition of imperial China in the context of its perceptions on mankind and nature. Its linguistic, intellectual and ethical peculiarities are taken into consideration in order to explain the reasons why liberty hasnt been a concern in classical Chinese culture. The notion is not only absent from the debates of the great Chinese thinkers, but also one cannot find in classical Chinese an ideogram that matches the idea. Why liberty, which is so constitutive of the imaginary and the prevailing discourses in the Western cultures, were absent in a civilization as sophisticated as the Chinese? In order to answer that question, we sought to expose the prevailing characteristics of imperial Chinas normativity, trying to demonstrate how its perceptions on mankind and nature tend to resist and to distance themselves from what, in the Western civilization, was thought as liberty.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2015.v1i1.203
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2015.v1i1.203
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203/205
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Marcelo Maciel Ramos
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Marcelo Maciel Ramos
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO
2526-0251
2526-0251
reponame:Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
collection Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br
_version_ 1798314867869876224