Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theory
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2008 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6626 |
Resumo: | This article takes a critical look at how democracy is practiced today. It reflects on democracy in modern times, when the boundaries imposed by the bureaucratic state indicate the possibility of a productive development of deliberative democracy. It then observe in theory the discursive practice and its democratic potential so as to reveal to what extent the strategic direction of actions in allegedly democratic discursive spaces compromises the meaning of participatory equality. To illustrate its theoretical approach, it presents an empirical analysis of the case of Economic and Social Development Council (CDES) a forum composed by civil society and government representatives created in the beginning of the Lula administration in order to improve the participation of society in state issues. Even though the adoption of this model has represented an advance, when the democratic context is analyzed through the discourse theory there are new analytical references of the contradictions in which the democratic practice is established in these kinds of forums. The CDES case reveals a paradox: although some procedures characterize deliberative democracy, strategic orientation is recurrent. |
id |
FGV-4_04109fe5335e482c186d8da1cca19bfe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6626 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theoryDemocracia deliberativa: leitura crítica do caso CDES à luz da teoria do discursoBrazilian public administrationdeliberative democracycommunicative action theory.administração pública brasileirademocracia deliberativateoria da ação comunicativa.This article takes a critical look at how democracy is practiced today. It reflects on democracy in modern times, when the boundaries imposed by the bureaucratic state indicate the possibility of a productive development of deliberative democracy. It then observe in theory the discursive practice and its democratic potential so as to reveal to what extent the strategic direction of actions in allegedly democratic discursive spaces compromises the meaning of participatory equality. To illustrate its theoretical approach, it presents an empirical analysis of the case of Economic and Social Development Council (CDES) a forum composed by civil society and government representatives created in the beginning of the Lula administration in order to improve the participation of society in state issues. Even though the adoption of this model has represented an advance, when the democratic context is analyzed through the discourse theory there are new analytical references of the contradictions in which the democratic practice is established in these kinds of forums. The CDES case reveals a paradox: although some procedures characterize deliberative democracy, strategic orientation is recurrent.Este artigo propõe uma leitura crítica da prática da democracia em tempos atuais. Para tanto, empreende uma reflexão sobre a democracia na modernidade, em que os limites impostos pelo Estado burocrático apontam para a possibilidade do desenvolvimento mais profícuo da democracia deliberativa. Os autores observam teoricamente a prática discursiva e seu potencial democratizante, para então desvelar em que medida a orientação estratégica da ação em espaços discursivos pretensamente democráticos compromete o sentido de igualdade participativa. Para ilustrar a abordagem teórica, analisam empiricamente o caso do Conselho de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (CDES), um fórum de debates entre representantes da sociedade civil e do governo, criado no início da gestão Lula no intuito de fomentar a participação da sociedade em questões do Estado. A despeito do avanço obtido na adoção de tal modelo, quando o contexto democrático é analisado à luz da teoria do discurso, surgem novas referências de análise das contradições nas quais se estabelece a prática democrática nesses tipos de fóruns. O caso do CDES revela um paradoxo: apesar de certos procedimentos da democracia deliberativa, é recorrente a orientação estratégica.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2008-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6626Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2008); 83 a 108Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2008); 83 a 108Revista de Administração Pública; v. 42 n. 1 (2008); 83 a 1081982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6626/5210Vizeu, FábioBin, Danielinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:53:43Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6626Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:53:43Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theory Democracia deliberativa: leitura crítica do caso CDES à luz da teoria do discurso |
title |
Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theory |
spellingShingle |
Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theory Vizeu, Fábio Brazilian public administration deliberative democracy communicative action theory. administração pública brasileira democracia deliberativa teoria da ação comunicativa. |
title_short |
Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theory |
title_full |
Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theory |
title_fullStr |
Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theory |
title_full_unstemmed |
Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theory |
title_sort |
Deliberative democracy: a critical look at the CDES case through the discourse theory |
author |
Vizeu, Fábio |
author_facet |
Vizeu, Fábio Bin, Daniel |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bin, Daniel |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vizeu, Fábio Bin, Daniel |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian public administration deliberative democracy communicative action theory. administração pública brasileira democracia deliberativa teoria da ação comunicativa. |
topic |
Brazilian public administration deliberative democracy communicative action theory. administração pública brasileira democracia deliberativa teoria da ação comunicativa. |
description |
This article takes a critical look at how democracy is practiced today. It reflects on democracy in modern times, when the boundaries imposed by the bureaucratic state indicate the possibility of a productive development of deliberative democracy. It then observe in theory the discursive practice and its democratic potential so as to reveal to what extent the strategic direction of actions in allegedly democratic discursive spaces compromises the meaning of participatory equality. To illustrate its theoretical approach, it presents an empirical analysis of the case of Economic and Social Development Council (CDES) a forum composed by civil society and government representatives created in the beginning of the Lula administration in order to improve the participation of society in state issues. Even though the adoption of this model has represented an advance, when the democratic context is analyzed through the discourse theory there are new analytical references of the contradictions in which the democratic practice is established in these kinds of forums. The CDES case reveals a paradox: although some procedures characterize deliberative democracy, strategic orientation is recurrent. |
publishDate |
2008 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2008-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6626 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6626 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6626/5210 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 42 No. 1 (2008); 83 a 108 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 42 Núm. 1 (2008); 83 a 108 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 42 n. 1 (2008); 83 a 108 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943763981139968 |