Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Athayde, André Luiz Mendes
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Alves, Luís Fernando de Souza, Paula, Pablo Perón de, Gomes, Adalmir de Oliveira
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/85530
Resumo: Considering the criticisms of Habermas’ communicative action theory, this essay problematized and reflected on another possible criticism: scholars of the theory, despite presenting a common understanding – enlightenment and emancipation of man – do not reach a consensus on what this theory represents compared to other theories and rationality types. The guiding question of the essay is: does the transition proposed by Habermas from other rationality types to the communicative concern an interparadigmatic theory or a paradigmatic leap? Methodologically, we adopted the conception of an essay according to which authors and readers need to recognize that reality can be understood in different ways. The discussion, contextualized in public administration, allowed us to understand that considering the communicative action theory as having an interparadigmatic character does not mean it is a mere gathering of other theories because it surpasses those it dialogues with, additionally presenting a radical shift. We propose that the Communicative action theory comprises a paradigmatic leap with interparadigmatic characteristics. Finally, we present implications of this discussion for Public Administration.
id FGV-9_6d007929259baea4cc3e05243b9f313a
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85530
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration¿Existe falta de consenso sobre la teoría del consenso? La teoría de la acción comunicativa de Habermas contextualizada en la administración públicaExiste falta de consenso quanto à teoria do consenso? A teoria da ação comunicativa de Habermas contextualizada na administração públicaAção comunicativaRacionalidade comunicativaHabermasAdministração públicaParticipação socialCommunicative actionCommunicative rationalityHabermasPublic AdministrationSocial participationAcción comunicativaRacionalidad comunicativaHabermasAdministración públicaParticipación socialConsidering the criticisms of Habermas’ communicative action theory, this essay problematized and reflected on another possible criticism: scholars of the theory, despite presenting a common understanding – enlightenment and emancipation of man – do not reach a consensus on what this theory represents compared to other theories and rationality types. The guiding question of the essay is: does the transition proposed by Habermas from other rationality types to the communicative concern an interparadigmatic theory or a paradigmatic leap? Methodologically, we adopted the conception of an essay according to which authors and readers need to recognize that reality can be understood in different ways. The discussion, contextualized in public administration, allowed us to understand that considering the communicative action theory as having an interparadigmatic character does not mean it is a mere gathering of other theories because it surpasses those it dialogues with, additionally presenting a radical shift. We propose that the Communicative action theory comprises a paradigmatic leap with interparadigmatic characteristics. Finally, we present implications of this discussion for Public Administration.Cada vez más, la investigación sobre la gestión de las organizaciones culturales se destaca al reconocer las contribuciones simbólicas y materialeConsiderando las críticas a la teoría de la acción comunicativa de Habermas, este ensayo problematizó y reflexionó sobre otra posible crítica: los estudiosos de la teoría en cuestión, a pesar de presentar un entendimiento común –iluminación y emancipación del hombre–, no llegan a un consenso sobre lo que esta teoría representa, en comparación con otras teorías y tipos de racionalidad. La pregunta orientadora del ensayo fue: ¿la transición propuesta por Habermas de otro tipo de racionalidad a la comunicativa concierne a una teoría interparadigmática o un salto paradigmático? Metodológicamente, adoptamos la concepción de ensayo según la cual autores y lectores deben reconocer que la realidad puede entenderse de diferentes formas. La discusión, contextualizada en la administración pública, permitió entender que considerar la teoría de la acción comunicativa como de carácter interparadigmático no significa que sea un mera agrupación de otras teorías, pues va más allá de aquellas con las que dialoga, presentando, además, un cambio radical. Proponemos que la teoría de la acción comunicativa comprende un salto paradigmático con características interparadigmáticas. Finalmente, presentamos las implicaciones de esta discusión para la administración pública.Considerando as críticas à teoria da ação comunicativa de Habermas, este ensaio problematizou e refletiu sobre outra possível crítica: estudiosos da teoria em questão, apesar de apresentarem um entendimento comum – iluminação e emancipação do homem –, não chegam a um consenso sobre o que essa teoria representa, quando comparada a outras teorias e tipos de racionalidades. A questão norteadora do ensaio foi: a transição proposta por Habermas de outros tipos de racionalidades para a comunicativa diz respeito a uma teoria interparadigmática ou a um salto paradigmático? Metodologicamente, adotamos a concepção de ensaio segundo a qual autores e leitores precisam reconhecer que a realidade pode ser compreendida de diferentes maneiras. A discussão, contextualizada na administração pública, permitiu-nos compreender que considerarmos a teoria da ação comunicativa como possuidora de um carácter interparadigmático não significa que a mesma seja um mero ajuntamento de outras teorias, porque ela ultrapassa aquelas com as quais dialoga, apresentando, adicionalmente, uma mudança radical. Propomos que a teoria da ação comunicativa compreende um salto paradigmático com características interparadigmáticas. Por fim, apresentamos implicações dessa discussão para a administração pública.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2022-04-26info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/8553010.1590/1679-395120210013Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2022); 164-178Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2022); 164-178Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 20 n. 2 (2022); 164-1781679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/85530/80708https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/85530/80709Athayde, André Luiz MendesAlves, Luís Fernando de SouzaPaula, Pablo Perón deGomes, Adalmir de Oliveirainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-26T22:51:11Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/85530Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T10:00:26.258445Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration
¿Existe falta de consenso sobre la teoría del consenso? La teoría de la acción comunicativa de Habermas contextualizada en la administración pública
Existe falta de consenso quanto à teoria do consenso? A teoria da ação comunicativa de Habermas contextualizada na administração pública
title Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration
spellingShingle Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration
Athayde, André Luiz Mendes
Ação comunicativa
Racionalidade comunicativa
Habermas
Administração pública
Participação social
Communicative action
Communicative rationality
Habermas
Public Administration
Social participation
Acción comunicativa
Racionalidad comunicativa
Habermas
Administración pública
Participación social
title_short Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration
title_full Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration
title_fullStr Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration
title_full_unstemmed Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration
title_sort Is there a lack of consensus on consensus theory? Habermas’ communicative action theory contextualized in public administration
author Athayde, André Luiz Mendes
author_facet Athayde, André Luiz Mendes
Alves, Luís Fernando de Souza
Paula, Pablo Perón de
Gomes, Adalmir de Oliveira
author_role author
author2 Alves, Luís Fernando de Souza
Paula, Pablo Perón de
Gomes, Adalmir de Oliveira
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Athayde, André Luiz Mendes
Alves, Luís Fernando de Souza
Paula, Pablo Perón de
Gomes, Adalmir de Oliveira
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ação comunicativa
Racionalidade comunicativa
Habermas
Administração pública
Participação social
Communicative action
Communicative rationality
Habermas
Public Administration
Social participation
Acción comunicativa
Racionalidad comunicativa
Habermas
Administración pública
Participación social
topic Ação comunicativa
Racionalidade comunicativa
Habermas
Administração pública
Participação social
Communicative action
Communicative rationality
Habermas
Public Administration
Social participation
Acción comunicativa
Racionalidad comunicativa
Habermas
Administración pública
Participación social
description Considering the criticisms of Habermas’ communicative action theory, this essay problematized and reflected on another possible criticism: scholars of the theory, despite presenting a common understanding – enlightenment and emancipation of man – do not reach a consensus on what this theory represents compared to other theories and rationality types. The guiding question of the essay is: does the transition proposed by Habermas from other rationality types to the communicative concern an interparadigmatic theory or a paradigmatic leap? Methodologically, we adopted the conception of an essay according to which authors and readers need to recognize that reality can be understood in different ways. The discussion, contextualized in public administration, allowed us to understand that considering the communicative action theory as having an interparadigmatic character does not mean it is a mere gathering of other theories because it surpasses those it dialogues with, additionally presenting a radical shift. We propose that the Communicative action theory comprises a paradigmatic leap with interparadigmatic characteristics. Finally, we present implications of this discussion for Public Administration.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-26
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/85530
10.1590/1679-395120210013
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/85530
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/1679-395120210013
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/85530/80708
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/85530/80709
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 20 No. 2 (2022); 164-178
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 20 Núm. 2 (2022); 164-178
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 20 n. 2 (2022); 164-178
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1798943213838401536

Registros relacionados