THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATION
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Esmat |
Texto Completo: | http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/588 |
Resumo: | The registrability of documents presented to the public registry service must be checked by those who are delegates of this public service: the public registrars. The registration examination is an eminently intellectual and legal activity called registration qualification. The analysis of titles submitted for registration must comply with objective technical rules and a variety of aspects that must be considered in view of the registration claim. The public registrar’s decision, in addition to the properly legal-formal aspects of the title, covers non-registration normative aspects of economic or environmental origin, or even linked to the protection of assets of aesthetic, artistic, scenic and historical value, and to the observation of rules in federal, state and municipal laws, as well as acts of the courts' internal affairs bodies. Thus, seeing that the registration act is an activity that has become increasingly complex, this article aims to reflect on the registrar’s duty to substantiate and to be responsible for controlling, at the time of registration, the presence and compliance with the registration requirements of the titles presented to the registry office. Given this, the research’s question is: Do registrars have a duty to justify their registration qualification decisions? The aim, therefore, is to present some reflections on the registration decision, in search of a legal theory of the decision applicable to public records. |
id |
ESMAT_9192e0d063d8ea430b9604a8c70bf7fb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/588 |
network_acronym_str |
ESMAT |
network_name_str |
Revista Esmat |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATIONO DEVER DE FUNDAMENTAR DO REGISTRADOR: POR UMA TEORIA DA DECISÃO APLICÁVEL À QUALIFICAÇÃO REGISTRALRegistros Públicos. Qualificação Registral. Teoria da Decisão. Decidibilidade. Fundamentação Jurídica.Public Records. Registration Qualification. Decision Theory. Decidability. Legal Basis.The registrability of documents presented to the public registry service must be checked by those who are delegates of this public service: the public registrars. The registration examination is an eminently intellectual and legal activity called registration qualification. The analysis of titles submitted for registration must comply with objective technical rules and a variety of aspects that must be considered in view of the registration claim. The public registrar’s decision, in addition to the properly legal-formal aspects of the title, covers non-registration normative aspects of economic or environmental origin, or even linked to the protection of assets of aesthetic, artistic, scenic and historical value, and to the observation of rules in federal, state and municipal laws, as well as acts of the courts' internal affairs bodies. Thus, seeing that the registration act is an activity that has become increasingly complex, this article aims to reflect on the registrar’s duty to substantiate and to be responsible for controlling, at the time of registration, the presence and compliance with the registration requirements of the titles presented to the registry office. Given this, the research’s question is: Do registrars have a duty to justify their registration qualification decisions? The aim, therefore, is to present some reflections on the registration decision, in search of a legal theory of the decision applicable to public records.A registrabilidade dos documentos apresentados perante o serviço de registro público deve ser aferida por aqueles que são delegados desse serviço público: os registradores públicos. O exame da registrabilidade é uma atividade denominada de qualificação registral. Trata-se de uma atividade eminentemente intelectual e jurídica. A análise dos títulos apresentados a registro deve obedecer às regras técnicas objetivas e a mais uma diversidade de aspectos que devem ser considerados diante da pretensão registral. A decisão do registrador público, além dos aspectos propriamente jurídico-formais do título, abrange aspectos normativos de ordem não registral, de origem econômica, ambiental ou mesmo de proteção dos bens de valor estético, artístico, paisagístico e histórico, e de observar regras de leis federais, estaduais e municipais, bem como atos das corregedorias dos tribunais. Assim, o ato registral é uma atividade que tem se tornado cada vez mais complexa. Este artigo visa refletir sobre o dever de fundamentar do registrador, o qual tem a responsabilidade de controlar, por ocasião da qualificação registral, a presença e o cumprimento dos requisitos de registrabilidade dos títulos apresentados a cartório. A pergunta de pesquisa é: Os registradores têm o dever de fundamentar as suas decisões de qualificação registral? Pretende-se, portanto, apresentar algumas reflexões acerca da decisão registral, em busca de uma teoria jurídica da decisão aplicável aos registros públicos.ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT2024-02-28info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/58810.29327/270098.15.26-6ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 15 No. 26 (2023); 121-138REVISTA ESMAT; v. 15 n. 26 (2023); 121-1382447-98962177-0360reponame:Revista Esmatinstname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)instacron:ESMATporenghttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/588/448http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/588/493Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA ESMAThttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFaria Pereira, GustavoFreitas Filho, RobertoMacedo de Miranda, Bartira2024-07-04T20:06:12Zoai:ojs.esmat.tjto.jus.br:article/588Revistahttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/indexPUBhttp://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/oai||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br2447-98962177-0360opendoar:2024-07-04T20:06:12Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATION O DEVER DE FUNDAMENTAR DO REGISTRADOR: POR UMA TEORIA DA DECISÃO APLICÁVEL À QUALIFICAÇÃO REGISTRAL |
title |
THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATION |
spellingShingle |
THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATION Faria Pereira, Gustavo Registros Públicos. Qualificação Registral. Teoria da Decisão. Decidibilidade. Fundamentação Jurídica. Public Records. Registration Qualification. Decision Theory. Decidability. Legal Basis. |
title_short |
THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATION |
title_full |
THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATION |
title_fullStr |
THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATION |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATION |
title_sort |
THE REGISTRATOR’S DUTY TO SUBSTANCE: FOR A THEORY OF DECISION APPLICABLE TO REGISTRATION QUALIFICATION |
author |
Faria Pereira, Gustavo |
author_facet |
Faria Pereira, Gustavo Freitas Filho, Roberto Macedo de Miranda, Bartira |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas Filho, Roberto Macedo de Miranda, Bartira |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Faria Pereira, Gustavo Freitas Filho, Roberto Macedo de Miranda, Bartira |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Registros Públicos. Qualificação Registral. Teoria da Decisão. Decidibilidade. Fundamentação Jurídica. Public Records. Registration Qualification. Decision Theory. Decidability. Legal Basis. |
topic |
Registros Públicos. Qualificação Registral. Teoria da Decisão. Decidibilidade. Fundamentação Jurídica. Public Records. Registration Qualification. Decision Theory. Decidability. Legal Basis. |
description |
The registrability of documents presented to the public registry service must be checked by those who are delegates of this public service: the public registrars. The registration examination is an eminently intellectual and legal activity called registration qualification. The analysis of titles submitted for registration must comply with objective technical rules and a variety of aspects that must be considered in view of the registration claim. The public registrar’s decision, in addition to the properly legal-formal aspects of the title, covers non-registration normative aspects of economic or environmental origin, or even linked to the protection of assets of aesthetic, artistic, scenic and historical value, and to the observation of rules in federal, state and municipal laws, as well as acts of the courts' internal affairs bodies. Thus, seeing that the registration act is an activity that has become increasingly complex, this article aims to reflect on the registrar’s duty to substantiate and to be responsible for controlling, at the time of registration, the presence and compliance with the registration requirements of the titles presented to the registry office. Given this, the research’s question is: Do registrars have a duty to justify their registration qualification decisions? The aim, therefore, is to present some reflections on the registration decision, in search of a legal theory of the decision applicable to public records. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-28 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/588 10.29327/270098.15.26-6 |
url |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/588 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.29327/270098.15.26-6 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/588/448 http://esmat.tjto.jus.br/publicacoes/index.php/revista_esmat/article/view/588/493 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA ESMAT http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 REVISTA ESMAT http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
ESCOLA SUPERIOR DA MAGISTRATURA TOCANTINENSE - ESMAT |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
ESMAT Magazine; Vol. 15 No. 26 (2023); 121-138 REVISTA ESMAT; v. 15 n. 26 (2023); 121-138 2447-9896 2177-0360 reponame:Revista Esmat instname:Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) instacron:ESMAT |
instname_str |
Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
instacron_str |
ESMAT |
institution |
ESMAT |
reponame_str |
Revista Esmat |
collection |
Revista Esmat |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Esmat - Escola Superior da Magistratura Tocantinense (ESMAT) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistaesmat@tjto.jus.br |
_version_ |
1809282623739002880 |