A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Nottingham, Andréa De Boni
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Santiago, Nestor Eduardo Araruna, Dias, Eduardo Rocha
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3068
Resumo: The constitutionality of the article 28 of the Drugs Enforcement Act is under discussion in the Supreme Court. This is not the first time the same article is analyzed by the Court. In previous trials, the application of the principle of insignificance upon this crime, as well as the Law n. 11.343, of August 23, 2006, were questioned as ways of decriminalizing drug possession for personal consumption behavior. The objective of this article is to analyze the reasons adopted by the Supreme Court in order to decide how to interpret the article 28 of the Drugs Enforcement Act, considering contemporary constitutional hermeneutics. It will also attempt to determine which would be the most appropriate decision in terms of integrity and consistency, for the preservation of the rule of law. For that end, the paper follows a bibliographic and documentary research are used. As for the objectives is explanatory, because the purpose is to verify the arguments that base the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court on the subject and, based on that, to draw a possible conclusion about a future decision, emphasizing the importance of this being consistent with the dictates of the Democratic State of Law.
id CONPEDI-34_edbf16b05d207428ad002119b74b99a8
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3068
network_acronym_str CONPEDI-34
network_name_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACTUMA ANÁLISE HERMENÊUTICO-GARANTISTA DAS RAZÕES DE DECIDIR DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL NA APLICAÇÃO DO ART. 28 DA LEI DE DROGASSupreme Court. Constitutional hermeneutics. Guaranteeism. Drugs Enforcement Act.Poder Judiciário; Justiça Constitucional; Hermenêutica ConstitucionalThe constitutionality of the article 28 of the Drugs Enforcement Act is under discussion in the Supreme Court. This is not the first time the same article is analyzed by the Court. In previous trials, the application of the principle of insignificance upon this crime, as well as the Law n. 11.343, of August 23, 2006, were questioned as ways of decriminalizing drug possession for personal consumption behavior. The objective of this article is to analyze the reasons adopted by the Supreme Court in order to decide how to interpret the article 28 of the Drugs Enforcement Act, considering contemporary constitutional hermeneutics. It will also attempt to determine which would be the most appropriate decision in terms of integrity and consistency, for the preservation of the rule of law. For that end, the paper follows a bibliographic and documentary research are used. As for the objectives is explanatory, because the purpose is to verify the arguments that base the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court on the subject and, based on that, to draw a possible conclusion about a future decision, emphasizing the importance of this being consistent with the dictates of the Democratic State of Law.Encontra-se em discussão, no Supremo Tribunal Federal, a constitucionalidade do art. 28 da Lei de Drogas, sob alegação, da Defensoria Pública do Estado de São Paulo, de que este dispositivo viola direitos fundamentais à privacidade e à intimidade. Entretanto, essa não é a primeira vez que referido artigo é objeto de análise naquela Corte. Em julgamentos anteriores já se questionou acerca da incidência do princípio da insignificância no crime em questão, bem como já se discutiu se a Lei n. 11.343, de 23 de agosto de 2006, ao substituir a pena de prisão por restritivas de direitos, teria despenalizado ou descriminalizado a conduta de porte de drogas para consumo próprio. Assim, o objetivo do presente artigo consiste em analisar as razões de decidir do Supremo Tribunal Federal na aplicação do art. 28 da Lei de Drogas, considerando a hermenêutica constitucional contemporânea, a fim de aferir se há uma previsibilidade para o julgamento final sobre a inconstitucionalidade do dispositivo e, não só isso, analisar qual seria a decisão mais adequada, em termos de integridade e coerência, ao Estado de Direito. Para tanto, metodologicamente, utiliza-se de pesquisa bibliográfica e documental, baseada em estudos de artigos de periódicos e livros de doutrina, bem como no exame do dispositivo legal e de algumas decisões do STF a respeito do tema. Quanto à abordagem, a pesquisa é qualitativa, pois parte de uma reflexão sobre comportamentos humanos e sociais. Tudo para ao final concluir que é necessária uma decisão de cunho garantista condizente com a realidade.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDINottingham, Andréa De BoniSantiago, Nestor Eduardo ArarunaDias, Eduardo Rocha2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/306810.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v18i7.3068Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 18, n. 7 (2017); 191-2132358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3068/2797info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-03-29T21:38:13Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3068Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-03-29T21:38:13Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT
UMA ANÁLISE HERMENÊUTICO-GARANTISTA DAS RAZÕES DE DECIDIR DO SUPREMO TRIBUNAL FEDERAL NA APLICAÇÃO DO ART. 28 DA LEI DE DROGAS
title A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT
spellingShingle A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT
Nottingham, Andréa De Boni
Supreme Court. Constitutional hermeneutics. Guaranteeism. Drugs Enforcement Act.
Poder Judiciário; Justiça Constitucional; Hermenêutica Constitucional
title_short A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT
title_full A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT
title_fullStr A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT
title_full_unstemmed A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT
title_sort A HERMENEUTICAL-GUARANTEEIST ANALYSIS OF THE RATIO DECIDENDI IN BRAZIL´S SUPREME COURT DECISION ABOUT THE APPLICATION OF ART. 28 OF THE DRUG ENFORCEMENT ACT
author Nottingham, Andréa De Boni
author_facet Nottingham, Andréa De Boni
Santiago, Nestor Eduardo Araruna
Dias, Eduardo Rocha
author_role author
author2 Santiago, Nestor Eduardo Araruna
Dias, Eduardo Rocha
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Nottingham, Andréa De Boni
Santiago, Nestor Eduardo Araruna
Dias, Eduardo Rocha
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Supreme Court. Constitutional hermeneutics. Guaranteeism. Drugs Enforcement Act.
Poder Judiciário; Justiça Constitucional; Hermenêutica Constitucional
topic Supreme Court. Constitutional hermeneutics. Guaranteeism. Drugs Enforcement Act.
Poder Judiciário; Justiça Constitucional; Hermenêutica Constitucional
description The constitutionality of the article 28 of the Drugs Enforcement Act is under discussion in the Supreme Court. This is not the first time the same article is analyzed by the Court. In previous trials, the application of the principle of insignificance upon this crime, as well as the Law n. 11.343, of August 23, 2006, were questioned as ways of decriminalizing drug possession for personal consumption behavior. The objective of this article is to analyze the reasons adopted by the Supreme Court in order to decide how to interpret the article 28 of the Drugs Enforcement Act, considering contemporary constitutional hermeneutics. It will also attempt to determine which would be the most appropriate decision in terms of integrity and consistency, for the preservation of the rule of law. For that end, the paper follows a bibliographic and documentary research are used. As for the objectives is explanatory, because the purpose is to verify the arguments that base the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court on the subject and, based on that, to draw a possible conclusion about a future decision, emphasizing the importance of this being consistent with the dictates of the Democratic State of Law.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-01
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3068
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v18i7.3068
url https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3068
identifier_str_mv 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v18i7.3068
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3068/2797
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 18, n. 7 (2017); 191-213
2358-1352
2237-583X
reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron:CONPEDI
instname_str Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
instacron_str CONPEDI
institution CONPEDI
reponame_str Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
collection Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistardb@gmail.com
_version_ 1803388906227367936

Registros relacionados