Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Conpedi Law Review |
Texto Completo: | https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3356 |
Resumo: | This article aims to discuss, firstly, and based on the theory of José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho if constitucional rights generate another constitucional right to procedure. The second step is to study which are the mechanisms statued in the Brazilian legislation that may be used to enforcement of Rights that are presented in the Constitution of the Fede- rative Republic of Brazil. Finally, although there is a growing realization of fundamental rights, there is a procedural deficit in Brazilian Law too. Against the government’s inef- fectiveness the society participation in the pursuit of realization of constitutional rights through the provision of legal protection is imperious.The method used for the research and reporting is inductive. |
id |
CONPEDI-4_f53ba4a42643dbcb9c0d11cf333e509f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3356 |
network_acronym_str |
CONPEDI-4 |
network_name_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes CanotilhoConstituição e Deficit Procedimental na Garantia dos Direitos Fundamentais no Brasil: Análise a Partir da Proposta de José Joaquim Gomes CanotilhoProcessProceduresConstitutionConstitutional rights.ProcessoProcedimentosConstituiçãoDireitos fundamentais.This article aims to discuss, firstly, and based on the theory of José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho if constitucional rights generate another constitucional right to procedure. The second step is to study which are the mechanisms statued in the Brazilian legislation that may be used to enforcement of Rights that are presented in the Constitution of the Fede- rative Republic of Brazil. Finally, although there is a growing realization of fundamental rights, there is a procedural deficit in Brazilian Law too. Against the government’s inef- fectiveness the society participation in the pursuit of realization of constitutional rights through the provision of legal protection is imperious.The method used for the research and reporting is inductive.O presente artigo trata de discutir, primeiramente, e com base na teoria de José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho, se os Direitos Fundamentais constitucionalmente previstos geram um direito fundamental ao procedimento de efetivação destes direitos. Em um segundo momento estuda-se quais os mecanismos existentes na legislação brasileira com vistas à efetivação dos Direitos Fundamentais previstos na Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Verifica-se, por fim, que apesar de haver uma crescente efetivação dos Direitos Fundamentais ainda encontra-se um déficit procedimental no Direito Brasileiro. Diante da inoperância do Poder Público é imperiosa a participação da sociedade na busca da concretização dos Direitos Fundamentais através da prestação da tutela jurisdicional. O método a ser utilizado para a pesquisa e relato é o indutivo.Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI2016-05-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo avaliado pelos Paresapplication/pdfhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/335610.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i1.3356Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 260-2742448-39312448-3931reponame:Conpedi Law Reviewinstname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)instacron:CONPEDIporhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3356/2877Copyright (c) 2016 Conpedi Law Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFernandes, Fernanda Sell de Souto GoulartDantas, Marcelo Buzaglo2021-08-20T02:10:35Zoai:ojs.indexlaw.org:article/3356Revistahttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireviewONGhttps://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/oaipublicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com2448-39312448-3931opendoar:2021-08-20T02:10:35Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho Constituição e Deficit Procedimental na Garantia dos Direitos Fundamentais no Brasil: Análise a Partir da Proposta de José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho |
title |
Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho |
spellingShingle |
Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho Fernandes, Fernanda Sell de Souto Goulart Process Procedures Constitution Constitutional rights. Processo Procedimentos Constituição Direitos fundamentais. |
title_short |
Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho |
title_full |
Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho |
title_fullStr |
Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho |
title_sort |
Constitution and Procedural Deficit on Fundamental Rights Guarantee in Brazil : Analysis From The Motion for José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho |
author |
Fernandes, Fernanda Sell de Souto Goulart |
author_facet |
Fernandes, Fernanda Sell de Souto Goulart Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fernandes, Fernanda Sell de Souto Goulart Dantas, Marcelo Buzaglo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Process Procedures Constitution Constitutional rights. Processo Procedimentos Constituição Direitos fundamentais. |
topic |
Process Procedures Constitution Constitutional rights. Processo Procedimentos Constituição Direitos fundamentais. |
description |
This article aims to discuss, firstly, and based on the theory of José Joaquim Gomes Canotilho if constitucional rights generate another constitucional right to procedure. The second step is to study which are the mechanisms statued in the Brazilian legislation that may be used to enforcement of Rights that are presented in the Constitution of the Fede- rative Republic of Brazil. Finally, although there is a growing realization of fundamental rights, there is a procedural deficit in Brazilian Law too. Against the government’s inef- fectiveness the society participation in the pursuit of realization of constitutional rights through the provision of legal protection is imperious.The method used for the research and reporting is inductive. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-05-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artigo avaliado pelos Pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3356 10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i1.3356 |
url |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3356 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.26668/2448-3931_conpedilawreview/2015.v1i1.3356 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.indexlaw.org/index.php/conpedireview/article/view/3356/2877 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Conpedi Law Review info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Conpedi Law Review |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pos-Graduacao em Direito - CONPEDI |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review; v. 1 n. 1 (2015): Direito Constitucional, Direitos Humanos; 260-274 2448-3931 2448-3931 reponame:Conpedi Law Review instname:Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) instacron:CONPEDI |
instname_str |
Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
instacron_str |
CONPEDI |
institution |
CONPEDI |
reponame_str |
Conpedi Law Review |
collection |
Conpedi Law Review |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Conpedi Law Review - Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Direito (CONPEDI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacao@conpedi.org.br||indexlawjournals@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1809730144357580800 |