Análise comparativa de viabilidade técnica e financeira de Construção residencial utilizando painéis monolíticos de Poliestireno (EPS) e a alvenaria convencional de vedação.

• Autor(a) principal: Lima, Lorena Henrique de
• Data de Publicação: 2021
• Outros Autores: Rabêlo ,Klécio Aurelio, Santos, Stéfanny Marta de Almeida
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório do Centro Universitário Braz Cubas
• Texto Completo: https://repositorio.cruzeirodosul.edu.br/handle/123456789/3688
• topic: Métodos Construtivos; Estudo de viabilidade; Construção com painéis de EPS; 3.01.00.00-3 Engenharia Civil

The emergence of new construction methods such as construction with monolithic polystyrene panels (EPS) are opposed to conventional sealing masonry. That said, this work aims to develop a study on the construction method with EPS panels, performing technical and economic analysis, to investigate the feasibility of using EPS in the execution of residential works, contrasting it with the masonry method. conventional sealing. For this, a high-end residential project was used as a basis, with a total area equal to 321.24 m². The main parameters evaluated were the execution time and the cost of the work. In the analysis process, Eberick and TQS software were used as support tools, and Brazilian and foreign standards were consulted. The details of each construction process and its respective budget amount were also carried out through data provided by a company specialized in constructions with EPS and the SINAPI table. Based on the results, it was found th at the use of the conventional sealing masonry system resulted in a cost increase equal to R$ 262,170.64 (293.45%) in relation to the values obtained for the execution of the same residence in EPS. Furthermore, the execution time of the work in EPS was estimated at 20 days by a company specialized in the area, against six months when using the conventional system. Finally, it was also concluded that the EPS construction site is more sustainable, generating less construction waste.