The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violence
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/411 |
Resumo: | This article aims to present the results of a research on the Superior Court of Justice’s judgments, referring to domestic violence cases, carried out during the first years of Maria da Penha Law’s validity. Using a detailed methodology, the survey highlights eleven specific issues that, as it was found, were constantly repeated in such judgments over the aforementioned years, and discusses how the category of gender is or is not determinant in these debates. The data indicates both changes in understanding and solidification of the Court's positions in judgments on domestic violence in the time frame used, whose effects impact the way the Maria da Penha Law is interpreted and applied by the Courts in Brazil. It is intended that, at the end of this article, the reader understands that the construction of a solid jurisprudence, consistent with the objectives pursued with the promulgation of the aforementioned law, does not result from a simple automatic application of this law but, on the contrary, is the result of an intense interpretative dispute not only about legal provisions, but also about gender roles in society. |
id |
EMERJ-2_8663a9d354f3b67995332697ff4ba2a5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/411 |
network_acronym_str |
EMERJ-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violenceA interpretação da lei maria da penha pelo superior tribunal de justiça: Os primeiros passos de uma jurisprudência sobre violência domésticalei maria da penhastjgêneromaria da penha lawstjgenderThis article aims to present the results of a research on the Superior Court of Justice’s judgments, referring to domestic violence cases, carried out during the first years of Maria da Penha Law’s validity. Using a detailed methodology, the survey highlights eleven specific issues that, as it was found, were constantly repeated in such judgments over the aforementioned years, and discusses how the category of gender is or is not determinant in these debates. The data indicates both changes in understanding and solidification of the Court's positions in judgments on domestic violence in the time frame used, whose effects impact the way the Maria da Penha Law is interpreted and applied by the Courts in Brazil. It is intended that, at the end of this article, the reader understands that the construction of a solid jurisprudence, consistent with the objectives pursued with the promulgation of the aforementioned law, does not result from a simple automatic application of this law but, on the contrary, is the result of an intense interpretative dispute not only about legal provisions, but also about gender roles in society.Este artigo busca apresentar os resultados de uma pesquisa que analisou os julgamentos do Superior Tribunal de Justiça, sobre casos de violência doméstica, realizados durante os primeiros anos de vigência da Lei Maria da Penha. Usando uma metodologia detalhada, o levantamento destaca onze questões específicas que, verificou-se, se repetiram de maneira constante em tais julgamentos ao longo dos referidos anos, e discute de que forma a categoria de gênero foi ou não determinante nesses debates. Os dados indicam tanto mudanças de entendimento quanto solidificação de posicionamentos da Corte em julgamentos sobre violência doméstica no marco temporal utilizado, cujos efeitos impactam a forma como a Lei Maria da Penha é interpretada e aplicada pelos Tribunais no país. Pretende-se que, ao final deste artigo, a pessoa leitora compreenda que a construção de uma sólida jurisprudência, consentânea com os objetivos buscados com a promulgação da referida lei, não decorre de uma simples aplicação automática desta mas, ao contrário, é o resultado de uma intensa disputa interpretativa não apenas sobre os dispositivos legais, mas também sobre os papéis de gênero na sociedade.Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2022-02-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/411Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 2 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 41-682236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/411/185Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCastro, Carolina Soares Castelliano Lucena deSilva, Isadora de OliveiraFaria, Gisele Soares de OliveiraMiller, Carolina Mendes de OliveiraBarbastefano, Giovanna NevesFikota, Marina Mendes2023-12-11T18:33:08Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/411Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-12-11T18:33:08Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violence A interpretação da lei maria da penha pelo superior tribunal de justiça: Os primeiros passos de uma jurisprudência sobre violência doméstica |
title |
The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violence |
spellingShingle |
The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violence Castro, Carolina Soares Castelliano Lucena de lei maria da penha stj gênero maria da penha law stj gender |
title_short |
The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violence |
title_full |
The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violence |
title_fullStr |
The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violence |
title_full_unstemmed |
The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violence |
title_sort |
The interpretation of the maria da penha law by the superior court of justice: The first steps of a jurisprudence on domestic violence |
author |
Castro, Carolina Soares Castelliano Lucena de |
author_facet |
Castro, Carolina Soares Castelliano Lucena de Silva, Isadora de Oliveira Faria, Gisele Soares de Oliveira Miller, Carolina Mendes de Oliveira Barbastefano, Giovanna Neves Fikota, Marina Mendes |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Isadora de Oliveira Faria, Gisele Soares de Oliveira Miller, Carolina Mendes de Oliveira Barbastefano, Giovanna Neves Fikota, Marina Mendes |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Castro, Carolina Soares Castelliano Lucena de Silva, Isadora de Oliveira Faria, Gisele Soares de Oliveira Miller, Carolina Mendes de Oliveira Barbastefano, Giovanna Neves Fikota, Marina Mendes |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
lei maria da penha stj gênero maria da penha law stj gender |
topic |
lei maria da penha stj gênero maria da penha law stj gender |
description |
This article aims to present the results of a research on the Superior Court of Justice’s judgments, referring to domestic violence cases, carried out during the first years of Maria da Penha Law’s validity. Using a detailed methodology, the survey highlights eleven specific issues that, as it was found, were constantly repeated in such judgments over the aforementioned years, and discusses how the category of gender is or is not determinant in these debates. The data indicates both changes in understanding and solidification of the Court's positions in judgments on domestic violence in the time frame used, whose effects impact the way the Maria da Penha Law is interpreted and applied by the Courts in Brazil. It is intended that, at the end of this article, the reader understands that the construction of a solid jurisprudence, consistent with the objectives pursued with the promulgation of the aforementioned law, does not result from a simple automatic application of this law but, on the contrary, is the result of an intense interpretative dispute not only about legal provisions, but also about gender roles in society. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-02-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/411 |
url |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/411 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/411/185 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 2 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 41-68 2236-8957 1415-4951 reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online) instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) instacron:EMERJ |
instname_str |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
instacron_str |
EMERJ |
institution |
EMERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
collection |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br |
_version_ |
1797041854646059008 |