The asymmetric dominance effect and beer brands
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
Texto Completo: | https://hdl.handle.net/10438/29062 |
Resumo: | This study aims to explore in which situations the asymmetric dominance effect might happen or not. Some authors suggest that the effect only happen in very rare occasions, where the stimuli is quantitative and clear. As for qualitative stimuli, the effect is diminished and practically vanishes. The main reason is that qualitative stimuli, such as perception of image quality or brands, rely on subjective interpretation. The present study investigates the effect using three beer brands and measures an individual’s brand preference using consumerbased brand equity (CBBE). The choice set is constructed in a way that the most preferred brand is set at a higher price, the second option as the target and at the same price as the third option, the decoy. In this case, the decoy effect would happen if respondents choose the second preferred option. Essentially, the key question here is to understand if the effect would happen given different levels of brand preference. Results showed that the effect was not observable (p-value not significant at 5% but significant at 10%). In addition, brand preference measurements were not good predictors for the targeted option. However, when it comes to overall choice, brand preference was a good predictor of choice. The results serve as initial thoughts of investigating the effect using a metric to measure how respondent perceive certain qualitative stimuli. |
id |
FGV_1c60ea418ca83097a64c976895c967de |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/29062 |
network_acronym_str |
FGV |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
repository_id_str |
3974 |
spelling |
Sun, WilliamEscolas::EAESPPereira, Lilian CarvalhoLopes, EvandroLourenço, Carlos Eduardo2020-05-07T20:32:53Z2020-05-07T20:32:53Z2020-04-07https://hdl.handle.net/10438/29062This study aims to explore in which situations the asymmetric dominance effect might happen or not. Some authors suggest that the effect only happen in very rare occasions, where the stimuli is quantitative and clear. As for qualitative stimuli, the effect is diminished and practically vanishes. The main reason is that qualitative stimuli, such as perception of image quality or brands, rely on subjective interpretation. The present study investigates the effect using three beer brands and measures an individual’s brand preference using consumerbased brand equity (CBBE). The choice set is constructed in a way that the most preferred brand is set at a higher price, the second option as the target and at the same price as the third option, the decoy. In this case, the decoy effect would happen if respondents choose the second preferred option. Essentially, the key question here is to understand if the effect would happen given different levels of brand preference. Results showed that the effect was not observable (p-value not significant at 5% but significant at 10%). In addition, brand preference measurements were not good predictors for the targeted option. However, when it comes to overall choice, brand preference was a good predictor of choice. The results serve as initial thoughts of investigating the effect using a metric to measure how respondent perceive certain qualitative stimuli.Este estudo tem como objetivo explorar em quais situações o efeito de dominância assimétrica pode ocorrer ou não. Alguns autores sugerem que o efeito ocorre apenas em ocasiões muito raras, onde os estímulos são quantitativos e claros. Quanto aos estímulos qualitativos, o efeito é diminuído e praticamente desaparece. A principal razão é que estímulos qualitativos, como a percepção da qualidade da imagem ou das marcas, se baseiam na interpretação subjetiva. O presente estudo investiga o efeito usando três marcas de cerveja e mede a preferência de marca de um indivíduo usando o valor da marca baseado no consumidor (VMBC). O conjunto de opções é construído de forma que a marca mais preferida seja definida com um preço mais alto, a segunda opção como alvo e precificado igualmente à terceira opção, a isca. Nesse caso, o “efeito isca” (decoy effect) aconteceria se os respondentes escolhessem a segunda opção preferida. Essencialmente, a questão principal aqui é entender se o efeito aconteceria com diferentes níveis de preferência de marca. Os resultados mostraram que o efeito não foi observável (valor-p não significante a 5%, mas significante a 10%). Além disso, as métricas de preferência da marca não foram bons preditores para a opção alvo. No entanto, quando se trata da escolha geral, a preferência de marca foi um bom preditor de escolha. Os resultados servem como passos iniciais para investigar o efeito utilizando métricas para mensurar como respondentes assimilam estímulos qualitativos.engDecoy effectAsymmetric dominance effectMarketingConsumer behaviorBehavioral economicsEfeito iscaEfeito de dominância assimétricaComportamento do consumidorEconomia comportamentalAdministração de empresasComportamento do consumidorConsumidores - AtitudesProcesso decisórioMarketingEconomia - Aspectos psicológicosThe asymmetric dominance effect and beer brandsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital)instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)instacron:FGVORIGINALWilliam Sun.pdfWilliam Sun.pdfPDFapplication/pdf560845https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/49bfff0f-cf8d-4531-b70c-fb52fba12199/download8b63fe7a2863871912177591ef8b0ec3MD51LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-84707https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/06c2ebea-7fc7-4ede-8fa7-c3d695fa389f/downloaddfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1MD52TEXTWilliam Sun.pdf.txtWilliam Sun.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain70864https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/46a73246-6c79-42af-b5ff-16b5d9b30e0e/download2ff15fbb9e638eff0fe158bc4c625133MD55THUMBNAILWilliam Sun.pdf.jpgWilliam Sun.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2357https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/3a093e98-53b0-444a-af8a-ae4e3b1fa179/downloade7b1705fa68a9a898d81a99cfcb0086cMD5610438/290622023-11-25 10:23:00.326open.accessoai:repositorio.fgv.br:10438/29062https://repositorio.fgv.brRepositório InstitucionalPRIhttp://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace-oai/requestopendoar:39742023-11-25T10:23Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV)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 |
dc.title.eng.fl_str_mv |
The asymmetric dominance effect and beer brands |
title |
The asymmetric dominance effect and beer brands |
spellingShingle |
The asymmetric dominance effect and beer brands Sun, William Decoy effect Asymmetric dominance effect Marketing Consumer behavior Behavioral economics Efeito isca Efeito de dominância assimétrica Comportamento do consumidor Economia comportamental Administração de empresas Comportamento do consumidor Consumidores - Atitudes Processo decisório Marketing Economia - Aspectos psicológicos |
title_short |
The asymmetric dominance effect and beer brands |
title_full |
The asymmetric dominance effect and beer brands |
title_fullStr |
The asymmetric dominance effect and beer brands |
title_full_unstemmed |
The asymmetric dominance effect and beer brands |
title_sort |
The asymmetric dominance effect and beer brands |
author |
Sun, William |
author_facet |
Sun, William |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.unidadefgv.por.fl_str_mv |
Escolas::EAESP |
dc.contributor.member.none.fl_str_mv |
Pereira, Lilian Carvalho Lopes, Evandro |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sun, William |
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv |
Lourenço, Carlos Eduardo |
contributor_str_mv |
Lourenço, Carlos Eduardo |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Decoy effect Asymmetric dominance effect Marketing Consumer behavior Behavioral economics |
topic |
Decoy effect Asymmetric dominance effect Marketing Consumer behavior Behavioral economics Efeito isca Efeito de dominância assimétrica Comportamento do consumidor Economia comportamental Administração de empresas Comportamento do consumidor Consumidores - Atitudes Processo decisório Marketing Economia - Aspectos psicológicos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Efeito isca Efeito de dominância assimétrica Comportamento do consumidor Economia comportamental |
dc.subject.area.por.fl_str_mv |
Administração de empresas |
dc.subject.bibliodata.por.fl_str_mv |
Comportamento do consumidor Consumidores - Atitudes Processo decisório Marketing Economia - Aspectos psicológicos |
description |
This study aims to explore in which situations the asymmetric dominance effect might happen or not. Some authors suggest that the effect only happen in very rare occasions, where the stimuli is quantitative and clear. As for qualitative stimuli, the effect is diminished and practically vanishes. The main reason is that qualitative stimuli, such as perception of image quality or brands, rely on subjective interpretation. The present study investigates the effect using three beer brands and measures an individual’s brand preference using consumerbased brand equity (CBBE). The choice set is constructed in a way that the most preferred brand is set at a higher price, the second option as the target and at the same price as the third option, the decoy. In this case, the decoy effect would happen if respondents choose the second preferred option. Essentially, the key question here is to understand if the effect would happen given different levels of brand preference. Results showed that the effect was not observable (p-value not significant at 5% but significant at 10%). In addition, brand preference measurements were not good predictors for the targeted option. However, when it comes to overall choice, brand preference was a good predictor of choice. The results serve as initial thoughts of investigating the effect using a metric to measure how respondent perceive certain qualitative stimuli. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-07T20:32:53Z |
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv |
2020-05-07T20:32:53Z |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2020-04-07 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10438/29062 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10438/29062 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) instname:Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) instacron:FGV |
instname_str |
Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
instacron_str |
FGV |
institution |
FGV |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
collection |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/49bfff0f-cf8d-4531-b70c-fb52fba12199/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/06c2ebea-7fc7-4ede-8fa7-c3d695fa389f/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/46a73246-6c79-42af-b5ff-16b5d9b30e0e/download https://repositorio.fgv.br/bitstreams/3a093e98-53b0-444a-af8a-ae4e3b1fa179/download |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
8b63fe7a2863871912177591ef8b0ec3 dfb340242cced38a6cca06c627998fa1 2ff15fbb9e638eff0fe158bc4c625133 e7b1705fa68a9a898d81a99cfcb0086c |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional do FGV (FGV Repositório Digital) - Fundação Getulio Vargas (FGV) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1813797786612662272 |