Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STF

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Medina, Francisco das Chagas Sampaio
Data de Publicação: 2015
Outros Autores: Pinheiro, Paulo Roberto Meyer
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídica
Texto Completo: http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/HermeneuticaJuridica/article/view/793
Resumo: The aim of this study is to examine how the influence of hermeneutical theories, focused on research on the concept of rule of law, has impacted the interpretation and application of the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 by the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court. The decision of the Court with the Binding Precedent 11 of the Supreme Court, leave more explicit their understanding of the widespread use of handcuffs, before he considered in recent times of abuse, in which detainees have been handcuffed and exposed to media flashes . Only permitted in exceptional cases, leaving justified before the dangerousness of the offender or concrete flight risk. The examination of this relationship will be with attention to the paradigm shift in the understanding of what is the proper legal standard, considering the connection between the text offered as the legislative work of the product and the result presented by the right applicator when faced with a concrete case.
id CONPEDI-30_b8402974e4d2126d0207668d65f6b449
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/793
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-30
network_name_str Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídica
repository_id_str
spelling Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STFLimites do Uso de Algemas a Casos Excepcionais pelo Trabalho da Polícia: Um Equilibrio Desestabilizador Apreciado pelo STFHermeneutics; Binding precedent; If concrete; Rights collision; WeightingHermenêutica; Súmula vinculante; Caso concreto; Colisão de direitos; PonderaçãoThe aim of this study is to examine how the influence of hermeneutical theories, focused on research on the concept of rule of law, has impacted the interpretation and application of the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 by the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court. The decision of the Court with the Binding Precedent 11 of the Supreme Court, leave more explicit their understanding of the widespread use of handcuffs, before he considered in recent times of abuse, in which detainees have been handcuffed and exposed to media flashes . Only permitted in exceptional cases, leaving justified before the dangerousness of the offender or concrete flight risk. The examination of this relationship will be with attention to the paradigm shift in the understanding of what is the proper legal standard, considering the connection between the text offered as the legislative work of the product and the result presented by the right applicator when faced with a concrete case.O objetivo do presente estudo é analisar de que modo a influência de teorias hermenêuticas, voltadas à investigação sobre o conceito de norma jurídica, tem causado impactos na interpretação e aplicação da Constituição brasileira de 1988 pelo Poder Judiciário, em especial pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal. A decisão da Corte com a Súmula Vinculante nº 11 do STF, deixar mais explicitada o seu entendimento sobre o uso generalizado de algemas, diante do que considerou nos últimos tempos de uso abusivo, em que pessoas detidas vêm sendo algemadas e expostas, aos flashes da mídia. Somente lícito em casos excepcionais, restando justificado ante a periculosidade do agente ou risco concreto de fuga. O exame dessa relação se dará com atenção à mudança de paradigma na compreensão do que seja a própria norma jurídica, considerando a conexão existente entre o texto oferecido como produto do trabalho do legislador e o resultado apresentado pelo aplicador do direito quando diante de um caso concreto.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDIMedina, Francisco das Chagas SampaioPinheiro, Paulo Roberto Meyer2015-12-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/HermeneuticaJuridica/article/view/79310.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0103/2015.v1i1.793Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídica; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 158-1782526-01032526-0103reponame:Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídicainstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/HermeneuticaJuridica/article/view/793/pdfDireitos autorais 2016 Francisco das Chagas Sampaio Medina, Paulo Roberto Meyer Pinheirohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-18T03:10:38Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/793Revistahttp://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/HermeneuticaJuridica/oai2526-01032526-0103opendoar:2018-02-18T03:10:38Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STF
Limites do Uso de Algemas a Casos Excepcionais pelo Trabalho da Polícia: Um Equilibrio Desestabilizador Apreciado pelo STF
title Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STF
spellingShingle Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STF
Medina, Francisco das Chagas Sampaio
Hermeneutics; Binding precedent; If concrete; Rights collision; Weighting
Hermenêutica; Súmula vinculante; Caso concreto; Colisão de direitos; Ponderação
title_short Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STF
title_full Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STF
title_fullStr Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STF
title_full_unstemmed Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STF
title_sort Limits Handcuffs Use of Exceptional Cases, the Police Work: A Balance Destabilizing Appreciated by STF
author Medina, Francisco das Chagas Sampaio
author_facet Medina, Francisco das Chagas Sampaio
Pinheiro, Paulo Roberto Meyer
author_role author
author2 Pinheiro, Paulo Roberto Meyer
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Medina, Francisco das Chagas Sampaio
Pinheiro, Paulo Roberto Meyer
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hermeneutics; Binding precedent; If concrete; Rights collision; Weighting
Hermenêutica; Súmula vinculante; Caso concreto; Colisão de direitos; Ponderação
topic Hermeneutics; Binding precedent; If concrete; Rights collision; Weighting
Hermenêutica; Súmula vinculante; Caso concreto; Colisão de direitos; Ponderação
description The aim of this study is to examine how the influence of hermeneutical theories, focused on research on the concept of rule of law, has impacted the interpretation and application of the Brazilian Constitution of 1988 by the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court. The decision of the Court with the Binding Precedent 11 of the Supreme Court, leave more explicit their understanding of the widespread use of handcuffs, before he considered in recent times of abuse, in which detainees have been handcuffed and exposed to media flashes . Only permitted in exceptional cases, leaving justified before the dangerousness of the offender or concrete flight risk. The examination of this relationship will be with attention to the paradigm shift in the understanding of what is the proper legal standard, considering the connection between the text offered as the legislative work of the product and the result presented by the right applicator when faced with a concrete case.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-06
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Avaliado pelos Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/HermeneuticaJuridica/article/view/793
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0103/2015.v1i1.793
url http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/HermeneuticaJuridica/article/view/793
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2526-0103/2015.v1i1.793
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/HermeneuticaJuridica/article/view/793/pdf
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Francisco das Chagas Sampaio Medina, Paulo Roberto Meyer Pinheiro
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos autorais 2016 Francisco das Chagas Sampaio Medina, Paulo Roberto Meyer Pinheiro
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídica; v. 1, n. 1 (2015): JANEIRO-DEZEMRBO; 158-178
2526-0103
2526-0103
reponame:Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídica
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídica
collection Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídica
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Argumentação e Hermeneutica Jurídica - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808844453386911744

Registros relacionados