He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ history

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Patrus, Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Shigaki, Helena Belintani, Dantas, Douglas Cabral
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Cadernos EBAPE.BR
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/66526
Resumo: This paper aims to highlight some distortions in the Capes evaluation system, particularly in the area of Administration, Accounting and Tourism, starting from the history of Capes in Brazil. Through this analysis, it was possible to conclude that the change in the assignment of grades from 1 to 5 to 1 to 7 in the 1990s was not followed by a change in the Capes evaluation system, which still uses scores from 1 to 5 to evaluate the programs in each of their requirements. Such distortion becomes incompatible with an evaluation system that is summative and classificatory. As a consequence, productivity is confused with productivism, methodological rigor for the evaluation of programs is jeopardized, and the educational character of a formative evaluation is abandoned.
id FGV-9_a7ffc543679cf29bcf1a5bb0adac6a1c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/66526
network_acronym_str FGV-9
network_name_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository_id_str
spelling He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ historyQuién no conoce su pasado está condenado a repetirlo: distorsiones de la evaluación del posgrado en Brasil a la luz de la historia de CapesQuem não conhece seu passado está condenado a repeti-lo: distorções da avaliação da pós-graduação no Brasil à luz da história da CapesPostgraduate. Teaching. Research. Capes. Evaluation.Posgrado. Enseñanza. Investigación. Capes. Evaluación.Pós-graduação. Ensino. Pesquisa. Capes. Avaliação.This paper aims to highlight some distortions in the Capes evaluation system, particularly in the area of Administration, Accounting and Tourism, starting from the history of Capes in Brazil. Through this analysis, it was possible to conclude that the change in the assignment of grades from 1 to 5 to 1 to 7 in the 1990s was not followed by a change in the Capes evaluation system, which still uses scores from 1 to 5 to evaluate the programs in each of their requirements. Such distortion becomes incompatible with an evaluation system that is summative and classificatory. As a consequence, productivity is confused with productivism, methodological rigor for the evaluation of programs is jeopardized, and the educational character of a formative evaluation is abandoned.Este artículo tiene como objetivo señalar algunas distorsiones en el sistema de evaluación de la Capes, específicamente en el área de Administración, Ciencias Contables y Turismo, desde la historia de la propia Capes. El análisis de esta historia lleva a la conclusión de que el cambio de atribución de notas de 1 a 5 a de 1 a 7, realizado en los años 1990, no fue acompañado por un cambio en el sistema de evaluación de la Capes, que todavía se vale de notas de 1 a 5 para evaluar los programas en cada una de sus cuestiones. Tal distorsión es incompatible con un sistema de evaluación sumativa, clasificatoria. En consecuencia, se confunde productividad con productivismo, se compromete el rigor metodológico para la evaluación de los programas y se abandona el carácter educativo de una evaluación formativa.Este artigo tem por objetivo apontar algumas distorções no sistema de avaliação da Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (Capes) no Brasil, em particular na área de Administração, Ciências Contábeis e Turismo, a partir da história da própria Capes. A análise dessa história possibilitou concluir que a mudança da atribuição de notas de 1 a 5 para 1 a 7, adotada nos anos 1990, não se fez acompanhar de uma mudança do sistema de avaliação da Capes, que ainda se vale de notas de 1 a 5 para avaliar os programas em cada um de seus quesitos. Tal distorção se mostra incompatível com um sistema de avaliação somativo, classificatório. Como consequência, confunde-se produtividade com produtivismo, compromete-se o rigor metodológico para a avaliação dos programas e abandona-se o caráter educativo de uma avaliação formativa.Escola Brasileira de AdEscola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)2018-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/66526Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2018); 642-655Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 16 Núm. 4 (2018); 642-655Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 16 n. 4 (2018); 642-6551679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporenghttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/66526/73804https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/66526/73805Copyright (c) 2018 Cadernos EBAPE.BRinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPatrus, RobertoShigaki, Helena BelintaniDantas, Douglas Cabral2018-12-04T18:23:47Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/66526Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapePRIhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2018-12-04T18:23:47Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ history
Quién no conoce su pasado está condenado a repetirlo: distorsiones de la evaluación del posgrado en Brasil a la luz de la historia de Capes
Quem não conhece seu passado está condenado a repeti-lo: distorções da avaliação da pós-graduação no Brasil à luz da história da Capes
title He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ history
spellingShingle He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ history
Patrus, Roberto
Postgraduate. Teaching. Research. Capes. Evaluation.
Posgrado. Enseñanza. Investigación. Capes. Evaluación.
Pós-graduação. Ensino. Pesquisa. Capes. Avaliação.
title_short He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ history
title_full He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ history
title_fullStr He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ history
title_full_unstemmed He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ history
title_sort He who ignores the past is doomed to repeat it: distortions of postgraduate evaluation in Brazil based on Capes’ history
author Patrus, Roberto
author_facet Patrus, Roberto
Shigaki, Helena Belintani
Dantas, Douglas Cabral
author_role author
author2 Shigaki, Helena Belintani
Dantas, Douglas Cabral
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Patrus, Roberto
Shigaki, Helena Belintani
Dantas, Douglas Cabral
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Postgraduate. Teaching. Research. Capes. Evaluation.
Posgrado. Enseñanza. Investigación. Capes. Evaluación.
Pós-graduação. Ensino. Pesquisa. Capes. Avaliação.
topic Postgraduate. Teaching. Research. Capes. Evaluation.
Posgrado. Enseñanza. Investigación. Capes. Evaluación.
Pós-graduação. Ensino. Pesquisa. Capes. Avaliação.
description This paper aims to highlight some distortions in the Capes evaluation system, particularly in the area of Administration, Accounting and Tourism, starting from the history of Capes in Brazil. Through this analysis, it was possible to conclude that the change in the assignment of grades from 1 to 5 to 1 to 7 in the 1990s was not followed by a change in the Capes evaluation system, which still uses scores from 1 to 5 to evaluate the programs in each of their requirements. Such distortion becomes incompatible with an evaluation system that is summative and classificatory. As a consequence, productivity is confused with productivism, methodological rigor for the evaluation of programs is jeopardized, and the educational character of a formative evaluation is abandoned.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-09-13
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/66526
url https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/66526
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/66526/73804
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/66526/73805
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2018 Cadernos EBAPE.BR
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de AdEscola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Escola Brasileira de AdEscola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV EBAPE)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 16 No. 4 (2018); 642-655
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 16 Núm. 4 (2018); 642-655
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 16 n. 4 (2018); 642-655
1679-3951
reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR
instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron:FGV
instname_str Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
instacron_str FGV
institution FGV
reponame_str Cadernos EBAPE.BR
collection Cadernos EBAPE.BR
repository.name.fl_str_mv Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br
_version_ 1819875608734203904

Registros relacionados