TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/24 |
Resumo: | In Brazilian jurisprudence, Post-Positivism (or Neoconstitutionalism) is a kind of unique discourse. Built on a caricature of its predecessor, Post-Positivism does not offer consistent solutions to the problems of Legal Positivism. In fact, it ends up being a great retrocession to Natural Law, presenting exactly the same problems that Legal Positivism, more than a century ago, struggled to correct. A democratic legal practice does not presuppose “leaving aside” Legal Positivism. It can only be made “from” it. |
id |
EMERJ-2_a0dd01ccd2c31556b2052bc4df4eb86d |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/24 |
network_acronym_str |
EMERJ-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICEPOR UMA TEORIA PURA DOS PRINCÍPIOS: A FARSA DO NEOCONSTITUCIONALISMO, OS LIMITES DE UMA TEORIA SOBRE O DIREITO E O CAMINHO PARA UMA PRÁTICA JURÍDICA CONSISTENTEproblemas do pós-positivismopositivismo jurídicoprática jurídicaproblems of post-positivismlegal positivismlegal practiceIn Brazilian jurisprudence, Post-Positivism (or Neoconstitutionalism) is a kind of unique discourse. Built on a caricature of its predecessor, Post-Positivism does not offer consistent solutions to the problems of Legal Positivism. In fact, it ends up being a great retrocession to Natural Law, presenting exactly the same problems that Legal Positivism, more than a century ago, struggled to correct. A democratic legal practice does not presuppose “leaving aside” Legal Positivism. It can only be made “from” it.Na Teoria do Direito brasileira, o Pós-Positivismo (ou Neoconstitucionalismo) é uma espécie de discurso único. Construído sobre uma caricatura de seu antecessor, o Pós-Positivismo não apresenta soluções consistentes para os problemas do Positivismo Jurídico. Na verdade, acaba sendo um grande retrocesso ao Direito Natural, apresentando exatamente os mesmos problemas que o Positivismo Jurídico, há mais de um século, esforçou-se para corrigir. Uma prática jurídica democrática não pressupõe o “abandono” do Positivismo Jurídico. Ela somente pode ser feita “a partir” dele.EMERJ2017-10-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/24Revista da EMERJ; v. 20 n. 79 (2017): Revista da EMERJ (Numeração antiga); 309-3472236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/24/20Copyright (c) 2017 Revista da EMERJinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessValadão, Rodrigo Borges2023-04-19T01:54:36Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/24Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-04-19T01:54:36Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE POR UMA TEORIA PURA DOS PRINCÍPIOS: A FARSA DO NEOCONSTITUCIONALISMO, OS LIMITES DE UMA TEORIA SOBRE O DIREITO E O CAMINHO PARA UMA PRÁTICA JURÍDICA CONSISTENTE |
title |
TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE |
spellingShingle |
TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE Valadão, Rodrigo Borges problemas do pós-positivismo positivismo jurídico prática jurídica problems of post-positivism legal positivism legal practice |
title_short |
TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE |
title_full |
TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE |
title_fullStr |
TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE |
title_full_unstemmed |
TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE |
title_sort |
TOWARDS A PURE THEORY OF PRINCIPLES: THE LIES OF NEOCONSTITUTIONALISM, LIMITS OF A LEGAL THEORY, AND THE PATH TO A CONSISTENT LEGAL PRACTICE |
author |
Valadão, Rodrigo Borges |
author_facet |
Valadão, Rodrigo Borges |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Valadão, Rodrigo Borges |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
problemas do pós-positivismo positivismo jurídico prática jurídica problems of post-positivism legal positivism legal practice |
topic |
problemas do pós-positivismo positivismo jurídico prática jurídica problems of post-positivism legal positivism legal practice |
description |
In Brazilian jurisprudence, Post-Positivism (or Neoconstitutionalism) is a kind of unique discourse. Built on a caricature of its predecessor, Post-Positivism does not offer consistent solutions to the problems of Legal Positivism. In fact, it ends up being a great retrocession to Natural Law, presenting exactly the same problems that Legal Positivism, more than a century ago, struggled to correct. A democratic legal practice does not presuppose “leaving aside” Legal Positivism. It can only be made “from” it. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-10-23 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/24 |
url |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/24 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/24/20 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista da EMERJ info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2017 Revista da EMERJ |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EMERJ |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
EMERJ |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ; v. 20 n. 79 (2017): Revista da EMERJ (Numeração antiga); 309-347 2236-8957 1415-4951 reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online) instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) instacron:EMERJ |
instname_str |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
instacron_str |
EMERJ |
institution |
EMERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
collection |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br |
_version_ |
1797041854735187968 |