Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2023 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Direito GV |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313 |
Resumo: | This work aims to investigate the limits for the recognition of the condition of fugitive in the judicial discourse and its consequences in the decree, maintenance or revocation of preventive detention. The article uses two main strategies to answer the proposed problem. The first consists in the elaboration of a literature review on escape and procedural arrest, mapping the contours and absences on this topic in the scientific literature. It is noted the absence of a concrete treatment regarding the meanings and limits for the recognition of the scape in the criminal process. The second strategy consists of an empirical analysis of decisions of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), issued between 2020 and 2021. As a result of the research, it can be said that the STJ has positions that sometimes limit the sense of escape, such as the distinction between non-location and escape, sometimes relativize their consequences, like the escapes distant in time, and sometimes reaffirm the meaning of the escape as a justification for the imposition of procedural arrests, as in the case of permanence of the escape at the time of the decision. In this sense, the article contributes to the understanding of the meanings that the Judiciary attributes to the category of escape throughout the criminal process. |
id |
FGV-2_a44fb171ddc4082bcd134efd48b7bfbd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90313 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Direito GV |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial SpeechConstruindo o foragido: usos e sentidos da fuga no discurso judicialCriminal proceedingsescapeprisonprecautionary measuresjudicial speechProcesso penalfugaprisãomedidas cautelaresdiscurso judicialThis work aims to investigate the limits for the recognition of the condition of fugitive in the judicial discourse and its consequences in the decree, maintenance or revocation of preventive detention. The article uses two main strategies to answer the proposed problem. The first consists in the elaboration of a literature review on escape and procedural arrest, mapping the contours and absences on this topic in the scientific literature. It is noted the absence of a concrete treatment regarding the meanings and limits for the recognition of the scape in the criminal process. The second strategy consists of an empirical analysis of decisions of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), issued between 2020 and 2021. As a result of the research, it can be said that the STJ has positions that sometimes limit the sense of escape, such as the distinction between non-location and escape, sometimes relativize their consequences, like the escapes distant in time, and sometimes reaffirm the meaning of the escape as a justification for the imposition of procedural arrests, as in the case of permanence of the escape at the time of the decision. In this sense, the article contributes to the understanding of the meanings that the Judiciary attributes to the category of escape throughout the criminal process.Este artigo tem o objetivo de investigar quais os limites para o reconhecimento da condição de foragido no discurso judicial e as suas consequências na decretação, na manutenção ou na revogação da prisão preventiva. O artigo utiliza duas principais estratégias para responder ao problema proposto. A primeira consiste na elaboração de uma revisão de literatura sobre fuga e prisão processual, mapeando os contornos e as ausências sobre esse tema na literatura científica. Nota-se a ausência de um tratamento concreto a respeito dos significados e limites para o reconhecimento da fuga no processo penal. A segunda estratégia consiste em uma análise empírica de decisões do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), proferidas entre 2020 e 2021. Como resultados da pesquisa, pode-se afirmar que o STJ tem posições que ora limitam o sentido da fuga, como a distinção entre não localização e fuga, ora relativizam suas consequências, a exemplo das fugas distantes no tempo, ora reafirmam o sentido da fuga como justificativa para imposição de prisões processuais, como o caso de permanência da fuga no momento da decisão. Nesse sentido, o artigo contribui para a compreensão dos sentidos que o Poder Judiciário atribui à categoria da fuga ao longo do processo penal.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2023-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e23342317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313/84793Fonseca Fernandes, Danielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-13T10:09:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90313Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2023-11-13T10:09:06Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech Construindo o foragido: usos e sentidos da fuga no discurso judicial |
title |
Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech |
spellingShingle |
Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech Fonseca Fernandes, Daniel Criminal proceedings escape prison precautionary measures judicial speech Processo penal fuga prisão medidas cautelares discurso judicial |
title_short |
Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech |
title_full |
Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech |
title_fullStr |
Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech |
title_full_unstemmed |
Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech |
title_sort |
Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech |
author |
Fonseca Fernandes, Daniel |
author_facet |
Fonseca Fernandes, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Fonseca Fernandes, Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Criminal proceedings escape prison precautionary measures judicial speech Processo penal fuga prisão medidas cautelares discurso judicial |
topic |
Criminal proceedings escape prison precautionary measures judicial speech Processo penal fuga prisão medidas cautelares discurso judicial |
description |
This work aims to investigate the limits for the recognition of the condition of fugitive in the judicial discourse and its consequences in the decree, maintenance or revocation of preventive detention. The article uses two main strategies to answer the proposed problem. The first consists in the elaboration of a literature review on escape and procedural arrest, mapping the contours and absences on this topic in the scientific literature. It is noted the absence of a concrete treatment regarding the meanings and limits for the recognition of the scape in the criminal process. The second strategy consists of an empirical analysis of decisions of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), issued between 2020 and 2021. As a result of the research, it can be said that the STJ has positions that sometimes limit the sense of escape, such as the distinction between non-location and escape, sometimes relativize their consequences, like the escapes distant in time, and sometimes reaffirm the meaning of the escape as a justification for the imposition of procedural arrests, as in the case of permanence of the escape at the time of the decision. In this sense, the article contributes to the understanding of the meanings that the Judiciary attributes to the category of escape throughout the criminal process. |
publishDate |
2023 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2023-11-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313/84793 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334 Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334 Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334 2317-6172 reponame:Revista Direito GV instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista Direito GV |
collection |
Revista Direito GV |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943711212601344 |