Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: DEVENS, J.
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: CARVALHO, P. de, BOURSCHEIDT, M. L. B., NASCIMENTO, H. L. B., PEREIRA, D. H., PEDREIRA, B. C. e
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
Texto Completo: http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1086302
Resumo: The use of legumes in pasture is an economic and sustainable option to include nitrogen in forage-based production systems. Despite this, the low persistence of legumes in pastures is pointed out as one of the main causes of low adoption of the consortium. In this context, this study aimed to evaluated botanical composition of pasture of Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça in consortium with Arachis pintoi. The experiment was carried out in Terra Nova do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil, in a randomized complete block design (2x2), with two cultivars (Belmonte and Mandobi) and two planting spacing (1x1 and 2x2 m). With three replicates, totaling 12 experimental units. The sampling were taken on November 5, 2016, one year after of implantation. Two quadrats of 1 m² were collected at soil level per plot, total mass was weighed and sub-sampled for determination of botanical composition of the pasture. The data were analyzed using the method of mixed models with special parametric structure in the covariance matrix, through MIXED procedure of the statistical software SAS. In order to choose the covariance matrix, the Akaike information criterion was used. The means of treatments were estimated through the "LSMEANS" and the comparison between them was performed using the probability of difference ("PDIFF") at a significance level of 10 %. There was no plant spacing or cultivar effect on the percentage of legume (P>0.10) Mandobi and Belmonte representing 2.1% and 3.7% of total biomass, respectively. The percentage of Mombaça guineagrass was around 97%. There was a difference in the yield for cultivars (P=0.0972), but did not differ for plant spacing (P=0.3913). Consortium pastures with Belmonte registered higher amount of legume (1155 kg ha-1) than those with Mandobi (415 kg ha-1). The forage peanut Belmonte and Mandobi can be consider to establish consortium pastures in Amazon Biome. However, Belmonte can contribute more for total biomass.
id EMBR_49d396190203aff1ea150bf7ef2aa994
oai_identifier_str oai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1086302
network_acronym_str EMBR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository_id_str 2154
spelling Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.GuineagrassArachis pintoiBotanical compositionMegathyrsus maximusThe use of legumes in pasture is an economic and sustainable option to include nitrogen in forage-based production systems. Despite this, the low persistence of legumes in pastures is pointed out as one of the main causes of low adoption of the consortium. In this context, this study aimed to evaluated botanical composition of pasture of Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça in consortium with Arachis pintoi. The experiment was carried out in Terra Nova do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil, in a randomized complete block design (2x2), with two cultivars (Belmonte and Mandobi) and two planting spacing (1x1 and 2x2 m). With three replicates, totaling 12 experimental units. The sampling were taken on November 5, 2016, one year after of implantation. Two quadrats of 1 m² were collected at soil level per plot, total mass was weighed and sub-sampled for determination of botanical composition of the pasture. The data were analyzed using the method of mixed models with special parametric structure in the covariance matrix, through MIXED procedure of the statistical software SAS. In order to choose the covariance matrix, the Akaike information criterion was used. The means of treatments were estimated through the "LSMEANS" and the comparison between them was performed using the probability of difference ("PDIFF") at a significance level of 10 %. There was no plant spacing or cultivar effect on the percentage of legume (P>0.10) Mandobi and Belmonte representing 2.1% and 3.7% of total biomass, respectively. The percentage of Mombaça guineagrass was around 97%. There was a difference in the yield for cultivars (P=0.0972), but did not differ for plant spacing (P=0.3913). Consortium pastures with Belmonte registered higher amount of legume (1155 kg ha-1) than those with Mandobi (415 kg ha-1). The forage peanut Belmonte and Mandobi can be consider to establish consortium pastures in Amazon Biome. However, Belmonte can contribute more for total biomass.JOSIANE DEVENS, UFMT-SINOP; PERIVALDO DE CARVALHO, UFMT-CUIABA; MAIRA L. B. BOURSCHEIDT, UFMT-SINOP; HEMYTHON L. B. NASCIMENTO, UFV; DALTON H. PEREIRA, UFMT-SINOP; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT.DEVENS, J.CARVALHO, P. deBOURSCHEIDT, M. L. B.NASCIMENTO, H. L. B.PEREIRA, D. H.PEDREIRA, B. C. e2018-01-25T23:36:20Z2018-01-25T23:36:20Z2018-01-2520172018-01-25T23:36:20ZResumo em anais e proceedingsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionIn: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 54., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu. A new view of animal science: challenges and perspectives: Proceedings. Foz do Iguaçu: SBZ, 2017. p. 621.1983-4357http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1086302enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)instacron:EMBRAPA2018-01-25T23:36:27Zoai:www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br:doc/1086302Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/oai/requestcg-riaa@embrapa.bropendoar:21542018-01-25T23:36:27Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.
title Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.
spellingShingle Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.
DEVENS, J.
Guineagrass
Arachis pintoi
Botanical composition
Megathyrsus maximus
title_short Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.
title_full Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.
title_fullStr Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.
title_full_unstemmed Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.
title_sort Forage biomass and botanical composition of consortium pasture with forage peanut.
author DEVENS, J.
author_facet DEVENS, J.
CARVALHO, P. de
BOURSCHEIDT, M. L. B.
NASCIMENTO, H. L. B.
PEREIRA, D. H.
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
author_role author
author2 CARVALHO, P. de
BOURSCHEIDT, M. L. B.
NASCIMENTO, H. L. B.
PEREIRA, D. H.
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv JOSIANE DEVENS, UFMT-SINOP; PERIVALDO DE CARVALHO, UFMT-CUIABA; MAIRA L. B. BOURSCHEIDT, UFMT-SINOP; HEMYTHON L. B. NASCIMENTO, UFV; DALTON H. PEREIRA, UFMT-SINOP; BRUNO CARNEIRO E PEDREIRA, CPAMT.
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv DEVENS, J.
CARVALHO, P. de
BOURSCHEIDT, M. L. B.
NASCIMENTO, H. L. B.
PEREIRA, D. H.
PEDREIRA, B. C. e
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Guineagrass
Arachis pintoi
Botanical composition
Megathyrsus maximus
topic Guineagrass
Arachis pintoi
Botanical composition
Megathyrsus maximus
description The use of legumes in pasture is an economic and sustainable option to include nitrogen in forage-based production systems. Despite this, the low persistence of legumes in pastures is pointed out as one of the main causes of low adoption of the consortium. In this context, this study aimed to evaluated botanical composition of pasture of Panicum maximum cv. Mombaça in consortium with Arachis pintoi. The experiment was carried out in Terra Nova do Norte, Mato Grosso, Brazil, in a randomized complete block design (2x2), with two cultivars (Belmonte and Mandobi) and two planting spacing (1x1 and 2x2 m). With three replicates, totaling 12 experimental units. The sampling were taken on November 5, 2016, one year after of implantation. Two quadrats of 1 m² were collected at soil level per plot, total mass was weighed and sub-sampled for determination of botanical composition of the pasture. The data were analyzed using the method of mixed models with special parametric structure in the covariance matrix, through MIXED procedure of the statistical software SAS. In order to choose the covariance matrix, the Akaike information criterion was used. The means of treatments were estimated through the "LSMEANS" and the comparison between them was performed using the probability of difference ("PDIFF") at a significance level of 10 %. There was no plant spacing or cultivar effect on the percentage of legume (P>0.10) Mandobi and Belmonte representing 2.1% and 3.7% of total biomass, respectively. The percentage of Mombaça guineagrass was around 97%. There was a difference in the yield for cultivars (P=0.0972), but did not differ for plant spacing (P=0.3913). Consortium pastures with Belmonte registered higher amount of legume (1155 kg ha-1) than those with Mandobi (415 kg ha-1). The forage peanut Belmonte and Mandobi can be consider to establish consortium pastures in Amazon Biome. However, Belmonte can contribute more for total biomass.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2018-01-25T23:36:20Z
2018-01-25T23:36:20Z
2018-01-25
2018-01-25T23:36:20Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Resumo em anais e proceedings
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 54., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu. A new view of animal science: challenges and perspectives: Proceedings. Foz do Iguaçu: SBZ, 2017. p. 621.
1983-4357
http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1086302
identifier_str_mv In: REUNIÃO ANUAL DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ZOOTECNIA, 54., 2017, Foz do Iguaçu. A new view of animal science: challenges and perspectives: Proceedings. Foz do Iguaçu: SBZ, 2017. p. 621.
1983-4357
url http://www.alice.cnptia.embrapa.br/alice/handle/doc/1086302
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
instname:Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron:EMBRAPA
instname_str Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
instacron_str EMBRAPA
institution EMBRAPA
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
collection Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da EMBRAPA (Repository Open Access to Scientific Information from EMBRAPA - Alice) - Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária (Embrapa)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cg-riaa@embrapa.br
_version_ 1817695499934760960