Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Fonseca Fernandes, Daniel
Data de Publicação: 2023
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista Direito GV
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313
Resumo: This work aims to investigate the limits for the recognition of the condition of fugitive in the judicial discourse and its consequences in the decree, maintenance or revocation of preventive detention. The article uses two main strategies to answer the proposed problem. The first consists in the elaboration of a literature review on escape and procedural arrest, mapping the contours and absences on this topic in the scientific literature. It is noted the absence of a concrete treatment regarding the meanings and limits for the recognition of the scape in the criminal process. The second strategy consists of an empirical analysis of decisions of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), issued between 2020 and 2021. As a result of the research, it can be said that the STJ has positions that sometimes limit the sense of escape, such as the distinction between non-location and escape, sometimes relativize their consequences, like the escapes distant in time, and sometimes reaffirm the meaning of the escape as a justification for the imposition of procedural arrests, as in the case of permanence of the escape at the time of the decision. In this sense, the article contributes to the understanding of the meanings that the Judiciary attributes to the category of escape throughout the criminal process.
id FGV-2_a44fb171ddc4082bcd134efd48b7bfbd
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90313
network_acronym_str FGV-2
network_name_str Revista Direito GV
repository_id_str
spelling Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial SpeechConstruindo o foragido: usos e sentidos da fuga no discurso judicialCriminal proceedingsescapeprisonprecautionary measuresjudicial speechProcesso penalfugaprisãomedidas cautelaresdiscurso judicialThis work aims to investigate the limits for the recognition of the condition of fugitive in the judicial discourse and its consequences in the decree, maintenance or revocation of preventive detention. The article uses two main strategies to answer the proposed problem. The first consists in the elaboration of a literature review on escape and procedural arrest, mapping the contours and absences on this topic in the scientific literature. It is noted the absence of a concrete treatment regarding the meanings and limits for the recognition of the scape in the criminal process. The second strategy consists of an empirical analysis of decisions of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), issued between 2020 and 2021. As a result of the research, it can be said that the STJ has positions that sometimes limit the sense of escape, such as the distinction between non-location and escape, sometimes relativize their consequences, like the escapes distant in time, and sometimes reaffirm the meaning of the escape as a justification for the imposition of procedural arrests, as in the case of permanence of the escape at the time of the decision. In this sense, the article contributes to the understanding of the meanings that the Judiciary attributes to the category of escape throughout the criminal process.Este artigo tem o objetivo de investigar quais os limites para o reconhecimento da condição de foragido no discurso judicial e as suas consequências na decretação, na manutenção ou na revogação da prisão preventiva. O artigo utiliza duas principais estratégias para responder ao problema proposto. A primeira consiste na elaboração de uma revisão de literatura sobre fuga e prisão processual, mapeando os contornos e as ausências sobre esse tema na literatura científica. Nota-se a ausência de um tratamento concreto a respeito dos significados e limites para o reconhecimento da fuga no processo penal. A segunda estratégia consiste em uma análise empírica de decisões do Superior Tribunal de Justiça (STJ), proferidas entre 2020 e 2021. Como resultados da pesquisa, pode-se afirmar que o STJ tem posições que ora limitam o sentido da fuga, como a distinção entre não localização e fuga, ora relativizam suas consequências, a exemplo das fugas distantes no tempo, ora reafirmam o sentido da fuga como justificativa para imposição de prisões processuais, como o caso de permanência da fuga no momento da decisão. Nesse sentido, o artigo contribui para a compreensão dos sentidos que o Poder Judiciário atribui à categoria da fuga ao longo do processo penal.Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas2023-11-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e23342317-6172reponame:Revista Direito GVinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313/84793Fonseca Fernandes, Danielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-13T10:09:06Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/90313Revistahttps://direitosp.fgv.br/publicacoes/revista/revista-direito-gvPRIhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br2317-61721808-2432opendoar:2023-11-13T10:09:06Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech
Construindo o foragido: usos e sentidos da fuga no discurso judicial
title Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech
spellingShingle Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech
Fonseca Fernandes, Daniel
Criminal proceedings
escape
prison
precautionary measures
judicial speech
Processo penal
fuga
prisão
medidas cautelares
discurso judicial
title_short Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech
title_full Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech
title_fullStr Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech
title_full_unstemmed Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech
title_sort Constructing the Fugitive: Uses and Meanings of Escape in Judicial Speech
author Fonseca Fernandes, Daniel
author_facet Fonseca Fernandes, Daniel
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Fonseca Fernandes, Daniel
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Criminal proceedings
escape
prison
precautionary measures
judicial speech
Processo penal
fuga
prisão
medidas cautelares
discurso judicial
topic Criminal proceedings
escape
prison
precautionary measures
judicial speech
Processo penal
fuga
prisão
medidas cautelares
discurso judicial
description This work aims to investigate the limits for the recognition of the condition of fugitive in the judicial discourse and its consequences in the decree, maintenance or revocation of preventive detention. The article uses two main strategies to answer the proposed problem. The first consists in the elaboration of a literature review on escape and procedural arrest, mapping the contours and absences on this topic in the scientific literature. It is noted the absence of a concrete treatment regarding the meanings and limits for the recognition of the scape in the criminal process. The second strategy consists of an empirical analysis of decisions of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), issued between 2020 and 2021. As a result of the research, it can be said that the STJ has positions that sometimes limit the sense of escape, such as the distinction between non-location and escape, sometimes relativize their consequences, like the escapes distant in time, and sometimes reaffirm the meaning of the escape as a justification for the imposition of procedural arrests, as in the case of permanence of the escape at the time of the decision. In this sense, the article contributes to the understanding of the meanings that the Judiciary attributes to the category of escape throughout the criminal process.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-11-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/revdireitogv/article/view/90313/84793
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola de Direito de São Paulo da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334
Revista Direito GV; Vol. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334
Revista Direito GV; v. 19 (2023): 2023; e2334
2317-6172
reponame:Revista Direito GV
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Revista Direito GV
collection Revista Direito GV
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Direito GV - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistadireitogv@fgv.br|| catarina.barbieri@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943711212601344