Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
DOI: | 10.54448/mdnt23S101 |
Texto Completo: | https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/245 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The importance of knowing the constitution of this epithelium is because these hair cells play a fundamental role in the physiology of the maxillary sinus. When a dental element is lost in the posterior region of the maxilla, there is natural reabsorption of the alveolar process and, at the same time, pneumatization of the maxillary sinus will occur. Objective: It was to demonstrate, through a systematic review, the main clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from September to October 2022 in Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. A total of 110 articles were found, 41 articles were evaluated and 31 were included in this systematic review. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 31 studies at high risk of bias and 25 studies that did not meet the GRADE. Most studies showed homogeneity in their results, with I2 =98.9% >50%. Results and Conclusion: It was found that the search for a solution to large bone defects guided the studies for regeneration therapy tissue or bone regeneration. These studies can promote the use of fillers and epithelial barriers that help in the treatment as an adjuvant to bone graft techniques, favoring greater predictability in alveolar and peri-implant reconstructions and with a good prognosis. The main filler biomaterials can be fibrin-rich plasma (FRP), Bio-Oss®. It is necessary to understand the chemical, physical and biological processes of both the biological material and the biological niche of the host. Crossing compatible information between microenvironments allows cell recognition and signaling cascades for neovascularization and regeneration and bone filling. |
id |
FACERES-1_8667d1ff9b497d70fab352b1376e2a8f |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/245 |
network_acronym_str |
FACERES-1 |
network_name_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
spelling |
Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic reviewMaxillofacial surgeryCell regulationBone regenerationBiomaterialsIntroduction: The importance of knowing the constitution of this epithelium is because these hair cells play a fundamental role in the physiology of the maxillary sinus. When a dental element is lost in the posterior region of the maxilla, there is natural reabsorption of the alveolar process and, at the same time, pneumatization of the maxillary sinus will occur. Objective: It was to demonstrate, through a systematic review, the main clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from September to October 2022 in Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. A total of 110 articles were found, 41 articles were evaluated and 31 were included in this systematic review. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 31 studies at high risk of bias and 25 studies that did not meet the GRADE. Most studies showed homogeneity in their results, with I2 =98.9% >50%. Results and Conclusion: It was found that the search for a solution to large bone defects guided the studies for regeneration therapy tissue or bone regeneration. These studies can promote the use of fillers and epithelial barriers that help in the treatment as an adjuvant to bone graft techniques, favoring greater predictability in alveolar and peri-implant reconstructions and with a good prognosis. The main filler biomaterials can be fibrin-rich plasma (FRP), Bio-Oss®. It is necessary to understand the chemical, physical and biological processes of both the biological material and the biological niche of the host. Crossing compatible information between microenvironments allows cell recognition and signaling cascades for neovascularization and regeneration and bone filling.MetaScience Press2023-01-02info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/24510.54448/mdnt23S101MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 4 No. S1 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 1 - February 2023MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 4 n. S1 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 1 - February 20232763-567810.54448/mdnt23S1reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/245/233Copyright (c) 2023 Bruna Maria Vital dos Anjos, Leandro Gotardello Alves, Fabio Alarcon Idalgo, Silvio Antonio dos Santos Pereira, Alexandre Gomes Nunes, Elias Naim Kassis, Alvaro José Cicareli, Igor Mariotto Benetihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAnjos, Bruna Maria Vital dosAlves, Leandro GotardelloIdalgo, Fabio AlarconPereira, Silvio Antonio dos SantosNunes, Alexandre GomesKassis, Elias NaimCicareli, Alvaro JoséBeneti, Igor Mariotto2024-01-23T15:25:15Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/245Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2024-01-23T15:25:15MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review |
title |
Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review Anjos, Bruna Maria Vital dos Maxillofacial surgery Cell regulation Bone regeneration Biomaterials Anjos, Bruna Maria Vital dos Maxillofacial surgery Cell regulation Bone regeneration Biomaterials |
title_short |
Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review |
title_full |
Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Major clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration: a systematic review |
author |
Anjos, Bruna Maria Vital dos |
author_facet |
Anjos, Bruna Maria Vital dos Anjos, Bruna Maria Vital dos Alves, Leandro Gotardello Idalgo, Fabio Alarcon Pereira, Silvio Antonio dos Santos Nunes, Alexandre Gomes Kassis, Elias Naim Cicareli, Alvaro José Beneti, Igor Mariotto Alves, Leandro Gotardello Idalgo, Fabio Alarcon Pereira, Silvio Antonio dos Santos Nunes, Alexandre Gomes Kassis, Elias Naim Cicareli, Alvaro José Beneti, Igor Mariotto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Alves, Leandro Gotardello Idalgo, Fabio Alarcon Pereira, Silvio Antonio dos Santos Nunes, Alexandre Gomes Kassis, Elias Naim Cicareli, Alvaro José Beneti, Igor Mariotto |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Anjos, Bruna Maria Vital dos Alves, Leandro Gotardello Idalgo, Fabio Alarcon Pereira, Silvio Antonio dos Santos Nunes, Alexandre Gomes Kassis, Elias Naim Cicareli, Alvaro José Beneti, Igor Mariotto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Maxillofacial surgery Cell regulation Bone regeneration Biomaterials |
topic |
Maxillofacial surgery Cell regulation Bone regeneration Biomaterials |
description |
Introduction: The importance of knowing the constitution of this epithelium is because these hair cells play a fundamental role in the physiology of the maxillary sinus. When a dental element is lost in the posterior region of the maxilla, there is natural reabsorption of the alveolar process and, at the same time, pneumatization of the maxillary sinus will occur. Objective: It was to demonstrate, through a systematic review, the main clinical outcomes of cellular and molecular regulation in maxillofacial bone regeneration. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The research was carried out from September to October 2022 in Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases. The quality of the studies was based on the GRADE instrument and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the Cochrane instrument. A total of 110 articles were found, 41 articles were evaluated and 31 were included in this systematic review. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 31 studies at high risk of bias and 25 studies that did not meet the GRADE. Most studies showed homogeneity in their results, with I2 =98.9% >50%. Results and Conclusion: It was found that the search for a solution to large bone defects guided the studies for regeneration therapy tissue or bone regeneration. These studies can promote the use of fillers and epithelial barriers that help in the treatment as an adjuvant to bone graft techniques, favoring greater predictability in alveolar and peri-implant reconstructions and with a good prognosis. The main filler biomaterials can be fibrin-rich plasma (FRP), Bio-Oss®. It is necessary to understand the chemical, physical and biological processes of both the biological material and the biological niche of the host. Crossing compatible information between microenvironments allows cell recognition and signaling cascades for neovascularization and regeneration and bone filling. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-01-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/245 10.54448/mdnt23S101 |
url |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/245 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.54448/mdnt23S101 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/245/233 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MetaScience Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MetaScience Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 4 No. S1 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 1 - February 2023 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 4 n. S1 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 1 - February 2023 2763-5678 10.54448/mdnt23S1 reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) instacron:FACERES |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
instacron_str |
FACERES |
institution |
FACERES |
reponame_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
collection |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com |
_version_ |
1822181997974388736 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.54448/mdnt23S101 |