Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approval

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira, Edivaldo Alvarenga
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Carmo, Jairo Vasconcelos Rodrigues
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista da EMERJ (Online)
Texto Completo: https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/370
Resumo: The article aims to demonstrate the effectiveness against third parties of mediation agreements between private parties, regardless of judicial approval, invoking jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice, which refuses to ratify extrajudicial transactions. In Brazil, it is usual to ratify in court agreements subject to private negotiations, a practice that interested parties seek to extend to the final terms of mediation. The trend towards de-judicialization reinforces the principle of inescapability of jurisdiction, established in the Constitution (art.5, XXXV), by reserving judges and courts for the judgment of indisputably contentious cases. The interconnection to the notary-registry system of the extrajudicial enforceable title, arising from mediation agreements, facilitates the fulfillment of obligations, given the general effects of publicity and public faith, different from the scope of res judicata, restricted to the parties to the process, and always post -conflictual.
id EMERJ-2_22492032b6c35f45b59667435a6dda49
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/370
network_acronym_str EMERJ-2
network_name_str Revista da EMERJ (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approvalEFICACIA CONTRA TERCEROS DE LA MEDIACIÓN PRIVADA INDEPENDIENTEMENTE DE LA APROBACIÓN JUDICIALEficácia contra terceiros da mediação privada independente de homologação judicialmediaçãoacordoshomologaçãocumprimentoregistro públicomediationagreementsapprovalcompliancepublic registryThe article aims to demonstrate the effectiveness against third parties of mediation agreements between private parties, regardless of judicial approval, invoking jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice, which refuses to ratify extrajudicial transactions. In Brazil, it is usual to ratify in court agreements subject to private negotiations, a practice that interested parties seek to extend to the final terms of mediation. The trend towards de-judicialization reinforces the principle of inescapability of jurisdiction, established in the Constitution (art.5, XXXV), by reserving judges and courts for the judgment of indisputably contentious cases. The interconnection to the notary-registry system of the extrajudicial enforceable title, arising from mediation agreements, facilitates the fulfillment of obligations, given the general effects of publicity and public faith, different from the scope of res judicata, restricted to the parties to the process, and always post -conflictual.El artículo tiene como objetivo demostrar la efectividad frente a terceros de los acuerdos de mediación entre particulares, independientemente de la aprobación judicial, invocando la jurisprudencia de la Corte Superior de Justicia, que se niega a aprobar transacciones extrajudiciales. En Brasil, es habitual la ratificación judicial de acuerdos sujetos a negociación privada, práctica que los interesados ​​buscan extender hasta los términos finales de la mediación. La tendencia a la desjudicialización refuerza el principio de ineludibilidad de la jurisdicción, consagrado en la Constitución (art. 5, XXXV), al reservar a jueces y tribunales para la sentencia de casos indiscutiblemente contenciosos. La interconexión al sistema notarial-registral del título ejecutivo extrajudicial, derivada de convenios de mediación, facilita el cumplimiento de las obligaciones, dados los efectos generales de publicidad y fe pública, distintos del ámbito de cosa juzgada, restringidos a las partes del proceso. y siempre posconflicto.O artigo visa demonstrar a eficácia contra terceiros dos acordos de mediação entre particulares, independente de homologação judicial, invocando jurisprudência do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, que recusa homologar transações extrajudiciais. No Brasil, é usual homologar-se em juízo acordos objeto de negociações privadas, prática que os interessados buscam estender aos termos finais de mediação. A tendência à desjudicialização reforça o princípio da inafastabilidade da jurisdição, positivado na Constituição (art.5º, XXXV), por reservar juízes e tribunais ao julgamento dos casos indiscutivelmente litigiosos. A interconexão ao sistema notário-registral do título executivo extrajudicial, oriundo dos acordos de mediação, facilita o cumprimento das obrigações, dado os efeitos gerais da publicidade e fé pública, diferente do alcance da coisa julgada, restrita às partes do processo, e sempre pós-conflitual.Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/370Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 2 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 69-862236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/370/186Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira, Edivaldo AlvarengaCarmo, Jairo Vasconcelos Rodrigues2023-12-12T13:54:49Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/370Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-12-12T13:54:49Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approval
EFICACIA CONTRA TERCEROS DE LA MEDIACIÓN PRIVADA INDEPENDIENTEMENTE DE LA APROBACIÓN JUDICIAL
Eficácia contra terceiros da mediação privada independente de homologação judicial
title Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approval
spellingShingle Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approval
Pereira, Edivaldo Alvarenga
mediação
acordos
homologação
cumprimento
registro público
mediation
agreements
approval
compliance
public registry
title_short Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approval
title_full Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approval
title_fullStr Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approval
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approval
title_sort Effectiveness against third parties of private mediation regardless of judicial approval
author Pereira, Edivaldo Alvarenga
author_facet Pereira, Edivaldo Alvarenga
Carmo, Jairo Vasconcelos Rodrigues
author_role author
author2 Carmo, Jairo Vasconcelos Rodrigues
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira, Edivaldo Alvarenga
Carmo, Jairo Vasconcelos Rodrigues
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv mediação
acordos
homologação
cumprimento
registro público
mediation
agreements
approval
compliance
public registry
topic mediação
acordos
homologação
cumprimento
registro público
mediation
agreements
approval
compliance
public registry
description The article aims to demonstrate the effectiveness against third parties of mediation agreements between private parties, regardless of judicial approval, invoking jurisprudence of the Superior Court of Justice, which refuses to ratify extrajudicial transactions. In Brazil, it is usual to ratify in court agreements subject to private negotiations, a practice that interested parties seek to extend to the final terms of mediation. The trend towards de-judicialization reinforces the principle of inescapability of jurisdiction, established in the Constitution (art.5, XXXV), by reserving judges and courts for the judgment of indisputably contentious cases. The interconnection to the notary-registry system of the extrajudicial enforceable title, arising from mediation agreements, facilitates the fulfillment of obligations, given the general effects of publicity and public faith, different from the scope of res judicata, restricted to the parties to the process, and always post -conflictual.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-08
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/370
url https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/370
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/370/186
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 2 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 69-86
2236-8957
1415-4951
reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)
instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron:EMERJ
instname_str Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
instacron_str EMERJ
institution EMERJ
reponame_str Revista da EMERJ (Online)
collection Revista da EMERJ (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br
_version_ 1797041854627184640

Registros relacionados