Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institution
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Administração Pública |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6913 |
Resumo: | University evaluation has been defended as a necessary tool to promote institutional competence and to improve teaching, research, extension programs and institutional management. In order to examine the institutional management process at the Federal University of Santa Maria (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, UFSM, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), this article presents the results of a research that identified the factors that, as perceived by 263 UFSM professors, interfere in the continuity and improvement of the institutional evaluation process. Data was collected in questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. Between 79.9% and 95.7% of the studied factors either facilitate or obstruct the evaluation process, the following standing out with over 70%: “being conscious of the importance of evaluation”; “clear establishment of the indicating criteria that will be used in the evaluation”; “establishment and disclosure of the institution’s policies”; and the “existence of an internal evaluation commission”. To summarize, despite the exploratory nature of the study, the results revealed an adequate picture of UFSM’s evaluation process. |
id |
FGV-4_e4f54eef302f027968d537333ea8876e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6913 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-4 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institutionPercepção da avaliação: um retrato da gestão pública em uma instituição de ensino superior (IES)public managementinstitutional evaluationhigher education institutions.gestão públicaavaliação institucionalinstituições de ensino.University evaluation has been defended as a necessary tool to promote institutional competence and to improve teaching, research, extension programs and institutional management. In order to examine the institutional management process at the Federal University of Santa Maria (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, UFSM, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), this article presents the results of a research that identified the factors that, as perceived by 263 UFSM professors, interfere in the continuity and improvement of the institutional evaluation process. Data was collected in questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. Between 79.9% and 95.7% of the studied factors either facilitate or obstruct the evaluation process, the following standing out with over 70%: “being conscious of the importance of evaluation”; “clear establishment of the indicating criteria that will be used in the evaluation”; “establishment and disclosure of the institution’s policies”; and the “existence of an internal evaluation commission”. To summarize, despite the exploratory nature of the study, the results revealed an adequate picture of UFSM’s evaluation process.A avaliação das universidades vem sendo defendida como instrumento necessário para elevar a qualificação institucional, promovendo a melhoria do ensino, da pesquisa, da extensão e de sua gestão. Com o objetivo de avaliar o processo de gestão institucional da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), no Rio Grande do Sul, este artigo apresenta os resultados de uma pesquisa que levantou os fatores que, na percepção de 163 docentes da UFSM, interferem na continuidade e no aperfeiçoamento do processo de avaliação institucional. Os dados foram coletados por meio de questionários e analisados através de técnicas estatísticas descritivas e inferenciais. Entre 79,9% e 95,7% dos fatores estudados facilitam ou dificultam o processo de avaliação, destacando-se com mais de 70% os seguintes: “consciência da importância da avaliação”, “definição clara dos critérios indicadores a serem utilizados na avaliação”, “definição e divulgação das políticas da instituição” e a “existência de comissão interna de avaliação”. Em síntese, apesar do caráter exploratório do estudo, os resultados obtidos permitiram construir uma imagem adequada sobre a avaliação na UFSM.Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2010-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6913Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2010); 31 a 53Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2010); 31 a 53Revista de Administração Pública; v. 44 n. 1 (2010); 31 a 531982-31340034-7612reponame:Revista de Administração Públicainstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6913/5483Venturini, Jonas CardonaPereira, Breno Augusto DinizMorales, RonaldoFleck, Carolina FreddoJunior, Zeno BatistellaNagel, Mateus de Britoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T20:50:21Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/6913Revistahttps://ebape.fgv.br/publicacoes/rapONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rap@fgv.br1982-31340034-7612opendoar:2021-11-17T20:50:21Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institution Percepção da avaliação: um retrato da gestão pública em uma instituição de ensino superior (IES) |
title |
Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institution |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institution Venturini, Jonas Cardona public management institutional evaluation higher education institutions. gestão pública avaliação institucional instituições de ensino. |
title_short |
Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institution |
title_full |
Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institution |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institution |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institution |
title_sort |
Evaluation perception: a portrait of public management in a higher education institution |
author |
Venturini, Jonas Cardona |
author_facet |
Venturini, Jonas Cardona Pereira, Breno Augusto Diniz Morales, Ronaldo Fleck, Carolina Freddo Junior, Zeno Batistella Nagel, Mateus de Brito |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Pereira, Breno Augusto Diniz Morales, Ronaldo Fleck, Carolina Freddo Junior, Zeno Batistella Nagel, Mateus de Brito |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Venturini, Jonas Cardona Pereira, Breno Augusto Diniz Morales, Ronaldo Fleck, Carolina Freddo Junior, Zeno Batistella Nagel, Mateus de Brito |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
public management institutional evaluation higher education institutions. gestão pública avaliação institucional instituições de ensino. |
topic |
public management institutional evaluation higher education institutions. gestão pública avaliação institucional instituições de ensino. |
description |
University evaluation has been defended as a necessary tool to promote institutional competence and to improve teaching, research, extension programs and institutional management. In order to examine the institutional management process at the Federal University of Santa Maria (Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, UFSM, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil), this article presents the results of a research that identified the factors that, as perceived by 263 UFSM professors, interfere in the continuity and improvement of the institutional evaluation process. Data was collected in questionnaires and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. Between 79.9% and 95.7% of the studied factors either facilitate or obstruct the evaluation process, the following standing out with over 70%: “being conscious of the importance of evaluation”; “clear establishment of the indicating criteria that will be used in the evaluation”; “establishment and disclosure of the institution’s policies”; and the “existence of an internal evaluation commission”. To summarize, despite the exploratory nature of the study, the results revealed an adequate picture of UFSM’s evaluation process. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6913 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6913 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/6913/5483 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Public Administration; Vol. 44 No. 1 (2010); 31 a 53 Revista de Administração Pública; Vol. 44 Núm. 1 (2010); 31 a 53 Revista de Administração Pública; v. 44 n. 1 (2010); 31 a 53 1982-3134 0034-7612 reponame:Revista de Administração Pública instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Revista de Administração Pública |
collection |
Revista de Administração Pública |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Administração Pública - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||rap@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943765033910272 |