The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of Law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Alban, Carlos Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Maia, Selmar José
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/1508
Resumo: This article aims to review the concepts present in the article of Niklas Luhmann called "the return of the twelfth camel", including that of autopoietic social systems and the confront of the paradoxes. The method adopted is the pragmatic-systemic, which marks the author's view. Based on a literature survey, it reconstructs luhmannian theoretical matrices leading to his rupture with the traditional sociological thought. From the analysis of Luhmann’s work, it is concluded that the Systemic Theory is appropriate to deal with the demands of a polycontextural society in which there are complex irritations in a large and diverse communication web.
id CONPEDI-24_f727f1e12b0d7656238c132418587614
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1508
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-24
network_name_str Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
repository_id_str
spelling The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of LawA Restituição do Décimo Segundo Camelo: Do Direito à Sociologia Jurídicasystem; Luhmann; paradox; autopoiesissistema; Luhmann, paradoxo; autopoieseThis article aims to review the concepts present in the article of Niklas Luhmann called "the return of the twelfth camel", including that of autopoietic social systems and the confront of the paradoxes. The method adopted is the pragmatic-systemic, which marks the author's view. Based on a literature survey, it reconstructs luhmannian theoretical matrices leading to his rupture with the traditional sociological thought. From the analysis of Luhmann’s work, it is concluded that the Systemic Theory is appropriate to deal with the demands of a polycontextural society in which there are complex irritations in a large and diverse communication web.O artigo propõe uma releitura dos conceitos de Niklas Luhmann partindo da obra “A restituição do décimo segundo camelo”, entre eles o dos sistemas sociais autopoéticos e o enfrentamento dos paradoxos. O principal método adotado é o pragmático-sistêmico, que marca a visão do autor. Com base em uma pesquisa bibliográfica, reconstroem-se as matrizes teóricas luhmannianas que levam à ruptura com o pensamento sociológico tradicional. Conforme a análise da obra do autor, conclui-se que a Teoria Sistêmica é apta a lidar com as demandas de uma sociedade policontextural, que conta com irritações complexas em uma grande e diversificada malha de comunicação.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIAlban, Carlos EduardoMaia, Selmar José2016-12-03info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/150810.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2016.v2i2.1508Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica; v. 2, n. 2 (2016): JULHO/DEZEMBRO; 2027 - 10432526-02512526-0251reponame:Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídicainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/1508/pdfDireitos autorais 2017 Carlos Eduardo Alban, Selmar José Maiahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-08-30T15:25:24Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/1508Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/ONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br2526-02512526-0251opendoar:2021-08-30T15:25:24Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of Law
A Restituição do Décimo Segundo Camelo: Do Direito à Sociologia Jurídica
title The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of Law
spellingShingle The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of Law
Alban, Carlos Eduardo
system; Luhmann; paradox; autopoiesis
sistema; Luhmann, paradoxo; autopoiese
title_short The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of Law
title_full The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of Law
title_fullStr The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of Law
title_full_unstemmed The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of Law
title_sort The Twelth Camel Restitution: From Law to Sociology of Law
author Alban, Carlos Eduardo
author_facet Alban, Carlos Eduardo
Maia, Selmar José
author_role author
author2 Maia, Selmar José
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Alban, Carlos Eduardo
Maia, Selmar José
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv system; Luhmann; paradox; autopoiesis
sistema; Luhmann, paradoxo; autopoiese
topic system; Luhmann; paradox; autopoiesis
sistema; Luhmann, paradoxo; autopoiese
description This article aims to review the concepts present in the article of Niklas Luhmann called "the return of the twelfth camel", including that of autopoietic social systems and the confront of the paradoxes. The method adopted is the pragmatic-systemic, which marks the author's view. Based on a literature survey, it reconstructs luhmannian theoretical matrices leading to his rupture with the traditional sociological thought. From the analysis of Luhmann’s work, it is concluded that the Systemic Theory is appropriate to deal with the demands of a polycontextural society in which there are complex irritations in a large and diverse communication web.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-03
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/1508
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2016.v2i2.1508
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/1508
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0251/2016.v2i2.1508
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/culturajuridica/article/view/1508/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 Carlos Eduardo Alban, Selmar José Maia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2017 Carlos Eduardo Alban, Selmar José Maia
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica; v. 2, n. 2 (2016): JULHO/DEZEMBRO; 2027 - 1043
2526-0251
2526-0251
reponame:Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
collection Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Sociologia, Antropologia e Cultura Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv publicacao@conpedi.org.br
_version_ 1798314867843661824

Registros relacionados