ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Meneghini, Eleandra Maria Prigol
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: Lana, Jeferson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Internext
Texto Completo: https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768
Resumo: Objective: In this essay, we address the significance of aligning theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, aiming to demystify complex concepts in panel data analysis, specifically the choice between fixed and random effects. Method: Presented in an essay format with a didactic approach, we elucidate these concepts in clear and comprehensible language, rendering them accessible to a broad audience. Main Results: We emphasize the importance of theory and methodological choices, including applied statistical techniques, in panel data analysis. We examine the need for a consistent relationship between selected theory and methodology, as well as the importance of grounding intended effects in formulated hypotheses. By discussing the challenges faced by researchers who do not adequately align their theoretical and methodological choices, we seek to demonstrate that such decisions lead to inconsistent and potentially misleading results. We underscore the significance of selecting appropriate estimators that align with developed theory and proposed hypotheses. Relevance/ Originality: We hope this article serves as a valuable guide for graduate students in Administration and experienced researchers who are acquainting themselves with panel data analysis, assisting them in producing more robust and reliable research. Theoretical/ Methodological Contributions: This essay significantly contributes to the field of research in Administration by highlighting the importance of coherent alignment between theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, with a specific focus on panel data analysis and the selection between fixed and random effects.  
id ESPM-2_298562ea57eca13dda3d5e0de6fdfd8e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/768
network_acronym_str ESPM-2
network_name_str Internext
repository_id_str
spelling ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSISPENSATA: ESCOLHENDO ENTRE EFEITOS FIXOS E ALEATÓRIOS NA ANÁLISE DE DADOS EM PAINELPesquisas quantitativasEscolhas teóricasEscolhas metodológicasQuantitative researchTheoretical choicesMethodological choicesObjective: In this essay, we address the significance of aligning theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, aiming to demystify complex concepts in panel data analysis, specifically the choice between fixed and random effects. Method: Presented in an essay format with a didactic approach, we elucidate these concepts in clear and comprehensible language, rendering them accessible to a broad audience. Main Results: We emphasize the importance of theory and methodological choices, including applied statistical techniques, in panel data analysis. We examine the need for a consistent relationship between selected theory and methodology, as well as the importance of grounding intended effects in formulated hypotheses. By discussing the challenges faced by researchers who do not adequately align their theoretical and methodological choices, we seek to demonstrate that such decisions lead to inconsistent and potentially misleading results. We underscore the significance of selecting appropriate estimators that align with developed theory and proposed hypotheses. Relevance/ Originality: We hope this article serves as a valuable guide for graduate students in Administration and experienced researchers who are acquainting themselves with panel data analysis, assisting them in producing more robust and reliable research. Theoretical/ Methodological Contributions: This essay significantly contributes to the field of research in Administration by highlighting the importance of coherent alignment between theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, with a specific focus on panel data analysis and the selection between fixed and random effects.  Objetivo: Nesta pensata, abordamos a importância do alinhamento entre as escolhas teóricas e metodológicas em pesquisas quantitativas, na busca por desmistificar os conceitos complexos de análise de dados em painel, especificamente a escolha entre efeitos fixos e aleatórios. Método: Em formato de pensata e com abordagem didática, explicamos esses conceitos em linguagem clara e compreensível, tornando-os acessíveis a um público amplo. Principais Resultados: Destacamos a importância da teoria e das escolhas metodológicas, incluindo as técnicas estatísticas aplicadas, na análise de dados em painel. Examinamos a necessidade de uma relação consistente entre a teoria e a metodologia selecionadas, bem como a importância de basear os efeitos pretendidos nas hipóteses formuladas. Ao discutir os desafios enfrentados por pesquisadores que não alinham adequadamente suas escolhas teóricas e metodológicas, buscamos demonstrar que tais decisões levam a resultados inconsistentes e potencialmente enganosos. Enfatizamos a importância de selecionar estimadores apropriados que sejam consistentes com a teoria desenvolvida e as hipóteses propostas. Relevância / Originalidade: Esperamos que este artigo sirva como um guia útil para estudantes de pós-graduação em Administração e pesquisadores experientes que estão se familiarizando com a análise de dados em painel, auxiliando-os a produzir pesquisas mais robustas e confiáveis Contribuições Teóricas / Metodológicas: Esta pensata contribui de maneira significativa para o campo da pesquisa em Administração, destacando a importância do alinhamento coerente entre as escolhas teóricas e metodológicas em pesquisas quantitativas, com foco específico na análise de dados em painel e na escolha entre efeitos fixos e aleatórios.Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM2023-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/76810.18568/internext.v19i1.768Internext - International Business and Management Review ; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): Janeiro - AbrilInternext; v. 19 n. 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril1980-4865reponame:Internextinstname:Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM)instacron:ESPMporhttps://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768/502Copyright (c) 2023 Eleandra Maria Prigol Meneghini, Jeferson Lanahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMeneghini, Eleandra Maria PrigolLana, Jeferson2024-02-09T16:38:08Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/768Revistahttps://internext.espm.br/internextPRIhttps://internext.espm.br/internext/oaiinternext@espm.br1980-48651980-4865opendoar:2024-02-09T16:38:08Internext - Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS
PENSATA: ESCOLHENDO ENTRE EFEITOS FIXOS E ALEATÓRIOS NA ANÁLISE DE DADOS EM PAINEL
title ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS
spellingShingle ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS
Meneghini, Eleandra Maria Prigol
Pesquisas quantitativas
Escolhas teóricas
Escolhas metodológicas
Quantitative research
Theoretical choices
Methodological choices
title_short ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS
title_full ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS
title_fullStr ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS
title_sort ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS
author Meneghini, Eleandra Maria Prigol
author_facet Meneghini, Eleandra Maria Prigol
Lana, Jeferson
author_role author
author2 Lana, Jeferson
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Meneghini, Eleandra Maria Prigol
Lana, Jeferson
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Pesquisas quantitativas
Escolhas teóricas
Escolhas metodológicas
Quantitative research
Theoretical choices
Methodological choices
topic Pesquisas quantitativas
Escolhas teóricas
Escolhas metodológicas
Quantitative research
Theoretical choices
Methodological choices
description Objective: In this essay, we address the significance of aligning theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, aiming to demystify complex concepts in panel data analysis, specifically the choice between fixed and random effects. Method: Presented in an essay format with a didactic approach, we elucidate these concepts in clear and comprehensible language, rendering them accessible to a broad audience. Main Results: We emphasize the importance of theory and methodological choices, including applied statistical techniques, in panel data analysis. We examine the need for a consistent relationship between selected theory and methodology, as well as the importance of grounding intended effects in formulated hypotheses. By discussing the challenges faced by researchers who do not adequately align their theoretical and methodological choices, we seek to demonstrate that such decisions lead to inconsistent and potentially misleading results. We underscore the significance of selecting appropriate estimators that align with developed theory and proposed hypotheses. Relevance/ Originality: We hope this article serves as a valuable guide for graduate students in Administration and experienced researchers who are acquainting themselves with panel data analysis, assisting them in producing more robust and reliable research. Theoretical/ Methodological Contributions: This essay significantly contributes to the field of research in Administration by highlighting the importance of coherent alignment between theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, with a specific focus on panel data analysis and the selection between fixed and random effects.  
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-12-07
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768
10.18568/internext.v19i1.768
url https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768
identifier_str_mv 10.18568/internext.v19i1.768
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768/502
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Eleandra Maria Prigol Meneghini, Jeferson Lana
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Eleandra Maria Prigol Meneghini, Jeferson Lana
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Internext - International Business and Management Review ; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril
Internext; v. 19 n. 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril
1980-4865
reponame:Internext
instname:Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM)
instacron:ESPM
instname_str Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM)
instacron_str ESPM
institution ESPM
reponame_str Internext
collection Internext
repository.name.fl_str_mv Internext - Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv internext@espm.br
_version_ 1793890310448742400