Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva Filho, João Luís
Data de Publicação: 2008
Outros Autores: Morello, Camilo Lélis, Farias, Francisco José Correia, Lamas, Fernando Mendes, Pedrosa, Murilo Barros, Ribeiro, José Lopes
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/122
Resumo: The objective of this work was to compare different methods used to estimate adaptability and stability of 17 cotton genotypes evaluated in 23 locations of the Brazilian savannah. Genotype and environment effects and genotype x environment interaction were significant. According to ecovalence and AMMI models, cultivar BRS Cedro showed the best stability. Varieties Delta Penta and BRS Ipê were among the most unstable genotypes, but not among the most productive. Using the methods of Eberhart & Russel, Lin & Binns and Annicchiarico, genotypes BRS 269 – Buriti, FMT 701 and CNPA GO 2001-999 were the most stable and among the five most productive on average. The evaluation of the specific adaptabilities provided by the AMMI analysis is of great importance in the study of the behavior of genotypes. The amount of information generated and the facilities of interpretation favors Lin & Binns method, which can be complemented by an AMMI analysis.
id EMBRAPA-4_605712d429ce2abe4c61c4fb201900f2
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/122
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypesComparação de métodos para avaliar a adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva em algodoeiroGossypium hirsutum; AMMI analysis; assesment of cultivars; ecovalence; genotype x environment interaction.Gossypium hirsutum; análise AMMI; avaliação de cultivares; ecovalência; interação genótipos x ambientes.The objective of this work was to compare different methods used to estimate adaptability and stability of 17 cotton genotypes evaluated in 23 locations of the Brazilian savannah. Genotype and environment effects and genotype x environment interaction were significant. According to ecovalence and AMMI models, cultivar BRS Cedro showed the best stability. Varieties Delta Penta and BRS Ipê were among the most unstable genotypes, but not among the most productive. Using the methods of Eberhart & Russel, Lin & Binns and Annicchiarico, genotypes BRS 269 – Buriti, FMT 701 and CNPA GO 2001-999 were the most stable and among the five most productive on average. The evaluation of the specific adaptabilities provided by the AMMI analysis is of great importance in the study of the behavior of genotypes. The amount of information generated and the facilities of interpretation favors Lin & Binns method, which can be complemented by an AMMI analysis.O objetivo deste trabalho foi comparar diferentes métodos de estimação da adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva em 17 genótipos de algodoeiro avaliados em 23 ambientes do Cerrado brasileiro. Os efeitos de genótipos e ambientes e a interação genótipos x ambientes foram significativos. Os modelos da ecovalência e AMMI indicaram a cultivar BRS Cedro como a mais estável, enquanto as cultivares Delta Penta e BRS Ipê foram identificadas como as mais instáveis; nenhuma delas esteve entre as mais produtivas. De acordo com o método de Eberhart & Russell, Lin & Binns e Annicchiarico, as cultivares BRS 269 – Buriti e FMT 701 e o genótipo CNPA GO 2001-999 foram os mais indicados para plantio no Cerrado, e se destacaram entre as cinco mais produtivas na média dos ambientes. A identificação de adaptabilidades específicas, proporcionada pela análise AMMI, é de grande relevância no estudo do comportamento dos genótipos. Pelo conjunto de informações obtidas e pela facilidade de uso e interpretação, recomenda-se o emprego do método de Lin & Binns , que pode ser complementado pela análise AMMI.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraSilva Filho, João LuísMorello, Camilo LélisFarias, Francisco José CorreiaLamas, Fernando MendesPedrosa, Murilo BarrosRibeiro, José Lopes2008-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/122Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.43, n.3, mar. 2008; 349-355Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.43, n.3, mar. 2008; 349-3551678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/122/6711https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/122/96info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-30T18:21:02Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/122Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-30T18:21:02Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes
Comparação de métodos para avaliar a adaptabilidade e estabilidade produtiva em algodoeiro
title Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes
spellingShingle Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes
Silva Filho, João Luís
Gossypium hirsutum; AMMI analysis; assesment of cultivars; ecovalence; genotype x environment interaction.
Gossypium hirsutum; análise AMMI; avaliação de cultivares; ecovalência; interação genótipos x ambientes.
title_short Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes
title_full Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes
title_fullStr Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes
title_sort Comparison of methods for the evaluation of adaptability and stability for yield in cotton genotypes
author Silva Filho, João Luís
author_facet Silva Filho, João Luís
Morello, Camilo Lélis
Farias, Francisco José Correia
Lamas, Fernando Mendes
Pedrosa, Murilo Barros
Ribeiro, José Lopes
author_role author
author2 Morello, Camilo Lélis
Farias, Francisco José Correia
Lamas, Fernando Mendes
Pedrosa, Murilo Barros
Ribeiro, José Lopes
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva Filho, João Luís
Morello, Camilo Lélis
Farias, Francisco José Correia
Lamas, Fernando Mendes
Pedrosa, Murilo Barros
Ribeiro, José Lopes
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gossypium hirsutum; AMMI analysis; assesment of cultivars; ecovalence; genotype x environment interaction.
Gossypium hirsutum; análise AMMI; avaliação de cultivares; ecovalência; interação genótipos x ambientes.
topic Gossypium hirsutum; AMMI analysis; assesment of cultivars; ecovalence; genotype x environment interaction.
Gossypium hirsutum; análise AMMI; avaliação de cultivares; ecovalência; interação genótipos x ambientes.
description The objective of this work was to compare different methods used to estimate adaptability and stability of 17 cotton genotypes evaluated in 23 locations of the Brazilian savannah. Genotype and environment effects and genotype x environment interaction were significant. According to ecovalence and AMMI models, cultivar BRS Cedro showed the best stability. Varieties Delta Penta and BRS Ipê were among the most unstable genotypes, but not among the most productive. Using the methods of Eberhart & Russel, Lin & Binns and Annicchiarico, genotypes BRS 269 – Buriti, FMT 701 and CNPA GO 2001-999 were the most stable and among the five most productive on average. The evaluation of the specific adaptabilities provided by the AMMI analysis is of great importance in the study of the behavior of genotypes. The amount of information generated and the facilities of interpretation favors Lin & Binns method, which can be complemented by an AMMI analysis.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-10-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/122
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/122
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/122/6711
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/downloadSuppFile/122/96
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.43, n.3, mar. 2008; 349-355
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.43, n.3, mar. 2008; 349-355
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416683213291520

Registros relacionados