Political bargaining practices through federal budget execution
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por eng |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82215 |
Resumo: | The Brazilian budgetary process has historically been questioned based on the alleged use of political bargaining in the inclusion and implementation of amendments from deputies to the executive’s budget, which affects the principles, criteria, and practices of allocative choices. Supported by the theory of coalition formation, this article examines a possible political bargaining relationship between the executive and legislative branches in the budgetary process at the federal level. The study analyzed the execution of amendments from deputies over five mandates (between 2000 and 2017) and the deputies’ votes on projects proposed by the executive. Data regarding the execution of singular amendments were also analyzed, together with information concerning the deputies’ political position toward the executive when proposing amendments. Econometric techniques were employed to correct selection bias, assessing the presence of political bargaining. The results corroborate the hypothesis that there is political bargaining in the relationship between the executive and legislative branches in Brazil. The deputy who had more of their amendments executed by the government was also the one that voted with the government in the bills sent from the executive to the legislative, even though they were not part of the governing coalition in the Congress. Therefore, the executive targeted deputies who were not part of the governing coalition to increase the number of votes in Congress. |
id |
FGV-4_41fdae702ac82b73d3f311dda0360b5a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/82215 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Political bargaining practices through federal budget executionPrácticas de regateo político mediante la ejecución presupuestaria federalPráticas de barganha política por meio da execução orçamentária federalcoalition presidentialismbudgeting processsingular amendmentspolitical bargaining.presidencialismo de coaliciónproceso presupuestarioenmiendas singularesregateo político.presidencialismo de coalizãoprocesso orçamentárioemendas singularesbarganha política.The Brazilian budgetary process has historically been questioned based on the alleged use of political bargaining in the inclusion and implementation of amendments from deputies to the executive’s budget, which affects the principles, criteria, and practices of allocative choices. Supported by the theory of coalition formation, this article examines a possible political bargaining relationship between the executive and legislative branches in the budgetary process at the federal level. The study analyzed the execution of amendments from deputies over five mandates (between 2000 and 2017) and the deputies’ votes on projects proposed by the executive. Data regarding the execution of singular amendments were also analyzed, together with information concerning the deputies’ political position toward the executive when proposing amendments. Econometric techniques were employed to correct selection bias, assessing the presence of political bargaining. The results corroborate the hypothesis that there is political bargaining in the relationship between the executive and legislative branches in Brazil. The deputy who had more of their amendments executed by the government was also the one that voted with the government in the bills sent from the executive to the legislative, even though they were not part of the governing coalition in the Congress. Therefore, the executive targeted deputies who were not part of the governing coalition to increase the number of votes in Congress.El proceso presupuestario brasileño ha sido históricamente cuestionado por la supuesta presencia de regateo político en la inclusión y ejecución de enmiendas al presupuesto, hecho que interfiere con las premisas, criterios y prácticas de las decisiones distributivas. Este artículo, apoyado en la Teoría de la Formación de Coaliciones, investiga la existencia de una posible relación de regateo político entre los poderes Ejecutivo y Legislativo en el proceso presupuestario a nivel federal. Dicha investigación se da a través del análisis de las ejecuciones de enmiendas parlamentarias singulares en cinco legislaturas (entre 2000 y 2017) y de las decisiones de los diputados en la votación de proyectos propuestos por el Ejecutivo. Se analizaron datos referentes a la ejecución de enmiendas singulares, así como los referentes a la posición política del parlamentario frente al Ejecutivo al momento de la proposición de las enmiendas. La metodología involucró técnicas econométricas que tratan la corrección del sesgo de selección para evaluar la presencia o ausencia de la referida relación de regateo. Los resultados obtenidos corroboran la hipótesis de existencia de regateo político entre los poderes Ejecutivo y Legislativo, ya que el parlamentario con mayor aporte de ejecución de sus enmiendas singulares fue quien, además de haber apoyado al Ejecutivo a través de votos a favor de los proyectos remitidos al Congreso Nacional, era ajeno a la coalición de gobierno, objetivo del Ejecutivo en la formación del quórum mínimo para la aprobación de sus proyectos.O processo orçamentário brasileiro tem sido historicamente questionado pela suposta presença de barganha política na inclusão e na execução de emendas ao orçamento, fato que interfere nas premissas, nos critérios e nas práticas das escolhas alocativas. Este artigo, sustentado pela Teoria da Formação de Coalizões, investiga a existência de uma possível relação de barganha política entre os poderes Executivo e Legislativo no processo orçamentário na esfera federal. Tal pesquisa ocorre por meio da análise das execuções de emendas parlamentares singulares ao longo de cinco legislaturas (entre 2000 e 2017) e das decisões dos deputados na votação de projetos propostos pelo Executivo. Analisaram-se dados referentes à execução de emendas singulares, bem como aqueles concernentes à posição política do parlamentar com relação ao Executivo no instante da proposição das emendas. A metodologia envolveu técnicas econométricas que lidam com a correção do viés de seleção para avaliar a presença ou não da referida relação de barganha. Os resultados obtidos corroboram a hipótese de existência de barganha política entre os poderes Executivo e Legislativo, pois o parlamentar com maior aporte de execução de suas emendas singulares foi aquele que, além de ter exercido apoio ao Executivo através de votos favoráveis aos projetos enviados ao congresso nacional, era de fora da coligação de governo, alvo do Executivo na formação do quorum mínimo para a aprovação de seus projetos.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2020-09-24info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82215Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 54 No. 5 (2020); 1361-1381Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 54 Núm. 5 (2020); 1361-1381Revista de Administração Pública; v. 54 n. 5 (2020); 1361-13811982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82215/78306https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82215/pdf_396Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Administração Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGraton, Luis Henrique TeixeiraBonacim, Carlos Alberto GrespanSakurai, Sérgio Naruhiko2020-10-21T16:13:59Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/82215Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2020-10-21T16:13:59Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Political bargaining practices through federal budget execution Prácticas de regateo político mediante la ejecución presupuestaria federal Práticas de barganha política por meio da execução orçamentária federal |
title |
Political bargaining practices through federal budget execution |
spellingShingle |
Political bargaining practices through federal budget execution Graton, Luis Henrique Teixeira coalition presidentialism budgeting process singular amendments political bargaining. presidencialismo de coalición proceso presupuestario enmiendas singulares regateo político. presidencialismo de coalizão processo orçamentário emendas singulares barganha política. |
title_short |
Political bargaining practices through federal budget execution |
title_full |
Political bargaining practices through federal budget execution |
title_fullStr |
Political bargaining practices through federal budget execution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Political bargaining practices through federal budget execution |
title_sort |
Political bargaining practices through federal budget execution |
author |
Graton, Luis Henrique Teixeira |
author_facet |
Graton, Luis Henrique Teixeira Bonacim, Carlos Alberto Grespan Sakurai, Sérgio Naruhiko |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bonacim, Carlos Alberto Grespan Sakurai, Sérgio Naruhiko |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Graton, Luis Henrique Teixeira Bonacim, Carlos Alberto Grespan Sakurai, Sérgio Naruhiko |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
coalition presidentialism budgeting process singular amendments political bargaining. presidencialismo de coalición proceso presupuestario enmiendas singulares regateo político. presidencialismo de coalizão processo orçamentário emendas singulares barganha política. |
topic |
coalition presidentialism budgeting process singular amendments political bargaining. presidencialismo de coalición proceso presupuestario enmiendas singulares regateo político. presidencialismo de coalizão processo orçamentário emendas singulares barganha política. |
description |
The Brazilian budgetary process has historically been questioned based on the alleged use of political bargaining in the inclusion and implementation of amendments from deputies to the executive’s budget, which affects the principles, criteria, and practices of allocative choices. Supported by the theory of coalition formation, this article examines a possible political bargaining relationship between the executive and legislative branches in the budgetary process at the federal level. The study analyzed the execution of amendments from deputies over five mandates (between 2000 and 2017) and the deputies’ votes on projects proposed by the executive. Data regarding the execution of singular amendments were also analyzed, together with information concerning the deputies’ political position toward the executive when proposing amendments. Econometric techniques were employed to correct selection bias, assessing the presence of political bargaining. The results corroborate the hypothesis that there is political bargaining in the relationship between the executive and legislative branches in Brazil. The deputy who had more of their amendments executed by the government was also the one that voted with the government in the bills sent from the executive to the legislative, even though they were not part of the governing coalition in the Congress. Therefore, the executive targeted deputies who were not part of the governing coalition to increase the number of votes in Congress. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-09-24 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82215 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82215 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por eng |
language |
por eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82215/78306 https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/82215/pdf_396 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Administração Pública info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Administração Pública |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 54 No. 5 (2020); 1361-1381 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 54 Núm. 5 (2020); 1361-1381 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 54 n. 5 (2020); 1361-1381 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943774189027328 |