Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011?
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2016 |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
| Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/59458 |
Resumo: | This paper aims to analyze the relationship between the Judicial and Legislative branches. It analyzes the reasons and the proposals from the Parliament to restrict the Supreme Court’s role in judicial review. It also presents the academic debate between Ronald Dworkin and Jeremy Waldron, renowned legal scholars who significantly influenced the discussion about this theme. At the end, it presents some considerations about the PEC 33/2011 in order to evaluate if this proposal to amend Brazilian Constitution is absurd, reasonable or beneficial for regarding the relationship between the Judicial and Legislative branches. |
| id |
FGV-2_97ee4967a5e5c8320b428b4d4154e317 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/59458 |
| network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
| network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011?Judicial review: podemos tirar algum proveito da PEC 33/2011?Judicial reviewPEC 33/2011Supreme Court’s supremacyDworkinWaldronBrazilControle judicial da constitucionalidadePEC n. 33/2011supremacia do tribunalDworkinWaldronBrasilThis paper aims to analyze the relationship between the Judicial and Legislative branches. It analyzes the reasons and the proposals from the Parliament to restrict the Supreme Court’s role in judicial review. It also presents the academic debate between Ronald Dworkin and Jeremy Waldron, renowned legal scholars who significantly influenced the discussion about this theme. At the end, it presents some considerations about the PEC 33/2011 in order to evaluate if this proposal to amend Brazilian Constitution is absurd, reasonable or beneficial for regarding the relationship between the Judicial and Legislative branches.O presente trabalho busca analisar a atual relação entre os poderes Judiciário e Legislativo, com ênfase na edição da PEC n. 33/2011. Serão analisados os motivos e as propostas do Parlamento para buscar restringir a atuação do STF no controle de constitucionalidade, bem como o debate acadêmico travado entre Ronald Dworkin e Jeremy Waldron, juristas de renome que influenciaram de forma significativa a discussão sobre o tema. Ao final, serão feitas algumas considerações sobre a PEC n. 33/2011, no sentido de se verificar se ela realmente é absurda, adequada ou benéfica ao tratamento da matéria.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2016-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/59458Revista Direito GV; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2016): jan.-jun. (23); 125-154Revista Direito GV; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2016): jan.-jun. (23); 125-154Revista Direito GV; v. 12 n. 1 (2016): jan.-jun. (23); 125-1542317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/59458/57849Copyright (c) 2016 Revista DIREITO GVinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGiannetti, Leonardo Varella2019-08-15T14:52:42Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/59458Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2019-08-15T14:52:42Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011? Judicial review: podemos tirar algum proveito da PEC 33/2011? |
| title |
Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011? |
| spellingShingle |
Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011? Giannetti, Leonardo Varella Judicial review PEC 33/2011 Supreme Court’s supremacy Dworkin Waldron Brazil Controle judicial da constitucionalidade PEC n. 33/2011 supremacia do tribunal Dworkin Waldron Brasil |
| title_short |
Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011? |
| title_full |
Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011? |
| title_fullStr |
Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011? |
| title_sort |
Judicial review: could we take any advantage from the PEC 33/2011? |
| author |
Giannetti, Leonardo Varella |
| author_facet |
Giannetti, Leonardo Varella |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Giannetti, Leonardo Varella |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Judicial review PEC 33/2011 Supreme Court’s supremacy Dworkin Waldron Brazil Controle judicial da constitucionalidade PEC n. 33/2011 supremacia do tribunal Dworkin Waldron Brasil |
| topic |
Judicial review PEC 33/2011 Supreme Court’s supremacy Dworkin Waldron Brazil Controle judicial da constitucionalidade PEC n. 33/2011 supremacia do tribunal Dworkin Waldron Brasil |
| description |
This paper aims to analyze the relationship between the Judicial and Legislative branches. It analyzes the reasons and the proposals from the Parliament to restrict the Supreme Court’s role in judicial review. It also presents the academic debate between Ronald Dworkin and Jeremy Waldron, renowned legal scholars who significantly influenced the discussion about this theme. At the end, it presents some considerations about the PEC 33/2011 in order to evaluate if this proposal to amend Brazilian Constitution is absurd, reasonable or beneficial for regarding the relationship between the Judicial and Legislative branches. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-01-01 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/59458 |
| url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/59458 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/59458/57849 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista DIREITO GV info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2016 Revista DIREITO GV |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 12 No. 1 (2016): jan.-jun. (23); 125-154 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 12 Núm. 1 (2016): jan.-jun. (23); 125-154 Revista Direito GV; v. 12 n. 1 (2016): jan.-jun. (23); 125-154 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
| instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
| instacron_str |
FGV |
| institution |
FGV |
| reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
| collection |
Revista Direito GV |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
| _version_ |
1798943709713137664 |