Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Reis, Wagner Pereira
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto, Cruz, José Carlos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
Texto Completo: https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658
Resumo: Two experiments were carried out at Sete Lagoas and Lavras, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, during the growing season of 1982/83, in order to evaluate new planting patterns for intercropping of maize and beans. The evaluated treatments involved three maize row spacings (0.5 m, 1 m and 1.5 m), for a constant population of 40,000 plants/ha, combined with two bean populations (100,000 and 200,000 plants/ha) with three planting systems: within the rows, between the rows and both between the rows of maize. The results showed that the increment of row spacing of the maize had no effect on the grain yield of the intercropping. There was no significant effect between the systems of planting beans. This results showed once more, that planting beans within the maize rows is more advantageous due to the management facilities it provides. The highest bean plant density contributed for better productivity, and there was no effect on the grain yield maize. The competition effect reduced the grain yield of beans in 39% and the pod number was the most affected primary component of grain production, because of the reduction of the number of flowers, although the yield from the floral stage was also affected.
id EMBRAPA-4_b6239b05be175959795e49908ca33728
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15658
network_acronym_str EMBRAPA-4
network_name_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maizeArranjos e populações do feijoeiro na consorciação com o milhophaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; legumesphaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; leguminosaTwo experiments were carried out at Sete Lagoas and Lavras, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, during the growing season of 1982/83, in order to evaluate new planting patterns for intercropping of maize and beans. The evaluated treatments involved three maize row spacings (0.5 m, 1 m and 1.5 m), for a constant population of 40,000 plants/ha, combined with two bean populations (100,000 and 200,000 plants/ha) with three planting systems: within the rows, between the rows and both between the rows of maize. The results showed that the increment of row spacing of the maize had no effect on the grain yield of the intercropping. There was no significant effect between the systems of planting beans. This results showed once more, that planting beans within the maize rows is more advantageous due to the management facilities it provides. The highest bean plant density contributed for better productivity, and there was no effect on the grain yield maize. The competition effect reduced the grain yield of beans in 39% and the pod number was the most affected primary component of grain production, because of the reduction of the number of flowers, although the yield from the floral stage was also affected.Foram conduzidos dois experimentos durante o ano agrícola de 1982/83, em Sete Lagoas e Lavras, MG, visando avaliar novas alternativas de arranjos para a consorciação de milho e feijoeiro. Os tratamentos avaliados envolveram três espaçamentos da cultura do milho (0,5 m; 1 m e 1,5 m), para uma população constante de 40 mil plantas/ha, combinados com duas populações de feijoeiro (100 e 200 mil plantas/ha) e três sistemas de semeadura da leguminosa (dentro das linhas, entre as linhas, e entre e dentro das linhas do milho). Constatou-se que o incremento no espaçamento entre as linhas do milho não contribuiu para a melhoria na eficiência da consorciação. Não houve efeito significativo entre os sistemas de semeadura do feijão, mostrando, em mais esta oportunidade, que a semeadura das duas culturas na mesma linha é mais vantajosa, em virtude das facilidades de manejo que ela propicia. A utilização de maior população de plantas de feijão contribuiu para a maior produtividade, não afetando, contudo, o desempenho da gramínea. O efeito de competição do milho reduziu a produtividade do feijão em 39% e o número de vagens foi o componente primário da produção de grãos mais afetado, em razão, principalmente, da redução no número de flores no consórcio, embora o vingamento floral também fosse afetado.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraReis, Wagner PereiraRamalho, Magno Antonio PattoCruz, José Carlos2014-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.20, n.5, maio 1985; 575-584Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.20, n.5, maio 1985; 575-5841678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658/9673info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-17T11:51:02Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15658Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-17T11:51:02Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize
Arranjos e populações do feijoeiro na consorciação com o milho
title Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize
spellingShingle Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize
Reis, Wagner Pereira
phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; legumes
phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; leguminosa
title_short Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize
title_full Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize
title_fullStr Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize
title_full_unstemmed Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize
title_sort Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize
author Reis, Wagner Pereira
author_facet Reis, Wagner Pereira
Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto
Cruz, José Carlos
author_role author
author2 Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto
Cruz, José Carlos
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv

dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Reis, Wagner Pereira
Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto
Cruz, José Carlos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; legumes
phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; leguminosa
topic phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; legumes
phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; leguminosa
description Two experiments were carried out at Sete Lagoas and Lavras, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, during the growing season of 1982/83, in order to evaluate new planting patterns for intercropping of maize and beans. The evaluated treatments involved three maize row spacings (0.5 m, 1 m and 1.5 m), for a constant population of 40,000 plants/ha, combined with two bean populations (100,000 and 200,000 plants/ha) with three planting systems: within the rows, between the rows and both between the rows of maize. The results showed that the increment of row spacing of the maize had no effect on the grain yield of the intercropping. There was no significant effect between the systems of planting beans. This results showed once more, that planting beans within the maize rows is more advantageous due to the management facilities it provides. The highest bean plant density contributed for better productivity, and there was no effect on the grain yield maize. The competition effect reduced the grain yield of beans in 39% and the pod number was the most affected primary component of grain production, because of the reduction of the number of flowers, although the yield from the floral stage was also affected.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-04-17
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658
url https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658/9673
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.20, n.5, maio 1985; 575-584
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.20, n.5, maio 1985; 575-584
1678-3921
0100-104x
reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
collection Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br
_version_ 1793416668109602816