THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICT
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2012 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo |
Texto Completo: | https://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/30 |
Resumo: | The fact typically is composed of culpable conduct, voluntary, negligent, inexpert or imprudent objetctive for ability, breach of duty care, unitended result, causal anda typicality. These elements are described and studied by the majority doctrine, expect in regard to the outcome that was relegated to the examination of a few lawyers. This requirement, since as essential, was not related to dedication. For the mainstream only exist culpable violations of naturalistic outcome. Thus was born the present essay, by the “state of the question”, based on literature search, analyzed the position of science through doctrine of Nelson Hungria, Francisco de Assis Toledo, Heleno Cláudio Fragoso, Zaffaroni e Luiz Luisi, among others. Schools as distinct criminal were brought to face the theoretical argument adopted. It was concluded that the naturalistic outcome – because the law is found in all crimes – has political function, guarantor type, integrating it. That does not preclude the provision of formal and misdemeanor culpable conduct that merelycarry on the function garantism hazard expected in the standard incriminating. In this text are examples taken form these crimes legislation homeland. For readability, we chose to indirect quotations or, alternatively, by short direct quotations. |
id |
ESMP-4_8c072c200a9dd1f3425aad835c67aa63 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30 |
network_acronym_str |
ESMP-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICTA FUNÇÃO DO RESULTADO NO DELITO CULPOSOCrime culpableElements of culpable violationsResults guiltySpeciesFunctionDelito culposoElementos da culpaResultado culposoEspéciesFunçãoThe fact typically is composed of culpable conduct, voluntary, negligent, inexpert or imprudent objetctive for ability, breach of duty care, unitended result, causal anda typicality. These elements are described and studied by the majority doctrine, expect in regard to the outcome that was relegated to the examination of a few lawyers. This requirement, since as essential, was not related to dedication. For the mainstream only exist culpable violations of naturalistic outcome. Thus was born the present essay, by the “state of the question”, based on literature search, analyzed the position of science through doctrine of Nelson Hungria, Francisco de Assis Toledo, Heleno Cláudio Fragoso, Zaffaroni e Luiz Luisi, among others. Schools as distinct criminal were brought to face the theoretical argument adopted. It was concluded that the naturalistic outcome – because the law is found in all crimes – has political function, guarantor type, integrating it. That does not preclude the provision of formal and misdemeanor culpable conduct that merelycarry on the function garantism hazard expected in the standard incriminating. In this text are examples taken form these crimes legislation homeland. For readability, we chose to indirect quotations or, alternatively, by short direct quotations.O fato típico culposo é composto de uma conduta voluntária negligente, imperita ou imprudente, previsibilidade objetiva, inobservância do dever de cuidado, resultado involuntário, nexo causal e tipicidade. Esses são os elementos descritos e estudados pela doutrina majoritária, exceto no que tange ao resultado que ficou relegado ao exame de poucos juristas. Logo, esse requisito, posto como imprescindível, ficou sem a correlata dedicação. Para a corrente dominante só existiriam infrações culposas de resultado naturalístico. Daí nasceu o presente ensaio que, pelo método “estado da questão”, baseado em pesquisa bibliográfica, analisou o posicionamento científico através dos escólios de Nélson Hungria, Francisco de Assis Toledo, Heleno Cláudio Fragoso, Zaffaroni e Luiz Luisi, dentre outros. Escolas penais tão distintas foram trazidas para fazer frente ao argumento teórico adotado. Concluiu-se que o resultado naturalístico – porque o jurídico é encontrado em todos os delitos – exerce função política, garantidora, do tipo, integrando-o. O que não impede a previsão de delito culposo formal e de mera conduta que carregam a função garantista na situação de perigo previsto na norma incriminadora. Encontram-se neste texto exemplos desses delitos tirados da legislação pátria. Para facilitar a leitura, optou-se por citações indiretas e, subsidiariamente, pelas citações diretas curtas.Setor de Pesquisa - Escola Superior do Ministério Público2012-10-25info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/30Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo; v. 1 (2012); 317-3402316-69592238-4847reponame:Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Pauloinstname:Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP)instacron:ESMPporhttps://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/30/19Pereira, Leonardo D’ Angelo Vargasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-03-06T15:54:08Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/30Revistahttps://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/indexPUBhttps://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/oaiesmp_revista@mpsp.mp.br2316-69592238-4847opendoar:2024-03-06T15:54:08Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo - Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICT A FUNÇÃO DO RESULTADO NO DELITO CULPOSO |
title |
THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICT |
spellingShingle |
THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICT Pereira, Leonardo D’ Angelo Vargas Crime culpable Elements of culpable violations Results guilty Species Function Delito culposo Elementos da culpa Resultado culposo Espécies Função |
title_short |
THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICT |
title_full |
THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICT |
title_fullStr |
THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICT |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICT |
title_sort |
THE FUNCTION OF THE RESULT IN NEGLICENCE DELICT |
author |
Pereira, Leonardo D’ Angelo Vargas |
author_facet |
Pereira, Leonardo D’ Angelo Vargas |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Leonardo D’ Angelo Vargas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Crime culpable Elements of culpable violations Results guilty Species Function Delito culposo Elementos da culpa Resultado culposo Espécies Função |
topic |
Crime culpable Elements of culpable violations Results guilty Species Function Delito culposo Elementos da culpa Resultado culposo Espécies Função |
description |
The fact typically is composed of culpable conduct, voluntary, negligent, inexpert or imprudent objetctive for ability, breach of duty care, unitended result, causal anda typicality. These elements are described and studied by the majority doctrine, expect in regard to the outcome that was relegated to the examination of a few lawyers. This requirement, since as essential, was not related to dedication. For the mainstream only exist culpable violations of naturalistic outcome. Thus was born the present essay, by the “state of the question”, based on literature search, analyzed the position of science through doctrine of Nelson Hungria, Francisco de Assis Toledo, Heleno Cláudio Fragoso, Zaffaroni e Luiz Luisi, among others. Schools as distinct criminal were brought to face the theoretical argument adopted. It was concluded that the naturalistic outcome – because the law is found in all crimes – has political function, guarantor type, integrating it. That does not preclude the provision of formal and misdemeanor culpable conduct that merelycarry on the function garantism hazard expected in the standard incriminating. In this text are examples taken form these crimes legislation homeland. For readability, we chose to indirect quotations or, alternatively, by short direct quotations. |
publishDate |
2012 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2012-10-25 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/30 |
url |
https://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/30 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://es.mpsp.mp.br/revista_esmp/index.php/RJESMPSP/article/view/30/19 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Setor de Pesquisa - Escola Superior do Ministério Público |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Setor de Pesquisa - Escola Superior do Ministério Público |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo; v. 1 (2012); 317-340 2316-6959 2238-4847 reponame:Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo instname:Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP) instacron:ESMP |
instname_str |
Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP) |
instacron_str |
ESMP |
institution |
ESMP |
reponame_str |
Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo |
collection |
Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Jurídica da Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo - Escola Superior do Ministério Público de São Paulo (ESMP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
esmp_revista@mpsp.mp.br |
_version_ |
1793890288059547648 |