Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System Improvement
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Conpedi Law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3354 |
Resumo: | Corruption is one of the serious Brazilian problems. The embezzlement of public funds prevents the realization of fundamental social rights and delays national develop- ment prevent inhibiting the real access to citizenship. Brazil needs to face the paradox of being the eighth world’s largest economy, and having low human development indexes. Social justice does not coexist with impunity. Public funds, paid by taxpayers, sidetracked by corruption schemes, fail to reach the investments in the enlargement of public health, education, security and infrastructure. Moreover, the opportunity of corruption increases corruption when there is impunity. To reduce corruption levels in Brazil, it is urgent to think about legal system improvement alternatives, a task which is also entrusted to the academy. Although positive law does not change social reality, the lack of appropriate legal mechanisms prevents the equating of part of the Brazilian’s society problems, such as corruption. In the extrapenal sphere, beginning with constitutional law, it is important to emphasize the need to improve issues such as the strengthening of internal and external controls, reforming constitutional institutions, such as the Courts of Auditors. In addi- tion, the enlargement of transparency and social control of the prosecution performance in infra constitutional sphere requires fundamental legislative reforms, in order to provide for the realization of the human rights enshrined in the 1988 Constitution. |
id |
CONPEDI-4_ed997c28fe8f08c49a781c5e0e0cac3d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3354 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-4 |
network_name_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System ImprovementCidadania e o Combate à Corrupção: Propostas Extrapenais de Aperfeiçoamento do Ordenamento Jurídico BrasileiroKey words CorruptionAlternatives to improve the brazilian legal systemCitizenship.CorrupçãoPropostas de aperfeiçoamento do ordenamento jurídico brasileiroCidadania.Corruption is one of the serious Brazilian problems. The embezzlement of public funds prevents the realization of fundamental social rights and delays national develop- ment prevent inhibiting the real access to citizenship. Brazil needs to face the paradox of being the eighth world’s largest economy, and having low human development indexes. Social justice does not coexist with impunity. Public funds, paid by taxpayers, sidetracked by corruption schemes, fail to reach the investments in the enlargement of public health, education, security and infrastructure. Moreover, the opportunity of corruption increases corruption when there is impunity. To reduce corruption levels in Brazil, it is urgent to think about legal system improvement alternatives, a task which is also entrusted to the academy. Although positive law does not change social reality, the lack of appropriate legal mechanisms prevents the equating of part of the Brazilian’s society problems, such as corruption. In the extrapenal sphere, beginning with constitutional law, it is important to emphasize the need to improve issues such as the strengthening of internal and external controls, reforming constitutional institutions, such as the Courts of Auditors. In addi- tion, the enlargement of transparency and social control of the prosecution performance in infra constitutional sphere requires fundamental legislative reforms, in order to provide for the realization of the human rights enshrined in the 1988 Constitution.A corrupção é um dos graves problemas brasileiros. O desvio de recursos públicos impede a efetivação de direitos fundamentais sociais e atrasa o desenvolvimento nacional obstando o real acesso à cidadania. O Brasil precisa enfrentar o paradoxo de ser a oitiva maior economia do mundo, mas ainda possuir baixos índices de desenvolvimento humano. Justiça social não convive com impunidade. São os recursos públicos, pagos pelos contribuintes, que, desviados pelos esquemas de corrupção, faltam para a ampliação dos investimentos em saúde, educação, segurança e infraestrutura. Além disso, a oportunidade da corrupção se transforma em mais corrupção, quando há impunidade. Para diminuir os índices de corrupção no Brasil, é urgente pensar em alternativas de aperfeiçoamento do sistema jurídico, tarefa que também incumbe à academia. Embora o direito positivo não altere a realidade social, a inexistência de mecanismos jurídicos apropriados obsta o equacionamento de parcela dos problemas da sociedade brasileira, como é o caso da corrupção. Na esfera extrapenal, começando pelo Direito Constitucional, é importante ressaltar a necessidade de aperfeiçoamento de questões como a do fortalecimento dos controles interno e externo, reformando instituições constitucionais, como é o caso dos Tribunais de Contas. Além disso, a ampliação da transparência e do controle social e o aperfeiçoamento da atuação do Ministério Público no plano infraconstitucional demandam reformas legislativas fundamentais, para se viabilizar a efetivação dos Direitos Humanos consagrados na Constituição de 1988.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/335410.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i1.3354Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 223-2442448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3354/2875Copyright (c) 2016 Conpedi Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCambi, Eduardo Augusto SalomãoBertoncini, Mateus Eduardo Siqueira Nunes2021-08-20T02:10:34Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3354Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:10:34Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System Improvement Cidadania e o Combate à Corrupção: Propostas Extrapenais de Aperfeiçoamento do Ordenamento Jurídico Brasileiro |
title |
Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System Improvement |
spellingShingle |
Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System Improvement Cambi, Eduardo Augusto Salomão Key words Corruption Alternatives to improve the brazilian legal system Citizenship. Corrupção Propostas de aperfeiçoamento do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro Cidadania. |
title_short |
Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System Improvement |
title_full |
Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System Improvement |
title_fullStr |
Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System Improvement |
title_full_unstemmed |
Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System Improvement |
title_sort |
Citizenship and Combating Corruption Proposals Extrapenais of Brazilian Legal System Improvement |
author |
Cambi, Eduardo Augusto Salomão |
author_facet |
Cambi, Eduardo Augusto Salomão Bertoncini, Mateus Eduardo Siqueira Nunes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bertoncini, Mateus Eduardo Siqueira Nunes |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cambi, Eduardo Augusto Salomão Bertoncini, Mateus Eduardo Siqueira Nunes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Key words Corruption Alternatives to improve the brazilian legal system Citizenship. Corrupção Propostas de aperfeiçoamento do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro Cidadania. |
topic |
Key words Corruption Alternatives to improve the brazilian legal system Citizenship. Corrupção Propostas de aperfeiçoamento do ordenamento jurídico brasileiro Cidadania. |
description |
Corruption is one of the serious Brazilian problems. The embezzlement of public funds prevents the realization of fundamental social rights and delays national develop- ment prevent inhibiting the real access to citizenship. Brazil needs to face the paradox of being the eighth world’s largest economy, and having low human development indexes. Social justice does not coexist with impunity. Public funds, paid by taxpayers, sidetracked by corruption schemes, fail to reach the investments in the enlargement of public health, education, security and infrastructure. Moreover, the opportunity of corruption increases corruption when there is impunity. To reduce corruption levels in Brazil, it is urgent to think about legal system improvement alternatives, a task which is also entrusted to the academy. Although positive law does not change social reality, the lack of appropriate legal mechanisms prevents the equating of part of the Brazilian’s society problems, such as corruption. In the extrapenal sphere, beginning with constitutional law, it is important to emphasize the need to improve issues such as the strengthening of internal and external controls, reforming constitutional institutions, such as the Courts of Auditors. In addi- tion, the enlargement of transparency and social control of the prosecution performance in infra constitutional sphere requires fundamental legislative reforms, in order to provide for the realization of the human rights enshrined in the 1988 Constitution. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3354 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i1.3354 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3354 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i1.3354 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3354/2875 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Conpedi Law Review info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Conpedi Law Review |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 223-244 2448-3931 2448-3931 reponame:Conpedi Law Review instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
collection |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1809730144353386496 |