The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rights
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2760 |
Resumo: | Considering Contemporary Constitutional Theory of the applicability of constitutional standards, this article analyzes the effectiveness of the standard which regulates additional compensation for hardship as a fundamental right of workers. Inserted in classical constitutional theory and the applicability of constitutional norms in program standards, labor law which is analyzed here was not regulated by the Legislature, causing substantial damage to workers who exercise their activities subject to severe deterioration in their mental health. Faced with this legislative omission , the approach of the judiciary is of the utmost importance, in the sense of making the right to health of the worker, having in mind the principle of protection and do not allow, in the post-positivism , the negation of the normative legal principles. It is concluded that the solution of a case which involves meeting the principles and tasks extremely difficult, but necessary for the execution of justice, in accordance with the paradigm of the Democratic State of Law, led for realizing rights fundamentals, does not admit that the inertia of the Legislature is as an obstacle to the enforcement of such rights. |
id |
CONPEDI-34_95367d00742a8cc365407b8b21c097eb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2760 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-34 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rightsO adicional de penosidade sob a óptica da Teoria Constitucional Contemporânea: a efetivação dos direitos fundamentaisHardship. Constitutional Standards. Fundamental Rights. Principle of Effectiveness Protection.Considering Contemporary Constitutional Theory of the applicability of constitutional standards, this article analyzes the effectiveness of the standard which regulates additional compensation for hardship as a fundamental right of workers. Inserted in classical constitutional theory and the applicability of constitutional norms in program standards, labor law which is analyzed here was not regulated by the Legislature, causing substantial damage to workers who exercise their activities subject to severe deterioration in their mental health. Faced with this legislative omission , the approach of the judiciary is of the utmost importance, in the sense of making the right to health of the worker, having in mind the principle of protection and do not allow, in the post-positivism , the negation of the normative legal principles. It is concluded that the solution of a case which involves meeting the principles and tasks extremely difficult, but necessary for the execution of justice, in accordance with the paradigm of the Democratic State of Law, led for realizing rights fundamentals, does not admit that the inertia of the Legislature is as an obstacle to the enforcement of such rights.Considerando-se a Teoria Constitucional Contemporânea de aplicabilidade das normas constitucionais, este artigo analisa a efetivação da norma que dispõe sobre o recebimento do adicional de penosidade como direito fundamental dos trabalhadores. Inserida na teoria constitucional clássica de aplicabilidade das normas constitucionais dentre as normas programáticas, o direito social que ora se analisa não foi regulado pelo Legislativo, o que acarreta incontáveis prejuízos aos trabalhadores que exercem suas atividades sujeitos a intenso desgaste da saúde mental. Diante da omissão legislativa, apresenta-se de extrema relevância a atuação do Judiciário no sentido de efetivar o direito à saúde do trabalhador, tendo em vista o princípio da proteção, não se admitindo, no Pós-Positivismo, a negação à normatividade dos princípios jurídicos. Concluir-se-á que a solução de um caso que envolva a colisão de princípios é tarefa extremamente delicada, mas, necessária à realização da justiça, em conformidade com o paradigma do Estado Democrático de Direito, pautado pela concretização dos direitos fundamentais, não se admitindo que a inércia do Legislativo se apresente como óbice à realização de tais direitos.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDILobo, Bárbara Natália Lages2015-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/276010.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2015.v11i5.2760Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 11, n. 5 (2015); 278-3022358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2760/2645info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-02-17T01:33:02Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/2760Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-02-17T01:33:02Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rights O adicional de penosidade sob a óptica da Teoria Constitucional Contemporânea: a efetivação dos direitos fundamentais |
title |
The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rights |
spellingShingle |
The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rights Lobo, Bárbara Natália Lages Hardship. Constitutional Standards. Fundamental Rights. Principle of Effectiveness Protection. |
title_short |
The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rights |
title_full |
The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rights |
title_fullStr |
The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rights |
title_full_unstemmed |
The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rights |
title_sort |
The salary accretion for suffering under optical theory of constitutional contemporary: the effective of fundamental rights |
author |
Lobo, Bárbara Natália Lages |
author_facet |
Lobo, Bárbara Natália Lages |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lobo, Bárbara Natália Lages |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Hardship. Constitutional Standards. Fundamental Rights. Principle of Effectiveness Protection. |
topic |
Hardship. Constitutional Standards. Fundamental Rights. Principle of Effectiveness Protection. |
description |
Considering Contemporary Constitutional Theory of the applicability of constitutional standards, this article analyzes the effectiveness of the standard which regulates additional compensation for hardship as a fundamental right of workers. Inserted in classical constitutional theory and the applicability of constitutional norms in program standards, labor law which is analyzed here was not regulated by the Legislature, causing substantial damage to workers who exercise their activities subject to severe deterioration in their mental health. Faced with this legislative omission , the approach of the judiciary is of the utmost importance, in the sense of making the right to health of the worker, having in mind the principle of protection and do not allow, in the post-positivism , the negation of the normative legal principles. It is concluded that the solution of a case which involves meeting the principles and tasks extremely difficult, but necessary for the execution of justice, in accordance with the paradigm of the Democratic State of Law, led for realizing rights fundamentals, does not admit that the inertia of the Legislature is as an obstacle to the enforcement of such rights. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-08-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2760 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2015.v11i5.2760 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2760 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2015.v11i5.2760 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/2760/2645 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 11, n. 5 (2015); 278-302 2358-1352 2237-583X reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistardb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803388910092419072 |