Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658 |
Resumo: | Two experiments were carried out at Sete Lagoas and Lavras, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, during the growing season of 1982/83, in order to evaluate new planting patterns for intercropping of maize and beans. The evaluated treatments involved three maize row spacings (0.5 m, 1 m and 1.5 m), for a constant population of 40,000 plants/ha, combined with two bean populations (100,000 and 200,000 plants/ha) with three planting systems: within the rows, between the rows and both between the rows of maize. The results showed that the increment of row spacing of the maize had no effect on the grain yield of the intercropping. There was no significant effect between the systems of planting beans. This results showed once more, that planting beans within the maize rows is more advantageous due to the management facilities it provides. The highest bean plant density contributed for better productivity, and there was no effect on the grain yield maize. The competition effect reduced the grain yield of beans in 39% and the pod number was the most affected primary component of grain production, because of the reduction of the number of flowers, although the yield from the floral stage was also affected. |
id |
EMBRAPA-4_b6239b05be175959795e49908ca33728 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15658 |
network_acronym_str |
EMBRAPA-4 |
network_name_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maizeArranjos e populações do feijoeiro na consorciação com o milhophaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; legumesphaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; leguminosaTwo experiments were carried out at Sete Lagoas and Lavras, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, during the growing season of 1982/83, in order to evaluate new planting patterns for intercropping of maize and beans. The evaluated treatments involved three maize row spacings (0.5 m, 1 m and 1.5 m), for a constant population of 40,000 plants/ha, combined with two bean populations (100,000 and 200,000 plants/ha) with three planting systems: within the rows, between the rows and both between the rows of maize. The results showed that the increment of row spacing of the maize had no effect on the grain yield of the intercropping. There was no significant effect between the systems of planting beans. This results showed once more, that planting beans within the maize rows is more advantageous due to the management facilities it provides. The highest bean plant density contributed for better productivity, and there was no effect on the grain yield maize. The competition effect reduced the grain yield of beans in 39% and the pod number was the most affected primary component of grain production, because of the reduction of the number of flowers, although the yield from the floral stage was also affected.Foram conduzidos dois experimentos durante o ano agrícola de 1982/83, em Sete Lagoas e Lavras, MG, visando avaliar novas alternativas de arranjos para a consorciação de milho e feijoeiro. Os tratamentos avaliados envolveram três espaçamentos da cultura do milho (0,5 m; 1 m e 1,5 m), para uma população constante de 40 mil plantas/ha, combinados com duas populações de feijoeiro (100 e 200 mil plantas/ha) e três sistemas de semeadura da leguminosa (dentro das linhas, entre as linhas, e entre e dentro das linhas do milho). Constatou-se que o incremento no espaçamento entre as linhas do milho não contribuiu para a melhoria na eficiência da consorciação. Não houve efeito significativo entre os sistemas de semeadura do feijão, mostrando, em mais esta oportunidade, que a semeadura das duas culturas na mesma linha é mais vantajosa, em virtude das facilidades de manejo que ela propicia. A utilização de maior população de plantas de feijão contribuiu para a maior produtividade, não afetando, contudo, o desempenho da gramínea. O efeito de competição do milho reduziu a produtividade do feijão em 39% e o número de vagens foi o componente primário da produção de grãos mais afetado, em razão, principalmente, da redução no número de flores no consórcio, embora o vingamento floral também fosse afetado.Pesquisa Agropecuaria BrasileiraPesquisa Agropecuária BrasileiraReis, Wagner PereiraRamalho, Magno Antonio PattoCruz, José Carlos2014-04-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.20, n.5, maio 1985; 575-584Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.20, n.5, maio 1985; 575-5841678-39210100-104xreponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPAporhttps://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658/9673info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-04-17T11:51:02Zoai:ojs.seer.sct.embrapa.br:article/15658Revistahttp://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pabPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phppab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br1678-39210100-204Xopendoar:2014-04-17T11:51:02Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize Arranjos e populações do feijoeiro na consorciação com o milho |
title |
Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize |
spellingShingle |
Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize Reis, Wagner Pereira phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; legumes phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; leguminosa |
title_short |
Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize |
title_full |
Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize |
title_fullStr |
Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize |
title_full_unstemmed |
Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize |
title_sort |
Arrangements and populations of beans in a mixed cropping with maize |
author |
Reis, Wagner Pereira |
author_facet |
Reis, Wagner Pereira Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto Cruz, José Carlos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto Cruz, José Carlos |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Reis, Wagner Pereira Ramalho, Magno Antonio Patto Cruz, José Carlos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; legumes phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; leguminosa |
topic |
phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; legumes phaseolus vulgaris; zea mays; leguminosa |
description |
Two experiments were carried out at Sete Lagoas and Lavras, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil, during the growing season of 1982/83, in order to evaluate new planting patterns for intercropping of maize and beans. The evaluated treatments involved three maize row spacings (0.5 m, 1 m and 1.5 m), for a constant population of 40,000 plants/ha, combined with two bean populations (100,000 and 200,000 plants/ha) with three planting systems: within the rows, between the rows and both between the rows of maize. The results showed that the increment of row spacing of the maize had no effect on the grain yield of the intercropping. There was no significant effect between the systems of planting beans. This results showed once more, that planting beans within the maize rows is more advantageous due to the management facilities it provides. The highest bean plant density contributed for better productivity, and there was no effect on the grain yield maize. The competition effect reduced the grain yield of beans in 39% and the pod number was the most affected primary component of grain production, because of the reduction of the number of flowers, although the yield from the floral stage was also affected. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-04-17 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658 |
url |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://seer.sct.embrapa.br/index.php/pab/article/view/15658/9673 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira; v.20, n.5, maio 1985; 575-584 Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira; v.20, n.5, maio 1985; 575-584 1678-3921 0100-104x reponame:Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) instacron:EMBRAPA |
instname_str |
Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
instacron_str |
EMBRAPA |
institution |
EMBRAPA |
reponame_str |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
collection |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira (Online) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
pab@sct.embrapa.br || sct.pab@embrapa.br |
_version_ |
1793416668109602816 |