A efetividade do Ministério Público do Patrimônio: uma análise de sua atuação no 1º e no 2º grau de jurisdição do ano de 2014 ao ano de 2019

• Autor(a) principal: Freitas, Luciane Evelyn Cleto Melluso Teixeira de
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Tipo de documento: Dissertação
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/3987
• topic: Ministério Público; Agenda 2030; Efetividade; Combate à corrupção; Improbidade administrativa; CNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITO

This paper seeks to examine the performance of the Public Prosecutor’s Office in the area of protection to public property and its effectiveness on the first and second jurisdiction level, a circumstance related to efficacious and responsible institutions, as prescribed by the Agenda 2030, considering that the theme is connected to Sustainable Development Goal No. 16. It is proposed that it is incumbent to the body to internalize and disseminate the implementation process of the Agenda in order to achieve the desired efficiency as a responsible institution, aiming at improvements in public management and enhancement of public policies, with more effectiveness of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, which has assignments to promote all civil judicial actions required for the protection of the principles of public management and protection of public property. Purpose of this paper is to analyze activity of the Public Prosecution regarding 196 civil lawsuits contained in PROJUDI – Electronic Process System of the Judiciary of the State of Paraná, this figure corresponding to the total of lawsuits filed by the Public Prosecutor ´s Office, through the Prosecution Offices for the Protection of Public Property of the County of the Metropolitan Region of Curitiba, Central Jurisdiction, during the period between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, before the 5 (five) Public Treasury Courts of Curitiba. Data were collected and treated by the CPJUS – Legal Research Center of Positivo University, by answering to an electronic form with prepared questions, resulting in pictures and graphs that were analyzed according to the applicable legislation and jurists’ opinions. Research focused on the performance of the public prosecutor in the extrajudicial setting, and in the judicial environment, on the correct filing of the respective lawsuits, mainly based on Law No. 8,429/92 (Administrative Improbity Law) and Law No. 7,437/83 (Civil Public Action Law). Empirical research also disclosed the current situation of the lawsuits being examined, such, as for example, the procedural stage of the researched lawsuits, if a sentence was issued and if it became final. The result is: 86% of the cases are still underway, corresponding to 169 cases and 35% of the total researched were judged, corresponding to 69 cases. These data show the need for a proactive and efficient action of the public prosecutor within the public property protection area in order to deliver to Society timely results, connected with the need for a fair Society and effective combat to corruption. It was verified that extrajudicial settlement is speedier in the desired results, with evident adhesion to public interest.