Synchronous accountability forums: the internal dynamics of budget public hearings

• Autor(a) principal: Mesquita, Tiemi Suzuki
• Data de Publicação: 2022
• Outros Autores: Azevedo, Ricardo Rocha de
• Tipo de documento: Artigo
• Idioma: por; eng
• Título da fonte: Revista de Administração Pública
• Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/rap/article/view/88553
• topic: budget public hearings; synchronous accountability forums; transparency; strategic use of information; local governments; audiencias públicas presupuestarias; foros de accountability sincrónicos; transparencia; uso estratégico de la información; gobiernos locales; audiências públicas orçamentárias; fóruns de accountability síncrona; transparência; uso estratégico da informação; governos locais

Budget public hearings are spaces for transparency and social participation. These spaces can be considered synchronous accountability forums, where the rendering of accounts and the attribution of responsibilities can co-occur, raising concerns for the responsible parties about possible accountability models. This qualitative and interpretative research analyzed the dynamics of public budget hearings organized by Brazilian municipalities using semi-structured interviews with public managers. The results indicate that those responsible for public hearings adopt strategies minimizing reputational and accountability risks at different times: (i) in the preparation stage, with the definition of participation rules and the use of an informational filter; (ii) during execution, in the form of the presentation of information and in directing the public’s attention; and, (iii) in the post-hearing stage, through low transparency and document manipulation. The research contributes to understanding hearings as forums of expected accountability, in which the expectation of the authorities can direct the dynamics of public hearings, transforming them into a theater performance. The results have implications for the courts of accounts and the legislative branch, which could exercise greater control and inspection of the hearings; for society, which could act in a more active and organized way; and also for the legislation in force, which could establish clear guidelines for holding hearings.