ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Internext |
Texto Completo: | https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768 |
Resumo: | Objective: In this essay, we address the significance of aligning theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, aiming to demystify complex concepts in panel data analysis, specifically the choice between fixed and random effects. Method: Presented in an essay format with a didactic approach, we elucidate these concepts in clear and comprehensible language, rendering them accessible to a broad audience. Main Results: We emphasize the importance of theory and methodological choices, including applied statistical techniques, in panel data analysis. We examine the need for a consistent relationship between selected theory and methodology, as well as the importance of grounding intended effects in formulated hypotheses. By discussing the challenges faced by researchers who do not adequately align their theoretical and methodological choices, we seek to demonstrate that such decisions lead to inconsistent and potentially misleading results. We underscore the significance of selecting appropriate estimators that align with developed theory and proposed hypotheses. Relevance/ Originality: We hope this article serves as a valuable guide for graduate students in Administration and experienced researchers who are acquainting themselves with panel data analysis, assisting them in producing more robust and reliable research. Theoretical/ Methodological Contributions: This essay significantly contributes to the field of research in Administration by highlighting the importance of coherent alignment between theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, with a specific focus on panel data analysis and the selection between fixed and random effects. |
id |
ESPM-2_298562ea57eca13dda3d5e0de6fdfd8e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/768 |
network_acronym_str |
ESPM-2 |
network_name_str |
Internext |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSISPENSATA: ESCOLHENDO ENTRE EFEITOS FIXOS E ALEATÓRIOS NA ANÁLISE DE DADOS EM PAINELPesquisas quantitativasEscolhas teóricasEscolhas metodológicasQuantitative researchTheoretical choicesMethodological choicesObjective: In this essay, we address the significance of aligning theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, aiming to demystify complex concepts in panel data analysis, specifically the choice between fixed and random effects. Method: Presented in an essay format with a didactic approach, we elucidate these concepts in clear and comprehensible language, rendering them accessible to a broad audience. Main Results: We emphasize the importance of theory and methodological choices, including applied statistical techniques, in panel data analysis. We examine the need for a consistent relationship between selected theory and methodology, as well as the importance of grounding intended effects in formulated hypotheses. By discussing the challenges faced by researchers who do not adequately align their theoretical and methodological choices, we seek to demonstrate that such decisions lead to inconsistent and potentially misleading results. We underscore the significance of selecting appropriate estimators that align with developed theory and proposed hypotheses. Relevance/ Originality: We hope this article serves as a valuable guide for graduate students in Administration and experienced researchers who are acquainting themselves with panel data analysis, assisting them in producing more robust and reliable research. Theoretical/ Methodological Contributions: This essay significantly contributes to the field of research in Administration by highlighting the importance of coherent alignment between theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, with a specific focus on panel data analysis and the selection between fixed and random effects. Objetivo: Nesta pensata, abordamos a importância do alinhamento entre as escolhas teóricas e metodológicas em pesquisas quantitativas, na busca por desmistificar os conceitos complexos de análise de dados em painel, especificamente a escolha entre efeitos fixos e aleatórios. Método: Em formato de pensata e com abordagem didática, explicamos esses conceitos em linguagem clara e compreensível, tornando-os acessíveis a um público amplo. Principais Resultados: Destacamos a importância da teoria e das escolhas metodológicas, incluindo as técnicas estatísticas aplicadas, na análise de dados em painel. Examinamos a necessidade de uma relação consistente entre a teoria e a metodologia selecionadas, bem como a importância de basear os efeitos pretendidos nas hipóteses formuladas. Ao discutir os desafios enfrentados por pesquisadores que não alinham adequadamente suas escolhas teóricas e metodológicas, buscamos demonstrar que tais decisões levam a resultados inconsistentes e potencialmente enganosos. Enfatizamos a importância de selecionar estimadores apropriados que sejam consistentes com a teoria desenvolvida e as hipóteses propostas. Relevância / Originalidade: Esperamos que este artigo sirva como um guia útil para estudantes de pós-graduação em Administração e pesquisadores experientes que estão se familiarizando com a análise de dados em painel, auxiliando-os a produzir pesquisas mais robustas e confiáveis Contribuições Teóricas / Metodológicas: Esta pensata contribui de maneira significativa para o campo da pesquisa em Administração, destacando a importância do alinhamento coerente entre as escolhas teóricas e metodológicas em pesquisas quantitativas, com foco específico na análise de dados em painel e na escolha entre efeitos fixos e aleatórios.Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM2023-12-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/76810.18568/internext.v19i1.768Internext - International Business and Management Review ; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): Janeiro - AbrilInternext; v. 19 n. 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril1980-4865reponame:Internextinstname:Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM)instacron:ESPMporhttps://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768/502Copyright (c) 2023 Eleandra Maria Prigol Meneghini, Jeferson Lanahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMeneghini, Eleandra Maria PrigolLana, Jeferson2024-02-09T16:38:08Zoai:ojs.emnuvens.com.br:article/768Revistahttps://internext.espm.br/internextPRIhttps://internext.espm.br/internext/oaiinternext@espm.br1980-48651980-4865opendoar:2024-02-09T16:38:08Internext - Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS PENSATA: ESCOLHENDO ENTRE EFEITOS FIXOS E ALEATÓRIOS NA ANÁLISE DE DADOS EM PAINEL |
title |
ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS |
spellingShingle |
ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS Meneghini, Eleandra Maria Prigol Pesquisas quantitativas Escolhas teóricas Escolhas metodológicas Quantitative research Theoretical choices Methodological choices |
title_short |
ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS |
title_full |
ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS |
title_fullStr |
ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS |
title_full_unstemmed |
ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS |
title_sort |
ESSAY: CHOOSING BETWEEN FIXED AND RANDOM EFFECTS IN PANEL DATA ANALYSIS |
author |
Meneghini, Eleandra Maria Prigol |
author_facet |
Meneghini, Eleandra Maria Prigol Lana, Jeferson |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lana, Jeferson |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Meneghini, Eleandra Maria Prigol Lana, Jeferson |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Pesquisas quantitativas Escolhas teóricas Escolhas metodológicas Quantitative research Theoretical choices Methodological choices |
topic |
Pesquisas quantitativas Escolhas teóricas Escolhas metodológicas Quantitative research Theoretical choices Methodological choices |
description |
Objective: In this essay, we address the significance of aligning theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, aiming to demystify complex concepts in panel data analysis, specifically the choice between fixed and random effects. Method: Presented in an essay format with a didactic approach, we elucidate these concepts in clear and comprehensible language, rendering them accessible to a broad audience. Main Results: We emphasize the importance of theory and methodological choices, including applied statistical techniques, in panel data analysis. We examine the need for a consistent relationship between selected theory and methodology, as well as the importance of grounding intended effects in formulated hypotheses. By discussing the challenges faced by researchers who do not adequately align their theoretical and methodological choices, we seek to demonstrate that such decisions lead to inconsistent and potentially misleading results. We underscore the significance of selecting appropriate estimators that align with developed theory and proposed hypotheses. Relevance/ Originality: We hope this article serves as a valuable guide for graduate students in Administration and experienced researchers who are acquainting themselves with panel data analysis, assisting them in producing more robust and reliable research. Theoretical/ Methodological Contributions: This essay significantly contributes to the field of research in Administration by highlighting the importance of coherent alignment between theoretical and methodological choices in quantitative research, with a specific focus on panel data analysis and the selection between fixed and random effects. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-12-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768 10.18568/internext.v19i1.768 |
url |
https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.18568/internext.v19i1.768 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://internext.espm.br/internext/article/view/768/502 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Eleandra Maria Prigol Meneghini, Jeferson Lana http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2023 Eleandra Maria Prigol Meneghini, Jeferson Lana http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing - ESPM |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Internext - International Business and Management Review ; Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril Internext; v. 19 n. 1 (2024): Janeiro - Abril 1980-4865 reponame:Internext instname:Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM) instacron:ESPM |
instname_str |
Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM) |
instacron_str |
ESPM |
institution |
ESPM |
reponame_str |
Internext |
collection |
Internext |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Internext - Escola Superior de Propaganda e Marketing (ESPM) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
internext@espm.br |
_version_ |
1793890310448742400 |