Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Secchi, Leonardo
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Farranha, Ana Claudia, Rodrigues, Karina Furtado, Bergue, Sandro Trescastro, Medeiros-Costa, Caio César
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/82430
Resumo: The aim of this article is to analyze the Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) 32/2020, both quantitatively and qualitatively. To undertake the analysis, first we review the literature on Public Administration reforms, while contextualizing the proposal accordingly in the Brazilian history of administrative reforms. Second, we undertake a two-step analysis of PEC 32/2020’s contents: the first consists in a systematic content analysis based on word counting, according to categories of public management policies and design of programmatic organizations. The second step consists of the qualitative analysis of the proposed changes to the constitutional principles of Public Administration and human resources management (competition, stability, commission charges, and performance). The results of the analysis show that, by dedicating more than half (53%) of the total content and 74% of its effective content (substantive provisions) to work issues of public servants, the proposal (PEC 32/2020) would be better labelled as a “civil service reform,” and not as an “administrative reform.” Regarding the new proposed constitutional principles, there is redundancy between them, especially linked to the fundamental right to good governance. Finally, we reiterate the timeliness and relevance of the discussion about the hiring process of public employees, tenure and stability for employees, appointed positions, and performance evaluation, as long as they are aligned with the ethical and constitutional principles of public service as a societal value, institutionalized to the legal system and continuously responding to the population’s welfare needs.
id FGV-6_13b7f65f8eadcec42a75463d2f9ffe99
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/82430
network_acronym_str FGV-6
network_name_str Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020Reforma Administrativa en Brasil: pasado, presente y perspectivas para el futuro ante la PEC 32/2020Reforma administrativa no Brasil: passado, presente e perspectivas para o futuro frente à PEC 32/2020Reforma AdministrativaAdministração PúblicaPEC 32/2020Serviço Público.Administrative Reform. Public Administration. PEC 32/2020. Public Service. State Reform.Reforma Administrativa; Administración Pública; PEC 32/2020; Servicio Público; Reforma del Estado.The aim of this article is to analyze the Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) 32/2020, both quantitatively and qualitatively. To undertake the analysis, first we review the literature on Public Administration reforms, while contextualizing the proposal accordingly in the Brazilian history of administrative reforms. Second, we undertake a two-step analysis of PEC 32/2020’s contents: the first consists in a systematic content analysis based on word counting, according to categories of public management policies and design of programmatic organizations. The second step consists of the qualitative analysis of the proposed changes to the constitutional principles of Public Administration and human resources management (competition, stability, commission charges, and performance). The results of the analysis show that, by dedicating more than half (53%) of the total content and 74% of its effective content (substantive provisions) to work issues of public servants, the proposal (PEC 32/2020) would be better labelled as a “civil service reform,” and not as an “administrative reform.” Regarding the new proposed constitutional principles, there is redundancy between them, especially linked to the fundamental right to good governance. Finally, we reiterate the timeliness and relevance of the discussion about the hiring process of public employees, tenure and stability for employees, appointed positions, and performance evaluation, as long as they are aligned with the ethical and constitutional principles of public service as a societal value, institutionalized to the legal system and continuously responding to the population’s welfare needs.El objetivo de este artículo es analizar cuantitativa y cualitativamente la Propuesta de Enmienda Constitucional (PEC) 32/2020, señalando aspectos críticos de formulación y decisión. Primero, se presenta una revisión de la literatura sobre reformas en la administración pública y el rescate histórico de reformas en la Administración Pública federal brasileña. En segundo lugar, la PEC 32/2020 se analiza en dos etapas: en la primera, se realiza un análisis sistemático de contenido con base en el recuento de palabras y codificación según categorías de políticas de gestión pública y diseño de organizaciones programáticas. En la segunda parte, se profundiza en el análisis cualitativo de los cambios propuestos a los principios constitucionales de la Administración Pública y la gestión de personas (competencias, estabilidad, cargos designados y desempeño). Se concluye que, al dedicar más de la mitad (53 %) de su contenido total, y el 74 % de su contenido efectivo (disposiciones sustantivas), la propuesta PEC 32/2020 podría recibir la etiqueta de "reforma de relaciones laborales" en lugar de "reforma administrativa". En cuanto a los nuevos principios constitucionales, existe una redundancia entre ellos, especialmente vinculada al derecho fundamental a la buena gobernanza. Finalmente, se reiteran la oportunidad y relevancia de la discusión de los modelos de concurso público, estabilidad del servidor, funciones designados y evaluación de prestaciones, siempre que estén en sintonía con un entendimiento ético y constitucional del servidor y el servicio público como activo de la sociedad, incorporado al sistema legal y respondiendo continuamente a las necesidades de bienestar de la población.O objetivo deste artigo é analisar quantitativamente e qualitativamente a PEC 32/2020, apontando aspectos críticos de formulação e decisão. Primeiro, parte-se de uma revisão da literatura em reformas da administração pública e do resgate histórico de reformas na Administração Pública federal brasileira. Segundo analisa-se a PEC 32/2020 em duas etapas: na primeira é realizada uma análise sistemática de conteúdo a partir da contagem de palavras e codificação destas de acordo com categorias de políticas de gestão pública e desenho de organizações programáticas. Na segunda parte, aprofunda-se na análise qualitativa sobre as propostas de alteração de princípios constitucionais da Administração Pública e da gestão de pessoas (concurso, estabilidade, cargos em comissão e desempenho). Conclui-se que, por dedicar mais da metade (53%) do conteúdo total da PEC 32/2020, e 74% do seu conteúdo efetivo (dispositivos substantivos) para a regulamentação da relação de trabalho com o servidor público, a etiqueta que melhor representaria o seu conteúdo seria reforma do funcionalismo público, ao invés de Reforma Administrativa. Com relação aos novos princípios constitucionais, verifica-se redundância entre eles, especialmente ligados ao direito fundamental à boa governança. Por fim, reitera-se a atualidade e pertinência da discussão de modelos de concurso, estabilidade do servidor, cargos em comissão e desempenho funcional, desde que sintonizadas com um entendimento ético e constitucional do servidor e do serviço público como um patrimônio da sociedade, incorporado ao ordenamento jurídico e respondendo continuamente às necessidades de bem estar da população.FGV EAESP Pesquisa e Publicações2021-03-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/8243010.12660/cgpc.v26n83.82430Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; Vol. 26 No. 83 (2021): january-aprilCadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; Vol. 26 Núm. 83 (2021): enero-abrilCadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; v. 26 n. 83 (2021): janeiro-abril2236-57101806-2261reponame:Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/82430/80083Copyright (c) 2021 Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadaniahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSecchi, LeonardoFarranha, Ana ClaudiaRodrigues, Karina FurtadoBergue, Sandro TrescastroMedeiros-Costa, Caio César2023-08-23T15:44:34Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/82430Revistahttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/cgpc/indexPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/cgpc/oaicadernosgpc-edicao@fgv.br||cadernosgpc-edicao@fgv.br2236-57101806-2261opendoar:2023-08-23T15:44:34Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020
Reforma Administrativa en Brasil: pasado, presente y perspectivas para el futuro ante la PEC 32/2020
Reforma administrativa no Brasil: passado, presente e perspectivas para o futuro frente à PEC 32/2020
title Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020
spellingShingle Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020
Secchi, Leonardo
Reforma Administrativa
Administração Pública
PEC 32/2020
Serviço Público.
Administrative Reform. Public Administration. PEC 32/2020. Public Service. State Reform.
Reforma Administrativa; Administración Pública; PEC 32/2020; Servicio Público; Reforma del Estado.
title_short Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020
title_full Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020
title_fullStr Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020
title_full_unstemmed Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020
title_sort Administrative Reforms in Brazil: past, present, and future perspectives following PEC 32/2020
author Secchi, Leonardo
author_facet Secchi, Leonardo
Farranha, Ana Claudia
Rodrigues, Karina Furtado
Bergue, Sandro Trescastro
Medeiros-Costa, Caio César
author_role author
author2 Farranha, Ana Claudia
Rodrigues, Karina Furtado
Bergue, Sandro Trescastro
Medeiros-Costa, Caio César
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Secchi, Leonardo
Farranha, Ana Claudia
Rodrigues, Karina Furtado
Bergue, Sandro Trescastro
Medeiros-Costa, Caio César
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reforma Administrativa
Administração Pública
PEC 32/2020
Serviço Público.
Administrative Reform. Public Administration. PEC 32/2020. Public Service. State Reform.
Reforma Administrativa; Administración Pública; PEC 32/2020; Servicio Público; Reforma del Estado.
topic Reforma Administrativa
Administração Pública
PEC 32/2020
Serviço Público.
Administrative Reform. Public Administration. PEC 32/2020. Public Service. State Reform.
Reforma Administrativa; Administración Pública; PEC 32/2020; Servicio Público; Reforma del Estado.
description The aim of this article is to analyze the Constitutional Amendment Proposal (PEC) 32/2020, both quantitatively and qualitatively. To undertake the analysis, first we review the literature on Public Administration reforms, while contextualizing the proposal accordingly in the Brazilian history of administrative reforms. Second, we undertake a two-step analysis of PEC 32/2020’s contents: the first consists in a systematic content analysis based on word counting, according to categories of public management policies and design of programmatic organizations. The second step consists of the qualitative analysis of the proposed changes to the constitutional principles of Public Administration and human resources management (competition, stability, commission charges, and performance). The results of the analysis show that, by dedicating more than half (53%) of the total content and 74% of its effective content (substantive provisions) to work issues of public servants, the proposal (PEC 32/2020) would be better labelled as a “civil service reform,” and not as an “administrative reform.” Regarding the new proposed constitutional principles, there is redundancy between them, especially linked to the fundamental right to good governance. Finally, we reiterate the timeliness and relevance of the discussion about the hiring process of public employees, tenure and stability for employees, appointed positions, and performance evaluation, as long as they are aligned with the ethical and constitutional principles of public service as a societal value, institutionalized to the legal system and continuously responding to the population’s welfare needs.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-03-18
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/82430
10.12660/cgpc.v26n83.82430
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/82430
identifier_str_mv 10.12660/cgpc.v26n83.82430
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cgpc/article/view/82430/80083
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv FGV EAESP Pesquisa e Publicações
publisher.none.fl_str_mv FGV EAESP Pesquisa e Publicações
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; Vol. 26 No. 83 (2021): january-april
Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; Vol. 26 Núm. 83 (2021): enero-abril
Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania; v. 26 n. 83 (2021): janeiro-abril
2236-5710
1806-2261
reponame:Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
collection Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos Gestão Pública e Cidadania (Online) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosgpc-edicao@fgv.br||cadernosgpc-edicao@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943795195150336