JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cavalcanti, Alessandra Damian
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3018
Resumo: This article evaluates what is judicial activism and what is the role of the Constitutional Court when they are dealing with constitutional omissions. The origin of the term activism in US law and the judicial activism in the United States. Analyze what would be the activism in Brazil and what is the role of the Constitutional Court in our system, is that possible to rank the concretists decisions on writs of injunction as activist decisions or in this case, it was only the work of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) according to its role? There are several different meanings for judicial activism . When the Constitutional Court exercises its judicial function provided in the text of the Constitution, which expressly provides the pertinence of an injunctive writ , this act can not be classified as judicial activism in its negative conception of exacerbation of power.
id CONPEDI-34_940e02923f642efc46aeaa01007ba2f6
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3018
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-34
network_name_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSISATIVISMO JUDICIAL OU CRIAÇÃO JUDICIAL DO DIREITO? O PAPEL DA CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL NAS OMISSÕES CONSTITUCIONAIS - MANDADOS DE INJUNÇÃO nº 670, 708 e 712STF. Judicial Activism. Omission. Role of the Court.Ativismo Judicial; Omissão Constitucional; Mandado de Injunção; Papel da Corte.This article evaluates what is judicial activism and what is the role of the Constitutional Court when they are dealing with constitutional omissions. The origin of the term activism in US law and the judicial activism in the United States. Analyze what would be the activism in Brazil and what is the role of the Constitutional Court in our system, is that possible to rank the concretists decisions on writs of injunction as activist decisions or in this case, it was only the work of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) according to its role? There are several different meanings for judicial activism . When the Constitutional Court exercises its judicial function provided in the text of the Constitution, which expressly provides the pertinence of an injunctive writ , this act can not be classified as judicial activism in its negative conception of exacerbation of power.RESUMO: O presente artigo analisa o que é o ativismo judicial e qual é o papel da Corte Constitucional nas omissões constitucionais. O enfoque do artigo são as decisões proferidas nos Mandados de Injunção nº 670, 708 e 712 que versam sobre o direito de greve dos servidores públicos. Ao analisar o ativismo e qual é o papel da Corte Constitucional no nosso sistema, é possível classificar as decisões proferidas nos mandados de injunção já citados como ativistas ou neste caso trata-se apenas de atuação do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) cumprindo o seu papel? Verifica-se que existem diferentes acepções para o ativismo judicial. Quando a Corte Constitucional exerce sua função jurisdicional prevista no texto da Constituição que prevê expressamente o cabimento do mandado de injunção, esse ato não pode ser classificado como ativismo judicial na concepção negativa de exacerbação de poder.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDICavalcanti, Alessandra Damian2017-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/301810.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.3018Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 16, n. 7 (2017); 79-952358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3018/2777info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-17T01:29:37Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3018Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-17T01:29:37Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
ATIVISMO JUDICIAL OU CRIAÇÃO JUDICIAL DO DIREITO? O PAPEL DA CORTE CONSTITUCIONAL NAS OMISSÕES CONSTITUCIONAIS - MANDADOS DE INJUNÇÃO nº 670, 708 e 712
title JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
spellingShingle JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
Cavalcanti, Alessandra Damian
STF. Judicial Activism. Omission. Role of the Court.
Ativismo Judicial; Omissão Constitucional; Mandado de Injunção; Papel da Corte.
title_short JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_fullStr JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_sort JUDICIAL ACTIVISM OR JUDICIAL CREATION OF LAW? THE ROLE OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT IN THE CONSTITUTIONAL OMISSIONS – A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
author Cavalcanti, Alessandra Damian
author_facet Cavalcanti, Alessandra Damian
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cavalcanti, Alessandra Damian
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv STF. Judicial Activism. Omission. Role of the Court.
Ativismo Judicial; Omissão Constitucional; Mandado de Injunção; Papel da Corte.
topic STF. Judicial Activism. Omission. Role of the Court.
Ativismo Judicial; Omissão Constitucional; Mandado de Injunção; Papel da Corte.
description This article evaluates what is judicial activism and what is the role of the Constitutional Court when they are dealing with constitutional omissions. The origin of the term activism in US law and the judicial activism in the United States. Analyze what would be the activism in Brazil and what is the role of the Constitutional Court in our system, is that possible to rank the concretists decisions on writs of injunction as activist decisions or in this case, it was only the work of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) according to its role? There are several different meanings for judicial activism . When the Constitutional Court exercises its judicial function provided in the text of the Constitution, which expressly provides the pertinence of an injunctive writ , this act can not be classified as judicial activism in its negative conception of exacerbation of power.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-04-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3018
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.3018
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3018
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v16i7.3018
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3018/2777
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 16, n. 7 (2017); 79-95
2358-1352
2237-583X
reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistardb@gmail.com
_version_ 1803388908739756032

Registros relacionados