Hermeneutics and the human sciences

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Soares, Luiz Eduardo
Data de Publicação: 1988
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932
Resumo: The author of this article seeks to situate the hermeneutic tradition and the outlook of Hans-George Gadamer in particular, in the light of certain strategic dilemmas in the human sciences which, in the author's opinion, involve a common question: the status assigned to uniqueness. Recognition of the importance and the persistence of this problem permits the distinction of three particularly significant positions, tributaries of the Enlightenment and of romanticism. Hermeneutics, as it is understood in the essay, represents the neo-romantic position, characterized by the attribution of pertinence to difference in its irreducible aspect. Yet, unlike what is known as the "philosophy of difference", it does not reject Hegelian inspiration in the appropriation of Heidegger's legacy. The author tries to demonstrate that the triangular framework resulting from the viewpoint chosen as the ordering focal point (the question of uniqueness) is productive - though, of course, not the only one possible - because it sheds light on decisive facets to contemporary debates. He points to the privileged role that the hermeneutic tradition could play in the progression of the controversy, which is of necessity defined as incomplete.
id FGV-10_0a45c69d6b067dc524da886214654f5e
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/1932
network_acronym_str FGV-10
network_name_str Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro)
repository_id_str
spelling Hermeneutics and the human sciencesHermenêutica e ciências humanasThe author of this article seeks to situate the hermeneutic tradition and the outlook of Hans-George Gadamer in particular, in the light of certain strategic dilemmas in the human sciences which, in the author's opinion, involve a common question: the status assigned to uniqueness. Recognition of the importance and the persistence of this problem permits the distinction of three particularly significant positions, tributaries of the Enlightenment and of romanticism. Hermeneutics, as it is understood in the essay, represents the neo-romantic position, characterized by the attribution of pertinence to difference in its irreducible aspect. Yet, unlike what is known as the "philosophy of difference", it does not reject Hegelian inspiration in the appropriation of Heidegger's legacy. The author tries to demonstrate that the triangular framework resulting from the viewpoint chosen as the ordering focal point (the question of uniqueness) is productive - though, of course, not the only one possible - because it sheds light on decisive facets to contemporary debates. He points to the privileged role that the hermeneutic tradition could play in the progression of the controversy, which is of necessity defined as incomplete.O autor busca situar a tradição hermenêutica e a visão de Hans-George Gadamer, em particular, à luz de certos dilemas estratégicos nas ciências humanas que, em sua visão, envolvem uma questão comum: o status atribuído à singularidade. O reconhecimento da relevância e persistência desta questão permitem a distinção entre três posições particularmente significativas, tributárias do Iluminismo e do Romantismo. A hermenêutica, como entendida no artigo, representa uma posição neo-romântica, caracterizada pela pertinência atribuída à diferença naquilo que tem de irredutível. Ainda assim, contrariamente ao que se convencionou chamar de ¿filosofia da diferença¿, ela não rejeita a inspiração hegeliana tal como apropriada por Heidegger. O autor tenta demonstrar que a representação triangular resultante do ponto de vista adotado como ponto de partida (a questão da singularidade) é produtiva - apesar de, é claro, não ser a única possível - pois lança sua luz sobre aspectos decisivos para o debate contemporâneo. O autor aponta o papel privilegiado que a tradição da hermenêutica poderia representar na progressão da controvérsia, que é por definição incompleta.Editora FGV1988-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932Revista Estudos Históricos; Vol. 1 No. 1 (1988): Paths of Historiography; 100-142Revista Estudos Históricos; v. 1 n. 1 (1988): Caminhos da Historiografia; 100-1422178-14940103-2186reponame:Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932/1071Soares, Luiz Eduardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-08-17T18:56:30Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/1932Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rehONGhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/oai||biblioteca.digital@fgv.br||eh@fgv.br2178-14940103-2186opendoar:2024-03-06T13:01:26.485822Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hermeneutics and the human sciences
Hermenêutica e ciências humanas
title Hermeneutics and the human sciences
spellingShingle Hermeneutics and the human sciences
Soares, Luiz Eduardo
title_short Hermeneutics and the human sciences
title_full Hermeneutics and the human sciences
title_fullStr Hermeneutics and the human sciences
title_full_unstemmed Hermeneutics and the human sciences
title_sort Hermeneutics and the human sciences
author Soares, Luiz Eduardo
author_facet Soares, Luiz Eduardo
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Soares, Luiz Eduardo
description The author of this article seeks to situate the hermeneutic tradition and the outlook of Hans-George Gadamer in particular, in the light of certain strategic dilemmas in the human sciences which, in the author's opinion, involve a common question: the status assigned to uniqueness. Recognition of the importance and the persistence of this problem permits the distinction of three particularly significant positions, tributaries of the Enlightenment and of romanticism. Hermeneutics, as it is understood in the essay, represents the neo-romantic position, characterized by the attribution of pertinence to difference in its irreducible aspect. Yet, unlike what is known as the "philosophy of difference", it does not reject Hegelian inspiration in the appropriation of Heidegger's legacy. The author tries to demonstrate that the triangular framework resulting from the viewpoint chosen as the ordering focal point (the question of uniqueness) is productive - though, of course, not the only one possible - because it sheds light on decisive facets to contemporary debates. He points to the privileged role that the hermeneutic tradition could play in the progression of the controversy, which is of necessity defined as incomplete.
publishDate 1988
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 1988-01-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932/1071
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora FGV
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editora FGV
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Estudos Históricos; Vol. 1 No. 1 (1988): Paths of Historiography; 100-142
Revista Estudos Históricos; v. 1 n. 1 (1988): Caminhos da Historiografia; 100-142
2178-1494
0103-2186
reponame:Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro)
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro)
collection Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||biblioteca.digital@fgv.br||eh@fgv.br
_version_ 1798942524474130433