NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/382 |
Resumo: | The present article seeks to make a brief presentation about the Decision Agreements, a genre that encompasses several institutes of our legal system, such as the Leniency and Non-Persecution Civil Agreements. Introduced to the genre, this article discuss to outline the institute referring to Civil Non-Persecution Agreements, a new figure in our legal order, introduced through the Anticrime Law of 2019. In this sense, starting from the teachings of Amanda Athayde and Rafael Carvalho Rezende Oliveira, this article sheds light on a series of problems involving the genre of Decision Agreements, as well as the solutions that have been put forward to resolve them. In this sense, it is already possible for the authorities to advance on several points regarding such controversies. In this way, such instrument could note be born with the same legal insecurities regarding the genre to which it belongs, and can be applied effectively. Furthermore, it is concluded that there is a need for coordination between the competent public agents to deal with crimes against public administration, in order to guarantee not only the effectiveness of the Civil Non-Persecution Agreement but also of any Decision-Making Agreement. |
id |
DPU_606e9d669d0221acacf8b0b608b9311c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/382 |
network_acronym_str |
DPU |
network_name_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVESAcordos de não persecução cível: desafios e perspectivasAcordos Decisórios.Acordo Leniência.Lei Anticrime.Acordo de Não Persecução Cível.Decision Agreements.Leniency Agreement.Anticrime Law.Civil Non-Pursuit Agreement.The present article seeks to make a brief presentation about the Decision Agreements, a genre that encompasses several institutes of our legal system, such as the Leniency and Non-Persecution Civil Agreements. Introduced to the genre, this article discuss to outline the institute referring to Civil Non-Persecution Agreements, a new figure in our legal order, introduced through the Anticrime Law of 2019. In this sense, starting from the teachings of Amanda Athayde and Rafael Carvalho Rezende Oliveira, this article sheds light on a series of problems involving the genre of Decision Agreements, as well as the solutions that have been put forward to resolve them. In this sense, it is already possible for the authorities to advance on several points regarding such controversies. In this way, such instrument could note be born with the same legal insecurities regarding the genre to which it belongs, and can be applied effectively. Furthermore, it is concluded that there is a need for coordination between the competent public agents to deal with crimes against public administration, in order to guarantee not only the effectiveness of the Civil Non-Persecution Agreement but also of any Decision-Making Agreement.A Lei n° 13.964/2019, conhecida como Pacote Anticrime trouxe importantes inovações para o ordenamento jurídico brasileiro, com destaque para o chamado Acordo de Não Persecução Cível. Trata-se de nova previsão inserida na Lei de Improbidade Administrativa (Lei n° 8.429/94) que revoga a proibição de acordo, transação ou conciliação nas ações respectivas. Nesse sentido, o presente artigo joga luz a uma série de Imbróglios envolvendo o gênero dos Acordos Decisórios, bem como as soluções que têm sido apresentadas para resolvê-los. A pertinência do debate justifica-se pela necessidade de garantia de maior segurança jurídica na utilização desses instrumentos, bem como em seu adequado aproveitamento para a proteção da própria Administração Pública.Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União2020-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/38210.46901/revistadadpu.i14.p75-93Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 14 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 75-93Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 14 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 75-93Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 14 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 75-932448-45551984-032210.46901/revistadadpu.i14reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online)instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)instacron:DPUporhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/382/228Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Defensoria Pública da Uniãohttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGuimarães de Paula, Ana PaulaCampos Faria, Luísa2020-12-18T17:11:01Zoai:ojs2.172.28.97.76:article/382Revistahttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/PUBhttps://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/oaipublicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br2448-45551984-0322opendoar:2023-01-12T16:09:36.959863Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES Acordos de não persecução cível: desafios e perspectivas |
title |
NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES |
spellingShingle |
NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES Guimarães de Paula, Ana Paula Acordos Decisórios. Acordo Leniência. Lei Anticrime. Acordo de Não Persecução Cível. Decision Agreements. Leniency Agreement. Anticrime Law. Civil Non-Pursuit Agreement. |
title_short |
NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES |
title_full |
NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES |
title_fullStr |
NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES |
title_full_unstemmed |
NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES |
title_sort |
NON-PERSECUTION AGREEMENTS: CHALLENGES AND PERSPECTIVES |
author |
Guimarães de Paula, Ana Paula |
author_facet |
Guimarães de Paula, Ana Paula Campos Faria, Luísa |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Campos Faria, Luísa |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Guimarães de Paula, Ana Paula Campos Faria, Luísa |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Acordos Decisórios. Acordo Leniência. Lei Anticrime. Acordo de Não Persecução Cível. Decision Agreements. Leniency Agreement. Anticrime Law. Civil Non-Pursuit Agreement. |
topic |
Acordos Decisórios. Acordo Leniência. Lei Anticrime. Acordo de Não Persecução Cível. Decision Agreements. Leniency Agreement. Anticrime Law. Civil Non-Pursuit Agreement. |
description |
The present article seeks to make a brief presentation about the Decision Agreements, a genre that encompasses several institutes of our legal system, such as the Leniency and Non-Persecution Civil Agreements. Introduced to the genre, this article discuss to outline the institute referring to Civil Non-Persecution Agreements, a new figure in our legal order, introduced through the Anticrime Law of 2019. In this sense, starting from the teachings of Amanda Athayde and Rafael Carvalho Rezende Oliveira, this article sheds light on a series of problems involving the genre of Decision Agreements, as well as the solutions that have been put forward to resolve them. In this sense, it is already possible for the authorities to advance on several points regarding such controversies. In this way, such instrument could note be born with the same legal insecurities regarding the genre to which it belongs, and can be applied effectively. Furthermore, it is concluded that there is a need for coordination between the competent public agents to deal with crimes against public administration, in order to guarantee not only the effectiveness of the Civil Non-Persecution Agreement but also of any Decision-Making Agreement. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/382 10.46901/revistadadpu.i14.p75-93 |
url |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/382 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.46901/revistadadpu.i14.p75-93 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistadadpu.dpu.def.br/article/view/382/228 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Nacional da Defensoria Pública da União |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; Núm. 14 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 75-93 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; n. 14 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 75-93 Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; No. 14 (2020): Revista da Defensoria Pública da União; 75-93 2448-4555 1984-0322 10.46901/revistadadpu.i14 reponame:Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) instname:Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) instacron:DPU |
instname_str |
Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
instacron_str |
DPU |
institution |
DPU |
reponame_str |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
collection |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da Defensoria Pública da União (Online) - Defensoria Pública da União (DPU) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
publicacoes.esdpu@dpu.def.br |
_version_ |
1797054103182901248 |