Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learning
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/2873 |
Resumo: | This study, in the human sciences area, aims to verify if authors of abstracts attempt, in their texts, to understand the features of this discursive genre and if they show self-regulated ability to do so. First, twenty-four abstracts written by master degree students of a federal university were analyzed. In order to better express the results, an instrument of analysis and quantitative considerations was construed. From the twenty-four abstracts analyzed, five were considered compatible with a written production, as they expressed semantic properties of reading and discursive organization; thirteen abstracts did not present the expected features; and, the other six had serious problems, such as plagiarizing the original work. These analyzes were based on the construct of self-regulation of learning and discursive linguistic theories. |
id |
FCC-1_517c3fd9dfe498eb0c0a7db4093f0665 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/2873 |
network_acronym_str |
FCC-1 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learningEscritura de resúmenes y estrategias de autorregulación del aprendizajeEscrita de resumos e estratégias de autorregulação da aprendizagemLeituraEscritaAutorregulaçãoResumosEscrita de resumosReadingWritingSelf-RegulationSummariesLecturaEscrituraAutorregulaciónResúmenesThis study, in the human sciences area, aims to verify if authors of abstracts attempt, in their texts, to understand the features of this discursive genre and if they show self-regulated ability to do so. First, twenty-four abstracts written by master degree students of a federal university were analyzed. In order to better express the results, an instrument of analysis and quantitative considerations was construed. From the twenty-four abstracts analyzed, five were considered compatible with a written production, as they expressed semantic properties of reading and discursive organization; thirteen abstracts did not present the expected features; and, the other six had serious problems, such as plagiarizing the original work. These analyzes were based on the construct of self-regulation of learning and discursive linguistic theories.Con este estudio, que se sitúa en la articulación de áreas de las ciencias humanas, se pretende verificar si autores de resúmenes ponen de manifiesto en sus textos si conocen o no las características de tal género discursivo y si muestran competencia autorregulada al hacerlo. En primer lugar se analizaron 24 resúmenes, realizados por candidatos a la maestría de una institución educativa federal. Para ello se construyó un instrumento de análisis e de ponderaciones cuantitativas, a fin de tratar de expresar mejor los resultados. Entre los 24 resúmenes analizados, cinco fueron considerados compatibles con una producción escrita, porque expresaban semánticamente propiedades de lectura y de organización discursiva; 13 no presentaron las propiedades esperadas; otros seis manifestaron problemas graves, como copia del trabajo original. Los análisis contaron con el soporte del constructo de autorregulación del aprendizaje e de teorías lingüísticas discursivas. Com este estudo, que se situa na articulação de áreas das ciências humanas, quer-se verificar se autores de resumos evidenciam em seus textos conhecer as características desse gênero discursivo e se mostram competência autorregulada ao fazê-lo. Primeiramente, foram analisados 24 resumos, realizados por candidatos ao mestrado de uma instituição de ensino federal. Para isso, construiu-se um instrumento de análise e de ponderações quantitativas, procurando melhor expressar os resultados. Dos 24 resumos analisados, cinco foram considerados compatíveis com uma produção escrita, por expressarem semanticamente propriedades de leitura e de organização discursiva; 13 não apresentaram as propriedades esperadas; outros seis apresentaram problemas graves, como cópia do trabalho original. As análises foram alicerçadas pelo construto da autorregulação da aprendizagem e por teorias linguísticas discursivas.Fundação Carlos Chagas2015-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/2873Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 No. 155: jan./mar.2015; 30-55Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 Núm. 155: jan./mar.2015; 30-55Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 No. 155: jan./mar.2015; 30-55Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 45 n. 155: jan./mar.2015; 30-551980-53140100-1574reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online)instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)instacron:FCCporhttps://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/2873/2866Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos de Pesquisahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVeiga-Simão, Ana MargaridaFrison, Lourdes Maria BragagnoloMachado, Rejane Flor2022-12-09T13:51:21Zoai:ojs.publicacoes.fcc.org.br:article/2873Revistahttp://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/ojs/index.php/cp/indexhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br1980-53140100-1574opendoar:2022-12-09T13:51:21Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learning Escritura de resúmenes y estrategias de autorregulación del aprendizaje Escrita de resumos e estratégias de autorregulação da aprendizagem |
title |
Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learning |
spellingShingle |
Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learning Veiga-Simão, Ana Margarida Leitura Escrita Autorregulação Resumos Escrita de resumos Reading Writing Self-Regulation Summaries Lectura Escritura Autorregulación Resúmenes |
title_short |
Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learning |
title_full |
Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learning |
title_fullStr |
Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learning |
title_sort |
Writing summaries and strategies of self-regulation of learning |
author |
Veiga-Simão, Ana Margarida |
author_facet |
Veiga-Simão, Ana Margarida Frison, Lourdes Maria Bragagnolo Machado, Rejane Flor |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Frison, Lourdes Maria Bragagnolo Machado, Rejane Flor |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Veiga-Simão, Ana Margarida Frison, Lourdes Maria Bragagnolo Machado, Rejane Flor |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Leitura Escrita Autorregulação Resumos Escrita de resumos Reading Writing Self-Regulation Summaries Lectura Escritura Autorregulación Resúmenes |
topic |
Leitura Escrita Autorregulação Resumos Escrita de resumos Reading Writing Self-Regulation Summaries Lectura Escritura Autorregulación Resúmenes |
description |
This study, in the human sciences area, aims to verify if authors of abstracts attempt, in their texts, to understand the features of this discursive genre and if they show self-regulated ability to do so. First, twenty-four abstracts written by master degree students of a federal university were analyzed. In order to better express the results, an instrument of analysis and quantitative considerations was construed. From the twenty-four abstracts analyzed, five were considered compatible with a written production, as they expressed semantic properties of reading and discursive organization; thirteen abstracts did not present the expected features; and, the other six had serious problems, such as plagiarizing the original work. These analyzes were based on the construct of self-regulation of learning and discursive linguistic theories. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-03-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/2873 |
url |
https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/2873 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://publicacoes.fcc.org.br/cp/article/view/2873/2866 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos de Pesquisa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Cadernos de Pesquisa https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Carlos Chagas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Carlos Chagas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 No. 155: jan./mar.2015; 30-55 Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 Núm. 155: jan./mar.2015; 30-55 Cadernos de Pesquisa; Vol. 45 No. 155: jan./mar.2015; 30-55 Cadernos de Pesquisa; v. 45 n. 155: jan./mar.2015; 30-55 1980-5314 0100-1574 reponame:Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) instname:Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC) instacron:FCC |
instname_str |
Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC) |
instacron_str |
FCC |
institution |
FCC |
reponame_str |
Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) |
collection |
Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos de Pesquisa (Fundação Carlos Chagas. Online) - Fundação Carlos Chagas (FCC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadpesq@fcc.org.br||cadpesq@fcc.org.br |
_version_ |
1795330314818551808 |