Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global law
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24321 |
Resumo: | “Between equal rights, force decides,” said Karl Marx, describing the antinomy of law in antagonistic situations of capitalist production relations, in which “law [stands] against law”. He here addresses a question that lies at the centre of all critical legal theories: what violence is blurred in the medium of the concealment mechanism called ‘law’? to answer this question, we shall attempt below to make Antonio Gramsci’s hegemony theory and his model of a hegemonic law fertile for the theory of law. This tasK has to cope with the twofold difficulty that on the one hand gramsci was no theoretician of law in the narrower sense, which is why the potential of his theory for an analysis of law has only seldom been made use of. On the other, his approach can only be taKen up through a critique of restrictions associated with his times. This applies particularly to his conception of the econoMy as the basis and as the concealed essentialist core (Laclau/Mouffe 2001:69), as well as to his ‘classism’ in the form of a onesided focusing on classes, where there is instead more of a “pluralism of power” and a multiplicity of struggles (Litowitz 2000: 536). We shall accordingly regain key arguments by extending them using current findings of feminist and neo-materialist approaches to legal theory, as well as foucault’s analyses of power technologies and finally a systems-theory interpretation of communicative autonomizations. |
id |
FGV-2_77f88347933d1efa5fd03fc317a1074c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24321 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global lawReconsiderando Gramsci: hegemonia no direito globalGramiscihegemony theorytheory of lawglobal lawGRAMISCITEORIA DA HEGEMONIATEORIA DO DIREITODIREITO GLOBAL“Between equal rights, force decides,” said Karl Marx, describing the antinomy of law in antagonistic situations of capitalist production relations, in which “law [stands] against law”. He here addresses a question that lies at the centre of all critical legal theories: what violence is blurred in the medium of the concealment mechanism called ‘law’? to answer this question, we shall attempt below to make Antonio Gramsci’s hegemony theory and his model of a hegemonic law fertile for the theory of law. This tasK has to cope with the twofold difficulty that on the one hand gramsci was no theoretician of law in the narrower sense, which is why the potential of his theory for an analysis of law has only seldom been made use of. On the other, his approach can only be taKen up through a critique of restrictions associated with his times. This applies particularly to his conception of the econoMy as the basis and as the concealed essentialist core (Laclau/Mouffe 2001:69), as well as to his ‘classism’ in the form of a onesided focusing on classes, where there is instead more of a “pluralism of power” and a multiplicity of struggles (Litowitz 2000: 536). We shall accordingly regain key arguments by extending them using current findings of feminist and neo-materialist approaches to legal theory, as well as foucault’s analyses of power technologies and finally a systems-theory interpretation of communicative autonomizations.“ENTRE DIREITOS IGUAIS, A FORÇA DECIDE”, PROFERIU KARL MARX AO DESCREVER A ANTINOMIA DO DIREITO EM SITUAÇÕES ANTAGÔNICAS DAS RELAÇÕES DE PRODUÇÃO CAPITALISTAS, EM QUE “O DIREITO [OFERECE RESISTÊNCIA] AO DIREITO”. 1 NESSE PONTO, MARX ABORDA UMA QUESTÃO QUE SE SITUA NO CENTRO DE TODAS AS TEORIAS JURÍDICAS CRÍTICAS: QUE TIPO DE VIOLÊNCIA É VELADA POR MEIO DO MECANISMO DE OCULTAÇÃO DENOMINADO “DIREITO”? PARA RESPONDER A ESTA QUESTÃO, TENTAR-SE-Á, A SEGUIR, TORNAR A TEORIA DA HEGEMONIA DE ANTONIO GRAMSCI E SEU MODELO DE DIREITO HEGEMÔNICO PRODUTIVOS PARA O CAMPO DA TEORIA DO DIREITO. TAL TAREFA TEM DE LIDAR COM A DUPLA DIFICULDADE DE QUE, POR UM LADO, GRAMSCI NÃO FOI UM TEÓRICO DO DIREITO NO SENTIDO MAIS ESTRITO, RAZÃO PELA QUAL O POTENCIAL DE SUA TEORIA PARA UMA ANÁLISE DO DIREITO RARAMENTE FOI UTILIZADA. 2 POR OUTRO LADO, SUA ABORDAGEM SÓ PODE SER EMPREGADA POR MEIO DE UMA CRÍTICA ÀS RESTRIÇÕES RELACIONADAS A SEU TEMPO. ISSO SE APLICA ESPECIALMENTE À SUA CONCEPÇÃO DE ECONOMIA COMO A BASE E A NÚCLEO ESSENCIALISTA OCULTO (LACLAU; MOUFFE, 2001:69), ASSIM COMO À SUA IDEIA DE ‘CLASSISMO’ SOB A FORMA DE UM ENFOQUE UNILATERAL DAS CLASSES, EM QUE HÁ PREFERENCIALMENTE MAIS DE UM “PLURALISMO DE PODER” E INÚMERAS LUTAS (LITOWITZ, 2000: 536). RECUPERARSE-Á, CONSEQUENTEMENTE, ARGUMENTOS-CHAVE, AMPLIANDO-OS PELA UTILIZAÇÃO DAS RECENTES DESCOBERTAS FEITAS PELAS ABORDAGENS FEMINISTA E NEOMATERIALISTA DA TEORIA JURÍDICA, BECOMO AS ANÁLISES DE FOUCAULT ACERCA DAS TECNOLOGIAS DE PODER. POR FIM, UMA INTERPRETAÇÃO DA TEORIA SISTÊMICA DAS AUTONOMIZAÇÕES COMUNICATIVAS.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2009-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24321Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2009): jul.-dez (10); 471-490Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2009): jul.-dez (10); 471-490Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 2 (2009): jul.-dez (10); 471-4902317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24321/23092Buckel, SonjaFischer-Lescano, Andreasinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-11-07T14:00:29Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/24321Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-11-07T14:00:29Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global law Reconsiderando Gramsci: hegemonia no direito global |
title |
Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global law |
spellingShingle |
Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global law Buckel, Sonja Gramisci hegemony theory theory of law global law GRAMISCI TEORIA DA HEGEMONIA TEORIA DO DIREITO DIREITO GLOBAL |
title_short |
Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global law |
title_full |
Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global law |
title_fullStr |
Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global law |
title_full_unstemmed |
Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global law |
title_sort |
Gramsci reconsidered: hegemony in global law |
author |
Buckel, Sonja |
author_facet |
Buckel, Sonja Fischer-Lescano, Andreas |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Buckel, Sonja Fischer-Lescano, Andreas |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gramisci hegemony theory theory of law global law GRAMISCI TEORIA DA HEGEMONIA TEORIA DO DIREITO DIREITO GLOBAL |
topic |
Gramisci hegemony theory theory of law global law GRAMISCI TEORIA DA HEGEMONIA TEORIA DO DIREITO DIREITO GLOBAL |
description |
“Between equal rights, force decides,” said Karl Marx, describing the antinomy of law in antagonistic situations of capitalist production relations, in which “law [stands] against law”. He here addresses a question that lies at the centre of all critical legal theories: what violence is blurred in the medium of the concealment mechanism called ‘law’? to answer this question, we shall attempt below to make Antonio Gramsci’s hegemony theory and his model of a hegemonic law fertile for the theory of law. This tasK has to cope with the twofold difficulty that on the one hand gramsci was no theoretician of law in the narrower sense, which is why the potential of his theory for an analysis of law has only seldom been made use of. On the other, his approach can only be taKen up through a critique of restrictions associated with his times. This applies particularly to his conception of the econoMy as the basis and as the concealed essentialist core (Laclau/Mouffe 2001:69), as well as to his ‘classism’ in the form of a onesided focusing on classes, where there is instead more of a “pluralism of power” and a multiplicity of struggles (Litowitz 2000: 536). We shall accordingly regain key arguments by extending them using current findings of feminist and neo-materialist approaches to legal theory, as well as foucault’s analyses of power technologies and finally a systems-theory interpretation of communicative autonomizations. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24321 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24321 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/24321/23092 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2009): jul.-dez (10); 471-490 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 5 Núm. 2 (2009): jul.-dez (10); 471-490 Revista Direito GV; v. 5 n. 2 (2009): jul.-dez (10); 471-490 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943708821848064 |