Discussions about employer control
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2014 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/39682 |
Resumo: | The article evaluates the main theses of the theory and criticism of employers in light of current development of capitalism control. Analyze the consistency of this approach with Marxist theory and contrasts the contribution of Braverman impaired vision and neoclassical theory of regulation. The text also reviews the scope of the concept of Taylorism assigned based on the current segmentation and intellectualization of labor. Find out which way the problem of privileged Braverman resistance analysis and investigates how consent addressed the relationship between work and recovery processes. Successes are also reported in measuring marks for the degree of dominance in the understanding of the task. But the problematic relationship of absolute disqualification forecasts with the concept of increasing misery stands. The political implications of this thesis are underlined. The article ponders the holistic approach of Braverman and his emphasis on the centrality and not the end of work. His eyes out as confiscatory background for understanding the current precarious employment. |
id |
FGV-9_c7ce140e9b858be62f3c71dc40a72e21 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/39682 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV-9 |
network_name_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Discussions about employer controlDiscusiones sobre el control patronalDiscussões sobre controle do empregadorThe article evaluates the main theses of the theory and criticism of employers in light of current development of capitalism control. Analyze the consistency of this approach with Marxist theory and contrasts the contribution of Braverman impaired vision and neoclassical theory of regulation. The text also reviews the scope of the concept of Taylorism assigned based on the current segmentation and intellectualization of labor. Find out which way the problem of privileged Braverman resistance analysis and investigates how consent addressed the relationship between work and recovery processes. Successes are also reported in measuring marks for the degree of dominance in the understanding of the task. But the problematic relationship of absolute disqualification forecasts with the concept of increasing misery stands. The political implications of this thesis are underlined. The article ponders the holistic approach of Braverman and his emphasis on the centrality and not the end of work. His eyes out as confiscatory background for understanding the current precarious employment.El artículo evalúa las principales tesis y críticas de la teoría del control patronal a la luz del desenvolvimiento actual del capitalismo. Analiza la consistencia de ese enfoque con la teoría marxista y contrasta el aporte de Braverman con problemas de la visión neoclásica y la Teoría de la Regulación. El texto también revisa el alcance asignado al concepto de taylorismo en función de la segmentación e intelectualización actual del trabajo. Estudia en qué sentido Braverman privilegió la problemática de la resistencia al análisis del consentimiento e indaga cómo abordó la relación entre los procesos de trabajo y valorización. También se señalan aciertos, en la medición de las calificaciones por el grado de dominio en la comprensión de la tarea realizada. Pero se destaca la problemática relación de los pronósticos de descalificación absoluta con el concepto de miseria creciente. Se subrayan las implicancias políticas de esta tesis. El artículo pondera del enfoque totalizador de Braverman y su énfasis en la centralidad y no el fin del trabajo. Destaca como su mirada permite comprender el trasfondo confiscatorio de la precarización actual del empleo. O artigo avalia as principais teses da teoria e crítica de empregadores, tendo em conta o desenvolvimento atual de controle capitalismo. Analisar a consistência desta abordagem com a teoria marxista e contrasta a contribuição de Braverman problemas de visão e teoria neoclássica da regulação. O texto também analisa o alcance do conceito de taylorismo atribuído com base na segmentação atual e intelectualização do trabalho. Descubra o caminho que o problema da análise de resistência Braverman privilegiada e investiga como consentimento abordou a relação entre os processos de trabalho e recuperação. Também são relatados sucessos na medição marcas para o grau de domínio no entendimento da tarefa. Mas a relação problemática das previsões de desqualificação absoluta com o conceito de miséria crescente stands. As implicações políticas desta tese estão sublinhadas. O artigo reflete sobre a abordagem holística de Braverman e sua ênfase na centralidade e não o fim do trabalho. Seus olhos fora como pano de fundo para a compreensão do caráter confiscatório emprego precário atual.Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas2014-11-19info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/39682Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 12 No. 4 (2014) - Labor/valorization process - 40 years after Labor and Monopoly Capital, by Harry Braverman; 866 a 882Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 12 Núm. 4 (2014) - Proceso de trabajo/valorización 40 años después de Trabajo y Capital Monopolista de Harry Braverman; 866 a 882Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 12 n. 4 (2014) - Processo de trabalho/valorização - 40 anos após Trabalho e Capital Monopolista de Harry Braverman; 866 a 8821679-3951reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BRinstname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVporhttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/39682/38583Katz, Claudioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-02-23T19:22:37Zoai:ojs.periodicos.fgv.br:article/39682Revistahttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebapehttps://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/oaicadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br1679-39511679-3951opendoar:2024-05-13T09:59:55.411241Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)true |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Discussions about employer control Discusiones sobre el control patronal Discussões sobre controle do empregador |
title |
Discussions about employer control |
spellingShingle |
Discussions about employer control Katz, Claudio |
title_short |
Discussions about employer control |
title_full |
Discussions about employer control |
title_fullStr |
Discussions about employer control |
title_full_unstemmed |
Discussions about employer control |
title_sort |
Discussions about employer control |
author |
Katz, Claudio |
author_facet |
Katz, Claudio |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Katz, Claudio |
description |
The article evaluates the main theses of the theory and criticism of employers in light of current development of capitalism control. Analyze the consistency of this approach with Marxist theory and contrasts the contribution of Braverman impaired vision and neoclassical theory of regulation. The text also reviews the scope of the concept of Taylorism assigned based on the current segmentation and intellectualization of labor. Find out which way the problem of privileged Braverman resistance analysis and investigates how consent addressed the relationship between work and recovery processes. Successes are also reported in measuring marks for the degree of dominance in the understanding of the task. But the problematic relationship of absolute disqualification forecasts with the concept of increasing misery stands. The political implications of this thesis are underlined. The article ponders the holistic approach of Braverman and his emphasis on the centrality and not the end of work. His eyes out as confiscatory background for understanding the current precarious employment. |
publishDate |
2014 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014-11-19 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/39682 |
url |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/39682 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.fgv.br/cadernosebape/article/view/39682/38583 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Escola Brasileira de Administração Pública e de Empresas da Fundação Getulio Vargas |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 12 No. 4 (2014) - Labor/valorization process - 40 years after Labor and Monopoly Capital, by Harry Braverman; 866 a 882 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; Vol. 12 Núm. 4 (2014) - Proceso de trabajo/valorización 40 años después de Trabajo y Capital Monopolista de Harry Braverman; 866 a 882 Cadernos EBAPE.BR; v. 12 n. 4 (2014) - Processo de trabalho/valorização - 40 anos após Trabalho e Capital Monopolista de Harry Braverman; 866 a 882 1679-3951 reponame:Cadernos EBAPE.BR instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
collection |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Cadernos EBAPE.BR - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cadernosebape@fgv.br||cadernosebape@fgv.br |
_version_ |
1798943210166288384 |