Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
Texto Completo: | https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308 |
Resumo: | Introduction: The rehabilitation of the dental arch with osseointegrated implants makes it possible to improve the quality of life of patients. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been applied to replace lost bone to allow the implant to be fully integrated and maintained during functional loading. GBR is considered one of the most commonly applied methods to reconstruct alveolar bone and to treat peri-implant bone deficiencies. Objective: It was to develop a systematic review to highlight the main approaches of guided surgery to promote bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The search was carried out from March to May 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases, using articles from 1977 (Golden pattern - Bra°nemark et al. ) to 2023. Results and Conclusion: A total of 117 articles were found, 38 articles were evaluated and 28 were included and developed in this systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 15 studies that did not meet GRADE. It was concluded that the application of a membrane to prevent nonosteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a fundamental principle. Membrane properties and biological outcomes drive bone regeneration in membrane-covered defects. Barrier membranes play the role of preventing the invasion of soft tissue by exiting the mucosa and creating an underlying space to support bone growth. Collagen membranes have excellent biological properties and bone regeneration results. While collagen membranes do not provide sufficient mechanical protection of the covered bone defect, titanium-reinforced membranes, and non-resorbable membranes need to be removed in a second surgery. |
id |
FACERES-1_d0c7dce5b2d16613854e7a1857ea0dc7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/308 |
network_acronym_str |
FACERES-1 |
network_name_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic reviewBone regenerationGuided bone regenerationImplant dentistryBiomaterials. MembranesIntroduction: The rehabilitation of the dental arch with osseointegrated implants makes it possible to improve the quality of life of patients. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been applied to replace lost bone to allow the implant to be fully integrated and maintained during functional loading. GBR is considered one of the most commonly applied methods to reconstruct alveolar bone and to treat peri-implant bone deficiencies. Objective: It was to develop a systematic review to highlight the main approaches of guided surgery to promote bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The search was carried out from March to May 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases, using articles from 1977 (Golden pattern - Bra°nemark et al. ) to 2023. Results and Conclusion: A total of 117 articles were found, 38 articles were evaluated and 28 were included and developed in this systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 15 studies that did not meet GRADE. It was concluded that the application of a membrane to prevent nonosteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a fundamental principle. Membrane properties and biological outcomes drive bone regeneration in membrane-covered defects. Barrier membranes play the role of preventing the invasion of soft tissue by exiting the mucosa and creating an underlying space to support bone growth. Collagen membranes have excellent biological properties and bone regeneration results. While collagen membranes do not provide sufficient mechanical protection of the covered bone defect, titanium-reinforced membranes, and non-resorbable membranes need to be removed in a second surgery.MetaScience Press2023-07-12info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/otherapplication/pdfhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/30810.54448/mdnt23S221MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 4 No. S2 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 2 - March 2023MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 4 n. S2 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 2 - March 20232763-567810.54448/mdnt23S2reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciencesinstname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)instacron:FACERESenghttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308/293Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Eduarda Tamura Esteves, Ruana Molina Garcia Bianchini, João Pedro Pereira Gonzatti, Andreia Borges Scribonihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEsteves, Maria Eduarda TamuraBianchini, Ruana Molina GarciaGonzatti, João Pedro PereiraScriboni, Andreia Borges2024-01-23T15:24:19Zoai:ojs2.mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com:article/308Revistahttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednextPUBhttps://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/oaimednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com2763-56782763-5678opendoar:2024-01-23T15:24:19MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review |
title |
Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review Esteves, Maria Eduarda Tamura Bone regeneration Guided bone regeneration Implant dentistry Biomaterials. Membranes |
title_short |
Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review |
title_full |
Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry: a systematic review |
author |
Esteves, Maria Eduarda Tamura |
author_facet |
Esteves, Maria Eduarda Tamura Bianchini, Ruana Molina Garcia Gonzatti, João Pedro Pereira Scriboni, Andreia Borges |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bianchini, Ruana Molina Garcia Gonzatti, João Pedro Pereira Scriboni, Andreia Borges |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Esteves, Maria Eduarda Tamura Bianchini, Ruana Molina Garcia Gonzatti, João Pedro Pereira Scriboni, Andreia Borges |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Bone regeneration Guided bone regeneration Implant dentistry Biomaterials. Membranes |
topic |
Bone regeneration Guided bone regeneration Implant dentistry Biomaterials. Membranes |
description |
Introduction: The rehabilitation of the dental arch with osseointegrated implants makes it possible to improve the quality of life of patients. Guided bone regeneration (GBR) has been applied to replace lost bone to allow the implant to be fully integrated and maintained during functional loading. GBR is considered one of the most commonly applied methods to reconstruct alveolar bone and to treat peri-implant bone deficiencies. Objective: It was to develop a systematic review to highlight the main approaches of guided surgery to promote bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Methods: The systematic review rules of the PRISMA Platform were followed. The search was carried out from March to May 2023 in the Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct, Scielo, and Google Scholar databases, using articles from 1977 (Golden pattern - Bra°nemark et al. ) to 2023. Results and Conclusion: A total of 117 articles were found, 38 articles were evaluated and 28 were included and developed in this systematic review study. Considering the Cochrane tool for risk of bias, the overall assessment resulted in 22 studies with a high risk of bias and 15 studies that did not meet GRADE. It was concluded that the application of a membrane to prevent nonosteogenic tissues from interfering with bone regeneration is a fundamental principle. Membrane properties and biological outcomes drive bone regeneration in membrane-covered defects. Barrier membranes play the role of preventing the invasion of soft tissue by exiting the mucosa and creating an underlying space to support bone growth. Collagen membranes have excellent biological properties and bone regeneration results. While collagen membranes do not provide sufficient mechanical protection of the covered bone defect, titanium-reinforced membranes, and non-resorbable membranes need to be removed in a second surgery. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-07-12 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion info:eu-repo/semantics/other |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308 10.54448/mdnt23S221 |
url |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.54448/mdnt23S221 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://mednext.zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com/index.php/mednext/article/view/308/293 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MetaScience Press |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MetaScience Press |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; Vol. 4 No. S2 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 2 - March 2023 MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences; v. 4 n. S2 (2023): MedNEXT - Supplement 2 - March 2023 2763-5678 10.54448/mdnt23S2 reponame:MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences instname:Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) instacron:FACERES |
instname_str |
Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
instacron_str |
FACERES |
institution |
FACERES |
reponame_str |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
collection |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
MedNEXT Journal of Medical and Health Sciences - Faculdade de Medicina em São José do Rio Preto (Faceres) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mednextjmhs@zotarellifilhoscientificworks.com |
_version_ |
1796798218273554432 |