Hermeneutics and the human sciences
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 1988 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932 |
Resumo: | The author of this article seeks to situate the hermeneutic tradition and the outlook of Hans-George Gadamer in particular, in the light of certain strategic dilemmas in the human sciences which, in the author's opinion, involve a common question: the status assigned to uniqueness. Recognition of the importance and the persistence of this problem permits the distinction of three particularly significant positions, tributaries of the Enlightenment and of romanticism. Hermeneutics, as it is understood in the essay, represents the neo-romantic position, characterized by the attribution of pertinence to difference in its irreducible aspect. Yet, unlike what is known as the "philosophy of difference", it does not reject Hegelian inspiration in the appropriation of Heidegger's legacy. The author tries to demonstrate that the triangular framework resulting from the viewpoint chosen as the ordering focal point (the question of uniqueness) is productive - though, of course, not the only one possible - because it sheds light on decisive facets to contemporary debates. He points to the privileged role that the hermeneutic tradition could play in the progression of the controversy, which is of necessity defined as incomplete. |
id |
FGV-10_0a45c69d6b067dc524da886214654f5e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/1932 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-10 |
network_name_str |
Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Hermeneutics and the human sciencesHermenêutica e ciências humanasThe author of this article seeks to situate the hermeneutic tradition and the outlook of Hans-George Gadamer in particular, in the light of certain strategic dilemmas in the human sciences which, in the author's opinion, involve a common question: the status assigned to uniqueness. Recognition of the importance and the persistence of this problem permits the distinction of three particularly significant positions, tributaries of the Enlightenment and of romanticism. Hermeneutics, as it is understood in the essay, represents the neo-romantic position, characterized by the attribution of pertinence to difference in its irreducible aspect. Yet, unlike what is known as the "philosophy of difference", it does not reject Hegelian inspiration in the appropriation of Heidegger's legacy. The author tries to demonstrate that the triangular framework resulting from the viewpoint chosen as the ordering focal point (the question of uniqueness) is productive - though, of course, not the only one possible - because it sheds light on decisive facets to contemporary debates. He points to the privileged role that the hermeneutic tradition could play in the progression of the controversy, which is of necessity defined as incomplete.O autor busca situar a tradição hermenêutica e a visão de Hans-George Gadamer, em particular, à luz de certos dilemas estratégicos nas ciências humanas que, em sua visão, envolvem uma questão comum: o status atribuído à singularidade. O reconhecimento da relevância e persistência desta questão permitem a distinção entre três posições particularmente significativas, tributárias do Iluminismo e do Romantismo. A hermenêutica, como entendida no artigo, representa uma posição neo-romântica, caracterizada pela pertinência atribuída à diferença naquilo que tem de irredutível. Ainda assim, contrariamente ao que se convencionou chamar de ¿filosofia da diferença¿, ela não rejeita a inspiração hegeliana tal como apropriada por Heidegger. O autor tenta demonstrar que a representação triangular resultante do ponto de vista adotado como ponto de partida (a questão da singularidade) é produtiva - apesar de, é claro, não ser a única possível - pois lança sua luz sobre aspectos decisivos para o debate contemporâneo. O autor aponta o papel privilegiado que a tradição da hermenêutica poderia representar na progressão da controvérsia, que é por definição incompleta.Editora FGV1988-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932Revista Estudos Históricos; Vol. 1 No. 1 (1988): Paths of Historiography; 100-142Revista Estudos Históricos; v. 1 n. 1 (1988): Caminhos da Historiografia; 100-1422178-14940103-2186reponame:Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932/1071Soares, Luiz Eduardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-08-17T18:56:30Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/1932Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rehONGhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/oai||biblioteca.digital@fgv.br||eh@fgv.br2178-14940103-2186opendoar:2024-03-06T13:01:26.485822Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Hermeneutics and the human sciences Hermenêutica e ciências humanas |
title |
Hermeneutics and the human sciences |
spellingShingle |
Hermeneutics and the human sciences Soares, Luiz Eduardo |
title_short |
Hermeneutics and the human sciences |
title_full |
Hermeneutics and the human sciences |
title_fullStr |
Hermeneutics and the human sciences |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hermeneutics and the human sciences |
title_sort |
Hermeneutics and the human sciences |
author |
Soares, Luiz Eduardo |
author_facet |
Soares, Luiz Eduardo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Soares, Luiz Eduardo |
description |
The author of this article seeks to situate the hermeneutic tradition and the outlook of Hans-George Gadamer in particular, in the light of certain strategic dilemmas in the human sciences which, in the author's opinion, involve a common question: the status assigned to uniqueness. Recognition of the importance and the persistence of this problem permits the distinction of three particularly significant positions, tributaries of the Enlightenment and of romanticism. Hermeneutics, as it is understood in the essay, represents the neo-romantic position, characterized by the attribution of pertinence to difference in its irreducible aspect. Yet, unlike what is known as the "philosophy of difference", it does not reject Hegelian inspiration in the appropriation of Heidegger's legacy. The author tries to demonstrate that the triangular framework resulting from the viewpoint chosen as the ordering focal point (the question of uniqueness) is productive - though, of course, not the only one possible - because it sheds light on decisive facets to contemporary debates. He points to the privileged role that the hermeneutic tradition could play in the progression of the controversy, which is of necessity defined as incomplete. |
publishDate |
1988 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
1988-01-30 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/1932/1071 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora FGV |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Editora FGV |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Estudos Históricos; Vol. 1 No. 1 (1988): Paths of Historiography; 100-142 Revista Estudos Históricos; v. 1 n. 1 (1988): Caminhos da Historiografia; 100-142 2178-1494 0103-2186 reponame:Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) |
collection |
Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Estudos Históricos (Rio de Janeiro) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||biblioteca.digital@fgv.br||eh@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798942524474130433 |