China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608 |
Resumo: | The purpose of this paper is to analyze the recognition of China as a market economy in the context of the Brazilian investigations into trade remedies after 2016 when a clause of China’s protocol of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) expired. Although the interpretation of the Brazilian authority is now clear (a caseby- case evaluation of the sectors under analysis), some aspects of these applications should be further discussed. Among those aspects are the (in)adequate procedural time to address whether China is a market economy, the consequences of the absence of participation by Chinese exporters in these investigations, and the legal uncertainty as to the information that should be considered in the investigation. Finally, the research will provide an empirical analysis on the impact that a counterfactual and unrestricted recognition of China as a market economy might have on current anti-dumping duties currently enforced by Brazil. |
id |
FGV-2_28c798d99b529e94c19c59fd803f8ea4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85608 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian PerspectiveChina como economia de mercado após 2016: uma perspectiva brasileiraAnti-dumpingMarket economyChinaTrade remediesBrazilAntidumpingEconomia de mercadoChinaDefesa comercialBrasilThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the recognition of China as a market economy in the context of the Brazilian investigations into trade remedies after 2016 when a clause of China’s protocol of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) expired. Although the interpretation of the Brazilian authority is now clear (a caseby- case evaluation of the sectors under analysis), some aspects of these applications should be further discussed. Among those aspects are the (in)adequate procedural time to address whether China is a market economy, the consequences of the absence of participation by Chinese exporters in these investigations, and the legal uncertainty as to the information that should be considered in the investigation. Finally, the research will provide an empirical analysis on the impact that a counterfactual and unrestricted recognition of China as a market economy might have on current anti-dumping duties currently enforced by Brazil.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar o reconhecimento da China como economia de mercado no contexto das investigações brasileiras de defesa comercial depois de 2016, quando uma cláusula do Protocolo de Acessão da China à Organização Mundial do Comércio (OMC) expirou. Apesar de a interpretação da autoridade brasileira estar agora clara (uma avaliação caso a caso dos setores sob análise), alguns aspectos da aplicação dessa interpretação precisam ser mais profundamente discutidos. Entre esses aspectos estão o momento (in)adequado para discutir se a China é uma economia de mercado, a consequência da ausência de participação de exportadores chineses na investigação e a incerteza a respeito das informações que devem ser consideradas na investigação. Por fim, a pesquisa fornecerá uma análise empírica do impacto que um reconhecimento contrafactual e irrestrito da China como economia de mercado pode ter nos atuais direitos antidumping aplicados pelo Brasil.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2022-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210Revista Direito GV; v. 18 n. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e22102317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608/80783Biasetton, Lucasdo Amaral Júnior, Albertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-25T13:49:01Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85608Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2022-04-25T13:49:01Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective China como economia de mercado após 2016: uma perspectiva brasileira |
title |
China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective |
spellingShingle |
China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective Biasetton, Lucas Anti-dumping Market economy China Trade remedies Brazil Antidumping Economia de mercado China Defesa comercial Brasil |
title_short |
China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective |
title_full |
China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective |
title_fullStr |
China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective |
title_sort |
China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective |
author |
Biasetton, Lucas |
author_facet |
Biasetton, Lucas do Amaral Júnior, Alberto |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
do Amaral Júnior, Alberto |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Biasetton, Lucas do Amaral Júnior, Alberto |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anti-dumping Market economy China Trade remedies Brazil Antidumping Economia de mercado China Defesa comercial Brasil |
topic |
Anti-dumping Market economy China Trade remedies Brazil Antidumping Economia de mercado China Defesa comercial Brasil |
description |
The purpose of this paper is to analyze the recognition of China as a market economy in the context of the Brazilian investigations into trade remedies after 2016 when a clause of China’s protocol of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) expired. Although the interpretation of the Brazilian authority is now clear (a caseby- case evaluation of the sectors under analysis), some aspects of these applications should be further discussed. Among those aspects are the (in)adequate procedural time to address whether China is a market economy, the consequences of the absence of participation by Chinese exporters in these investigations, and the legal uncertainty as to the information that should be considered in the investigation. Finally, the research will provide an empirical analysis on the impact that a counterfactual and unrestricted recognition of China as a market economy might have on current anti-dumping duties currently enforced by Brazil. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-03-31 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608/80783 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210 Revista Direito GV; v. 18 n. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943710872862720 |