SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGM
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3112 |
Resumo: | There is not yet a theory about the systematization of precedents, and the normative system model conceived by positivism for the legal order is used in an unthinking way, which results in the pyramidal and hierarchical structure of unidirectional relations. It is a foundationalist model. Thus, precedents are reduced to norms and staggered according to the degree of the enacting court, and their incompatibilities are treated as antinomies. Notwithstanding, such a model does not fit the precedents, which cannot be reduced to norms, since they are a hermeneutical gain, having variable binding force. Consequently, inconsistencies are not antinomies. It requires a coherentist system model based on substantial relations of dialectical logic, which structure the whole in a network of mutual multidirectional interactions, and its eventual inconsistencies are solved by measuring the hermeneutic force. This paper intends to demonstrate the inadequacy of the foundationalist model by proposing a complex legal system formed by two subsystems: a normative – composed by constitutional, legal and regulatory norms, whose structure tries to be pyramidal - , and another one of precedents - structured in a network, and formed by the decisions of the multiple courts that has generated a hermeneutical gain for the legal system as a whole. |
id |
CONPEDI-34_f3264e3687ac3cf43ebcd424a3577bb2 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3112 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-34 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGMSISTEMATIZAÇÃO DE PRECEDENTES E ORDENAMENTO JURÍDICO: PROPOSTA DE UM PARADIGMA TEÓRICOSystematization of precedents. Legal system. Integrity.Precedentes. Sistema. Ordenamento jurídico. Integridade.There is not yet a theory about the systematization of precedents, and the normative system model conceived by positivism for the legal order is used in an unthinking way, which results in the pyramidal and hierarchical structure of unidirectional relations. It is a foundationalist model. Thus, precedents are reduced to norms and staggered according to the degree of the enacting court, and their incompatibilities are treated as antinomies. Notwithstanding, such a model does not fit the precedents, which cannot be reduced to norms, since they are a hermeneutical gain, having variable binding force. Consequently, inconsistencies are not antinomies. It requires a coherentist system model based on substantial relations of dialectical logic, which structure the whole in a network of mutual multidirectional interactions, and its eventual inconsistencies are solved by measuring the hermeneutic force. This paper intends to demonstrate the inadequacy of the foundationalist model by proposing a complex legal system formed by two subsystems: a normative – composed by constitutional, legal and regulatory norms, whose structure tries to be pyramidal - , and another one of precedents - structured in a network, and formed by the decisions of the multiple courts that has generated a hermeneutical gain for the legal system as a whole.Não existe ainda uma específica teoria sobre a sistematização dos precedentes, sendo utilizado irrefletidamente o modelo de sistema normativo clássico concebido pelo positivismo para explicar o ordenamento jurídico, segundo uma lógica formal que resulta em estrutura piramidal e hierarquizada de relações unidirecionais. Tem-se um padrão fundacionalista. Assim, os precedentes são reduzidos a normas e escalonados pelo grau da corte emissora, presumindo-se que possuem vigência, promulgação e revogação, sendo suas incompatibilidades tratadas como antinomias normativas. Contudo, tal modelo não se ajusta aos precedentes, que não podem ser reduzidos a normas, pois são um ganho hermenêutica que possui força vinculante variável. Consequentemente, as incoerências não são antinomias, não podendo ser solucionadas como tais. Exige-se, então, um modelo coerentista de sistema pautado em relações substanciais de lógica dialética, que estruturam o conjunto em uma rede de mútuas relações multidirecionais, sendo eventuais incoerências solucionadas por mensuração da força hermenêutica de cada julgado. O presente artigo pretende, mediante revisão bibliográfica e análise jurisprudencial, demonstrar a inadequação do padrão fundacionalista, concluindo pela necessidade de elaboração de um padrão coerentista para trato dos precedentes mais bem adequada às exigências atuais do Direito. Esse modelo evidencia que sistema jurídico é um sistema complexo, formado por dois subsistemas: um normativo – formado por normas constitucionais, legais e regulamentares, cuja estruturação tenta ser piramidal -, e outro de precedentes – estruturado em rede, e formado pelos julgados das várias cortes que tenha gerado um ganho hermenêutico para o sistema jurídico como um todo.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDILopes Filho, Juraci Mourão2017-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/311210.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v18i7.3112Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 18, n. 7 (2017); 149-1722358-13522237-583Xreponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online)instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3112/2824info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-03-29T21:38:13Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3112Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/PRIhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/oairevistardb@gmail.com2358-13522237-583Xopendoar:2018-03-29T21:38:13Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGM SISTEMATIZAÇÃO DE PRECEDENTES E ORDENAMENTO JURÍDICO: PROPOSTA DE UM PARADIGMA TEÓRICO |
title |
SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGM |
spellingShingle |
SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGM Lopes Filho, Juraci Mourão Systematization of precedents. Legal system. Integrity. Precedentes. Sistema. Ordenamento jurídico. Integridade. |
title_short |
SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGM |
title_full |
SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGM |
title_fullStr |
SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGM |
title_full_unstemmed |
SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGM |
title_sort |
SYSTEMATIZATION OF PRECEDENTS AND LEGAL SYSTEM: PROPOSAL OF A THEORETICAL PARADIGM |
author |
Lopes Filho, Juraci Mourão |
author_facet |
Lopes Filho, Juraci Mourão |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lopes Filho, Juraci Mourão |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Systematization of precedents. Legal system. Integrity. Precedentes. Sistema. Ordenamento jurídico. Integridade. |
topic |
Systematization of precedents. Legal system. Integrity. Precedentes. Sistema. Ordenamento jurídico. Integridade. |
description |
There is not yet a theory about the systematization of precedents, and the normative system model conceived by positivism for the legal order is used in an unthinking way, which results in the pyramidal and hierarchical structure of unidirectional relations. It is a foundationalist model. Thus, precedents are reduced to norms and staggered according to the degree of the enacting court, and their incompatibilities are treated as antinomies. Notwithstanding, such a model does not fit the precedents, which cannot be reduced to norms, since they are a hermeneutical gain, having variable binding force. Consequently, inconsistencies are not antinomies. It requires a coherentist system model based on substantial relations of dialectical logic, which structure the whole in a network of mutual multidirectional interactions, and its eventual inconsistencies are solved by measuring the hermeneutic force. This paper intends to demonstrate the inadequacy of the foundationalist model by proposing a complex legal system formed by two subsystems: a normative – composed by constitutional, legal and regulatory norms, whose structure tries to be pyramidal - , and another one of precedents - structured in a network, and formed by the decisions of the multiple courts that has generated a hermeneutical gain for the legal system as a whole. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-12-01 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3112 10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v18i7.3112 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3112 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/IndexLawJournals/2358-1352/2017.v18i7.3112 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/rdb/article/view/3112/2824 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira; v. 18, n. 7 (2017); 149-172 2358-1352 2237-583X reponame:Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Direito Brasileira (Online) - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistardb@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1803388908755484672 |