By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of Injunction

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fulgêncio, Henrique Augusto Figueiredo
Data de Publicação: 2018
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências Sociais
Texto Completo: http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/30939
Resumo: This article analyzes the role played by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court members in the Writ of Injunction´s creating and recasting process. Based on the analysis of the opinions informally issued by the justices to the press during the constituent process of 1987-1988, as well as the leading cases on Writ of Injunction, it holds that the abovementioned justices were key political actors in the Writ of Injunction’s neutralizing process. For this purpose they adopted 3 successive strategies: to influence the Constituent Assembly´s members to restrain said institute; to delay the Writ of Injunction’s enforcement until its legal regulation takes place; and to restrict its effects through creative interpretation. Through these strategies, the political dispute over the Writ of Injunction was extended to the judicial scope, which remains in dialogue with the legislative sphere under the leadership of the Supreme Court members.
id UFC-6_584208008c648ded599959bde91bce6f
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/30939
network_acronym_str UFC-6
network_name_str Revista de Ciências Sociais
repository_id_str
spelling By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of InjunctionPor outros meios: as decisões judiciais como continuidade da política na jurisprudência do Supremo sobre o Mandado de InjunçãoWrit of InjunctionBrazilian Federal Supreme CourtUnconstitutionality By OmissionPolitical ActingJudicial CreativityMandado de InjunçãoSupremo Tribunal Federalinconstitucionalidade por omissãoatuação políticacriatividade judicial.This article analyzes the role played by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court members in the Writ of Injunction´s creating and recasting process. Based on the analysis of the opinions informally issued by the justices to the press during the constituent process of 1987-1988, as well as the leading cases on Writ of Injunction, it holds that the abovementioned justices were key political actors in the Writ of Injunction’s neutralizing process. For this purpose they adopted 3 successive strategies: to influence the Constituent Assembly´s members to restrain said institute; to delay the Writ of Injunction’s enforcement until its legal regulation takes place; and to restrict its effects through creative interpretation. Through these strategies, the political dispute over the Writ of Injunction was extended to the judicial scope, which remains in dialogue with the legislative sphere under the leadership of the Supreme Court members.O presente artigo examina o papel dos membros do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) no processo de criação e reformulação do Mandado de Injunção (MI). A partir de análise das opiniões informais emitidas pelos ministros perante a imprensa durante o processo constituinte de 1987-1988, bem como dos leading cases sobre o MI, sustenta-se que referidos magistrados foram atores políticos essenciais ao processo de neutralização das potencialidades do instituto. Utilizaram-se, para tanto, de 3 estratégias sucessivas: influenciar os membros da Constituinte a providenciar sua limitação; protelar a aplicação do MI até que sobreviesse sua regulamentação legal; e restringir seus efeitos mediante interpretação criativa. Por meio dessas estratégias, a disputa política em torno do MI foi prorrogada para o âmbito judicial, que permanece em diálogo com a esfera legislativa sob a condução dos membros do STF.Universidade Federal do Ceará2018-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/30939Revista de Ciências Sociais (Social Sciences' Journal); Vol. 49 No. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 181-243Revista de Ciências Sociais (Revista de Ciencias Sociales); Vol. 49 Núm. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 181-243Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 49 n. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 181-2432318-46200041-8862reponame:Revista de Ciências Sociaisinstname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCporhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/30939/73058Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Sociaisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFulgêncio, Henrique Augusto Figueiredo2019-01-15T20:32:39Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/30939Revistahttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revciensoPUBhttp://www.periodicos.ufc.br/index.php/revcienso/oai||rcs.ufc@gmail.com|| cunhafilho@ufc.br2318-46200041-8862opendoar:2019-01-15T20:32:39Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of Injunction
Por outros meios: as decisões judiciais como continuidade da política na jurisprudência do Supremo sobre o Mandado de Injunção
title By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of Injunction
spellingShingle By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of Injunction
Fulgêncio, Henrique Augusto Figueiredo
Writ of Injunction
Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
Unconstitutionality By Omission
Political Acting
Judicial Creativity
Mandado de Injunção
Supremo Tribunal Federal
inconstitucionalidade por omissão
atuação política
criatividade judicial.
title_short By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of Injunction
title_full By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of Injunction
title_fullStr By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of Injunction
title_full_unstemmed By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of Injunction
title_sort By other means: judicial decisions as a continuation of the politics in the jurisprudence of the Supreme on the Writ of Injunction
author Fulgêncio, Henrique Augusto Figueiredo
author_facet Fulgêncio, Henrique Augusto Figueiredo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fulgêncio, Henrique Augusto Figueiredo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Writ of Injunction
Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
Unconstitutionality By Omission
Political Acting
Judicial Creativity
Mandado de Injunção
Supremo Tribunal Federal
inconstitucionalidade por omissão
atuação política
criatividade judicial.
topic Writ of Injunction
Brazilian Federal Supreme Court
Unconstitutionality By Omission
Political Acting
Judicial Creativity
Mandado de Injunção
Supremo Tribunal Federal
inconstitucionalidade por omissão
atuação política
criatividade judicial.
description This article analyzes the role played by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court members in the Writ of Injunction´s creating and recasting process. Based on the analysis of the opinions informally issued by the justices to the press during the constituent process of 1987-1988, as well as the leading cases on Writ of Injunction, it holds that the abovementioned justices were key political actors in the Writ of Injunction’s neutralizing process. For this purpose they adopted 3 successive strategies: to influence the Constituent Assembly´s members to restrain said institute; to delay the Writ of Injunction’s enforcement until its legal regulation takes place; and to restrict its effects through creative interpretation. Through these strategies, the political dispute over the Writ of Injunction was extended to the judicial scope, which remains in dialogue with the legislative sphere under the leadership of the Supreme Court members.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/30939
url http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/30939
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/revcienso/article/view/30939/73058
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Sociais
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Revista de Ciências Sociais
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Ceará
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Sociais (Social Sciences' Journal); Vol. 49 No. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 181-243
Revista de Ciências Sociais (Revista de Ciencias Sociales); Vol. 49 Núm. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 181-243
Revista de Ciências Sociais; v. 49 n. 2_Jul/Out (2018): STF, Poder Judiciário e Política; 181-243
2318-4620
0041-8862
reponame:Revista de Ciências Sociais
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista de Ciências Sociais
collection Revista de Ciências Sociais
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Sociais - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rcs.ufc@gmail.com|| cunhafilho@ufc.br
_version_ 1799698947453747200

Registros relacionados