Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law?
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/391 |
Resumo: | With the traumas caused by World War II, criticisms of the juridical positivist model were made, arising a so-called neoconstitutional post-positivis current. This current has as mains bases a new understanding of the Constitution and the relation between Law and Moral in juridical decisions. Despite this new perspective, the juridical positivism persists with its reformulations created from the criticisms attributed to the neoconstitutional vision. This article aims expose the foundations of both neoconstituionalism and juridical positivism, criticize each of them, as well expose the scope of the neoconstitutional claim in relation to the Theory of Law: whether a paradigm or a finishing operation on the positive juridical building. |
id |
EMERJ-2_1857485277a3857126df7fa125100002 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/391 |
network_acronym_str |
EMERJ-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law?Neoconstitucionalismo: Uma nova teoria do direito?NeoconstitucionalismoPositivismo jurídicoNeopositivismoPós-positivismoTeoria do Direitoneocnstitutionalismjuridical positivismneopositivismpost-positivismtheory of lawWith the traumas caused by World War II, criticisms of the juridical positivist model were made, arising a so-called neoconstitutional post-positivis current. This current has as mains bases a new understanding of the Constitution and the relation between Law and Moral in juridical decisions. Despite this new perspective, the juridical positivism persists with its reformulations created from the criticisms attributed to the neoconstitutional vision. This article aims expose the foundations of both neoconstituionalism and juridical positivism, criticize each of them, as well expose the scope of the neoconstitutional claim in relation to the Theory of Law: whether a paradigm or a finishing operation on the positive juridical building.Com os traumas causados pela Segunda Guerra Mundial, críticas ao modelo positivista jurídico foram feitas, surgindo uma autodenominada corrente pós-positivista neoconstitucional. Tal corrente tem como principais bases uma nova compreensão da Constituição e a relação entre Direito e Moral nas decisões jurídicas. Apesar dessa nova perspectiva, o positivismo jurídico persiste com suas reformulações criadas a partir das críticas atribuída à visão neoconstitucional. Este artigo visa expor as fundações tanto do neoconstitucionalismo quanto do positivismo jurídico, tecer críticas a cada uma delas, bem como expor a abrangência da pretensão neoconstitucional em relação à Teoria Geral do Direito: se um paradigma ou se uma operação de acabamento sobre o edifício jurídico positivo.Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro2021-09-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/391Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 1 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 95-1152236-89571415-4951reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online)instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)instacron:EMERJporhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/391/174Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessde Pádua, Felipe Bizinoto Soares2023-12-12T13:04:21Zoai:ojs2.emerj.jus.br:article/391Revistahttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/indexPUBhttps://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/oairevistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br2236-89571415-4951opendoar:2023-12-12T13:04:21Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law? Neoconstitucionalismo: Uma nova teoria do direito? |
title |
Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law? |
spellingShingle |
Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law? de Pádua, Felipe Bizinoto Soares Neoconstitucionalismo Positivismo jurídico Neopositivismo Pós-positivismo Teoria do Direito neocnstitutionalism juridical positivism neopositivism post-positivism theory of law |
title_short |
Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law? |
title_full |
Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law? |
title_fullStr |
Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law? |
title_sort |
Neoconstitutionalism: A new theory of law? |
author |
de Pádua, Felipe Bizinoto Soares |
author_facet |
de Pádua, Felipe Bizinoto Soares |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
de Pádua, Felipe Bizinoto Soares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Neoconstitucionalismo Positivismo jurídico Neopositivismo Pós-positivismo Teoria do Direito neocnstitutionalism juridical positivism neopositivism post-positivism theory of law |
topic |
Neoconstitucionalismo Positivismo jurídico Neopositivismo Pós-positivismo Teoria do Direito neocnstitutionalism juridical positivism neopositivism post-positivism theory of law |
description |
With the traumas caused by World War II, criticisms of the juridical positivist model were made, arising a so-called neoconstitutional post-positivis current. This current has as mains bases a new understanding of the Constitution and the relation between Law and Moral in juridical decisions. Despite this new perspective, the juridical positivism persists with its reformulations created from the criticisms attributed to the neoconstitutional vision. This article aims expose the foundations of both neoconstituionalism and juridical positivism, criticize each of them, as well expose the scope of the neoconstitutional claim in relation to the Theory of Law: whether a paradigm or a finishing operation on the positive juridical building. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/391 |
url |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/391 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://ojs.emerj.com.br/index.php/revistadaemerj/article/view/391/174 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista da EMERJ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ; v. 24 n. 1 (2022): Revista da EMERJ; 95-115 2236-8957 1415-4951 reponame:Revista da EMERJ (Online) instname:Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) instacron:EMERJ |
instname_str |
Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
instacron_str |
EMERJ |
institution |
EMERJ |
reponame_str |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
collection |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista da EMERJ (Online) - Escola da Magistratura do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (EMERJ) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
revistadaemerj@tjrj.jus.br |
_version_ |
1797041854635573248 |