WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica |
Texto Completo: | http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203 |
Resumo: | This paper proposes a study on the normative tradition of imperial China in the context of its perceptions on mankind and nature. Its linguistic, intellectual and ethical peculiarities are taken into consideration in order to explain the reasons why liberty hasnt been a concern in classical Chinese culture. The notion is not only absent from the debates of the great Chinese thinkers, but also one cannot find in classical Chinese an ideogram that matches the idea. Why liberty, which is so constitutive of the imaginary and the prevailing discourses in the Western cultures, were absent in a civilization as sophisticated as the Chinese? In order to answer that question, we sought to expose the prevailing characteristics of imperial Chinas normativity, trying to demonstrate how its perceptions on mankind and nature tend to resist and to distance themselves from what, in the Western civilization, was thought as liberty. |
id |
CONPEDI-24_60280179b9a679fc1355d1be7d33941c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/203 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-24 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY?POR QUE A CHINA IMPERIAL NÃO PENSOU A LIBERDADE? NOTAS SOBRE AS PECULIARIDADES DA TRADIÇÃO NORMATIVA CHINESAImperial china, Chinese normativity, Confucianism, LibertyChina imperial, Normatividade chinesa, Confucionismo, LiberdadeThis paper proposes a study on the normative tradition of imperial China in the context of its perceptions on mankind and nature. Its linguistic, intellectual and ethical peculiarities are taken into consideration in order to explain the reasons why liberty hasnt been a concern in classical Chinese culture. The notion is not only absent from the debates of the great Chinese thinkers, but also one cannot find in classical Chinese an ideogram that matches the idea. Why liberty, which is so constitutive of the imaginary and the prevailing discourses in the Western cultures, were absent in a civilization as sophisticated as the Chinese? In order to answer that question, we sought to expose the prevailing characteristics of imperial Chinas normativity, trying to demonstrate how its perceptions on mankind and nature tend to resist and to distance themselves from what, in the Western civilization, was thought as liberty.O presente artigo tem como objeto a tradição normativa da China imperial no contexto de suas percepções sobre o homem e o mundo. A partir de um exame de suas peculiaridades linguísticas, intelectuais e éticas, busca-se compreender as razões pelas quais não se teria produzido na cultura chinesa clássica uma preocupação com a liberdade. A noção não só está ausente dos debates dos grandes pensadores chineses, como não se encontrará na língua chinesa clássica nenhum ideograma que corresponda à ideia. Por que a liberdade, que é tão constitutiva do imaginário e dos discursos prevalecentes no Ocidente, esteve ausente em uma civilização tão sofisticada e longeva como a chinesa? Para responder essa questão, procuramos expor neste trabalho as características prevalecentes da normatividade da China imperial, tentando demonstrar como as suas percepções sobre o homem e o mundo resistem e se distanciam daquilo que no Ocidente se pensou como liberdade.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIRamos, Marcelo Maciel2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/20310.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2015.v1i1.203Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO2526-02512526-0251reponame:Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídicainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203/205Direitos autorais 2016 Marcelo Maciel Ramoshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-20T01:29:39Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/203Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/ONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br2526-02512526-0251opendoar:2021-08-20T01:29:39Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY? POR QUE A CHINA IMPERIAL NÃO PENSOU A LIBERDADE? NOTAS SOBRE AS PECULIARIDADES DA TRADIÇÃO NORMATIVA CHINESA |
title |
WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY? |
spellingShingle |
WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY? Ramos, Marcelo Maciel Imperial china, Chinese normativity, Confucianism, Liberty China imperial, Normatividade chinesa, Confucionismo, Liberdade |
title_short |
WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY? |
title_full |
WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY? |
title_fullStr |
WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY? |
title_full_unstemmed |
WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY? |
title_sort |
WHY IMPERIAL CHINA HASNT CONSIDERED THE IDEA OF LIBERTY? |
author |
Ramos, Marcelo Maciel |
author_facet |
Ramos, Marcelo Maciel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ramos, Marcelo Maciel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Imperial china, Chinese normativity, Confucianism, Liberty China imperial, Normatividade chinesa, Confucionismo, Liberdade |
topic |
Imperial china, Chinese normativity, Confucianism, Liberty China imperial, Normatividade chinesa, Confucionismo, Liberdade |
description |
This paper proposes a study on the normative tradition of imperial China in the context of its perceptions on mankind and nature. Its linguistic, intellectual and ethical peculiarities are taken into consideration in order to explain the reasons why liberty hasnt been a concern in classical Chinese culture. The notion is not only absent from the debates of the great Chinese thinkers, but also one cannot find in classical Chinese an ideogram that matches the idea. Why liberty, which is so constitutive of the imaginary and the prevailing discourses in the Western cultures, were absent in a civilization as sophisticated as the Chinese? In order to answer that question, we sought to expose the prevailing characteristics of imperial Chinas normativity, trying to demonstrate how its perceptions on mankind and nature tend to resist and to distance themselves from what, in the Western civilization, was thought as liberty. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-06 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2015.v1i1.203 |
url |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2015.v1i1.203 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/203/205 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Marcelo Maciel Ramos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Direitos autorais 2016 Marcelo Maciel Ramos http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO 2526-0251 2526-0251 reponame:Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica |
collection |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br |
_version_ |
1798314867869876224 |