China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Biasetton, Lucas
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: do Amaral Júnior, Alberto
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608
Resumo: The purpose of this paper is to analyze the recognition of China as a market economy in the context of the Brazilian investigations into trade remedies after 2016 when a clause of China’s protocol of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) expired. Although the interpretation of the Brazilian authority is now clear (a caseby- case evaluation of the sectors under analysis), some aspects of these applications should be further discussed. Among those aspects are the (in)adequate procedural time to address whether China is a market economy, the consequences of the absence of participation by Chinese exporters in these investigations, and the legal uncertainty as to the information that should be considered in the investigation. Finally, the research will provide an empirical analysis on the impact that a counterfactual and unrestricted recognition of China as a market economy might have on current anti-dumping duties currently enforced by Brazil.
id FGV-2_28c798d99b529e94c19c59fd803f8ea4
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85608
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian PerspectiveChina como economia de mercado após 2016: uma perspectiva brasileiraAnti-dumpingMarket economyChinaTrade remediesBrazilAntidumpingEconomia de mercadoChinaDefesa comercialBrasilThe purpose of this paper is to analyze the recognition of China as a market economy in the context of the Brazilian investigations into trade remedies after 2016 when a clause of China’s protocol of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) expired. Although the interpretation of the Brazilian authority is now clear (a caseby- case evaluation of the sectors under analysis), some aspects of these applications should be further discussed. Among those aspects are the (in)adequate procedural time to address whether China is a market economy, the consequences of the absence of participation by Chinese exporters in these investigations, and the legal uncertainty as to the information that should be considered in the investigation. Finally, the research will provide an empirical analysis on the impact that a counterfactual and unrestricted recognition of China as a market economy might have on current anti-dumping duties currently enforced by Brazil.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar o reconhecimento da China como economia de mercado no contexto das investigações brasileiras de defesa comercial depois de 2016, quando uma cláusula do Protocolo de Acessão da China à Organização Mundial do Comércio (OMC) expirou. Apesar de a interpretação da autoridade brasileira estar agora clara (uma avaliação caso a caso dos setores sob análise), alguns aspectos da aplicação dessa interpretação precisam ser mais profundamente discutidos. Entre esses aspectos estão o momento (in)adequado para discutir se a China é uma economia de mercado, a consequência da ausência de participação de exportadores chineses na investigação e a incerteza a respeito das informações que devem ser consideradas na investigação. Por fim, a pesquisa fornecerá uma análise empírica do impacto que um reconhecimento contrafactual e irrestrito da China como economia de mercado pode ter nos atuais direitos antidumping aplicados pelo Brasil.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2022-03-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210Revista Direito GV; v. 18 n. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e22102317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608/80783Biasetton, Lucasdo Amaral Júnior, Albertoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-25T13:49:01Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85608Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2022-04-25T13:49:01Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective
China como economia de mercado após 2016: uma perspectiva brasileira
title China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective
spellingShingle China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective
Biasetton, Lucas
Anti-dumping
Market economy
China
Trade remedies
Brazil
Antidumping
Economia de mercado
China
Defesa comercial
Brasil
title_short China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective
title_full China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective
title_fullStr China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective
title_full_unstemmed China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective
title_sort China as a Market Economy After 2016: A Brazilian Perspective
author Biasetton, Lucas
author_facet Biasetton, Lucas
do Amaral Júnior, Alberto
author_role author
author2 do Amaral Júnior, Alberto
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Biasetton, Lucas
do Amaral Júnior, Alberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Anti-dumping
Market economy
China
Trade remedies
Brazil
Antidumping
Economia de mercado
China
Defesa comercial
Brasil
topic Anti-dumping
Market economy
China
Trade remedies
Brazil
Antidumping
Economia de mercado
China
Defesa comercial
Brasil
description The purpose of this paper is to analyze the recognition of China as a market economy in the context of the Brazilian investigations into trade remedies after 2016 when a clause of China’s protocol of accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) expired. Although the interpretation of the Brazilian authority is now clear (a caseby- case evaluation of the sectors under analysis), some aspects of these applications should be further discussed. Among those aspects are the (in)adequate procedural time to address whether China is a market economy, the consequences of the absence of participation by Chinese exporters in these investigations, and the legal uncertainty as to the information that should be considered in the investigation. Finally, the research will provide an empirical analysis on the impact that a counterfactual and unrestricted recognition of China as a market economy might have on current anti-dumping duties currently enforced by Brazil.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-03-31
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/85608/80783
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 18 Núm. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210
Revista Direito GV; v. 18 n. 1 (2022): jan.-abr. (41); e2210
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943710872862720